Auditory rehabilitation after stroke: treatment of auditory processing disorders in stroke patients with personal frequency-modulated (FM) systems

References

• Bamiou DE, Werring D, Cox K, et al. Patient-reported auditory functions after stroke of the central auditory pathway. Stroke. 2012;43:1285–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formby C, Phillips DE, Thomas RG. Hearing loss among stroke patients. Ear Hear. 1987;8:326–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran R, Worrall LE, Hickson L. The number of patients with communication related impairments in acute hospital stroke units. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;11:438–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis AC, Wharrad HJ, Sancho J, et al. Early detection of hearing impairment: what role is there for behavioural methods in the neonatal period? Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1991;482:103–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamasoba T, Lin FR, Someya S, et al. Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hear Res. 2013;303:30–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald BK, Cockerell OC, Sander JW, et al. The incidence and lifetime prevalence of neurological disorders in a prospective community-based study in the UK. Brain. 2000;123:665–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamiou DE. Hearing disorders in stroke. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:633–647.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen L, Mehta S, McClure JA, et al. Therapeutic interventions for aphasia initiated more than six months post stroke: a review of the evidence. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19: 523–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek FE, Baran JA, Pinheiro ML. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology. 1990;29:304–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, et al. GIN (gaps-in-noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear. 2005;26:608–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran R, Worrall L, Hickson L. Stroke patients communicating their healthcare needs in hospital: a study within the ICF framework. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47: 130–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger S. Negative consequences of uncorrected hearing loss–a review. Int J Audiol. 2003;42:2S17–2S20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landi F, Onder G, Cesari M, et al. Functional decline in frail community-dwelling stroke patients. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13: 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey B, Frischknecht R, Maeder P, et al. Patterns of recovery following focal hemispheric lesions: relationship between lasting deficit and damage to specialized networks. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:285–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer EC, Thibodeau LM. Speech recognition abilities of adults using cochlear implants with FM systems. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004;15:678–691.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schafer EC, Mathews L, Mehta S, et al. Personal FM systems for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an initial investigation. J Commun Disord. 2013;46:30–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer EC, Traber J, Layden P, et al. Use of wireless technology for children with auditory processing disorders, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and language disorders. Semin Hear. 2014;35:193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe J, Schafer EC. Optimizing the benefit of sound processors coupled to personal FM systems. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19:585–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanschmann H, Wiehe S, Muller-Mazzotta J, et al. [Speech perception in noise with and without FM technology]. HNO. 2010;58:674–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston KN, John AB, Kreisman NV, et al. Multiple benefits of personal FM system use by children with auditory processing disorder (APD). Int J Audiol. 2009;48:371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk F, Jackson A, Keenan D, et al. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19:465–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MS, Hutter M, Lilly DJ, et al. Frequency-modulation (FM) technology as a method for improving speech perception in noise for individuals with multiple sclerosis. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17:605–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos ICC, Jacob RTS, Gejao MG, et al. Frequency modulation (FM) system in auditory processing disorder: an evidence-based practice? Pro Fono. 2009;21:243–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rance G, Corben LA, Du Bourg E, et al. Successful treatment of auditory perceptual disorder in individuals with friedreich ataxia. Neuroscience. 2010;171:552–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer AGW, Wit HP, TenVergert EM, et al. Reliability and validity of the (modified) Amsterdam inventory for auditory disability and handicap. Int J Audiol. 2003;42:220–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyridakou C, Luxon LM, Bamiou DE. Patient-reported speech in noise difficulties and hyperacusis symptoms and correlation with test results. Laryngoscope. 2012;122: 1609–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goll JC, Crutch SJ, Loo JH, et al. Non-verbal sound processing in the primary progressive aphasias. Brain. 2009;133: 272–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewan CM, Kertesz A. Reliability and validity characteristics of the western aphasia battery (WAB). J Speech Hear Disord. 1980;45:308–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Recommended procedure pure-tone air-conduction and bone-conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking. British Society of Audiology Septmber 2011; [cited 2014 Sep 30]; Available from: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2014/04/BSA_RP_PTA_FINAL_24Sept11_MinorAmend06Feb12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weihing JA, Musiek FE, Shinn JB. The effect of presentation level on the Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) test. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18:141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren JD, Jennings AR, Griffiths TD. Analysis of the spectral envelope of sounds by the human brain. NeuroImage. 2005;24:1052–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blesser B. Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation. I. Phonetic characteristics. J Speech Hear Res. 1972;15:5–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinstein BE, Spitzer JB, Ventry IM. Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly. Ear Hear. 1986;7:295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitterick PT, Lovett RE, Goman AM, et al. The ab-york crescent of sound: an apparatus for assessing spatial-listening skills in children and adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 2011;12: 164–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe J, Schafer EC, Heldner B, et al. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009;20:409–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G. Jr., The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112:2086–2098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culling JF, Hawley ML, Litovsky RY. The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;116:1057–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley ML, Litovsky RY, Culling JF. The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115:833–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd G, Mason CR, Best V, et al. Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;128:1965–1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky RY. Speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in young children. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;117: 3091–3099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An overview of current management of auditory processing disorder. British Society of Audiology April 2014; [cited 2014 Sep 30]. Available from: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/BSA_APD_Management_1Aug11_FINAL_amended17Oct11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vorlander M. Sound fields in complex listening environments. Trends Amplif. 2011;15:106–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song JH, Skoe E, Wong PC, et al. Plasticity in the adult human auditory brainstem following short-term linguistic training. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;20:1892–1902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monzani D, Galeazzi GM, Genovese E, et al. Psychological profile and social behaviour of working adults with mild or moderate hearing loss. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008; 28:61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller MK. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol. 2003;42:2S26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MD, Coshall C, Rudd AG, et al. Cognitive impairment after stroke: clinical determinants and its associations with long-term stroke outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50: 700–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider BA. How age affects auditory-cognitive interactions in speech comprehension. Audiology Research, [S.l.], p. e10, mar. 2011. ISSN 2039-4349; [cited 2015 Aug 11]. Available at: <http://audiologyresearch.org/index.php/audio/article/view/audiores.2011.e10>. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2011.e10.
   Google Scholar