Movement rehabilitation: are the principles of re-learning in the recovery of function the same as those of original learning?

References

• WHO. The World Health Report 2001. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor mean in patients following stroke? and mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, et al. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:923–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams JA. Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychol Bull. 1987;101:41–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell KM. Motor skill acquisition. Annu Rev Psychol. 1991;42:213–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA, Lee T. Motor learning and control. 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. New York, NY: Wiley; 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels CF, Carello C. Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Newell KM. Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA, editors. Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1986. p. 341–360.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey MT. Dynamic touch. Am Psychol. 1996;51:1134–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein C, Wing AM, Whitall J. Motor control and learning principles for rehabilitation of upper limb movements after brain injury. In: Graham J, Robertson I, editors. Handbook of neuropsychology. Vol. 9. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2003. p. 75–137.
   Google Scholar
• Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon A, Magill R. Motor learning: application of principles to pediatric rehabilitation. In: Campbell S, Palisano V, Orlin MN, editors. Physical therapy for children. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2011. p. 1511–1574.
   Google Scholar
• Newell K. Coordination, control and skill. In: Goodman D, Franks I, Wilberg R, editors. Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory and control. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 1985. p. 295–317.
   Google Scholar
• Newell KM. Change in movement and skill: learning, retention, and transfer. In: Latash M, Turvey M, editors. Dexterity and its development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996. p. 393–429.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YT, Mayer-Kress G, Newell KM. Qualitative and quantitative change in the dynamics of motor learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2006;32:380–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y-T, Mayer-Kress G, Newell KM. Bi-stability of movement coordination as a function of skill level and task difficulty. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010;36:1515–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan WL, Harter N. Studies on the telegraphic language: the acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychol Rev. 1897;6:345–375.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike EL. Mental work and fatigue and individual differences and their causes [educational psychology, Vol. 3]. New York, NY: Columbia University; 1914.
   Google Scholar
• Keele SW. Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:387–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev. 1975;82:225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi S. Biological learning and control: how the brain builds representations, predicts events, and makes decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler PN, Kelso JS, Turvey M. On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. In: Stelmach GE, Reqiun J, editors. Tutorials in motor behavior. Vol. 3. NewYork, NY: North-Holland; 1980. p. 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler P, Kelso JS, Turvey M. On the control and coordination of naturally developing systems. In: Kelso JS, Clark J, editors. The development of movement control and coordination. NewYork, NY: Wiley; 1982. p. 5–78.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey MT. Coordination. Am Psychol. 1990;45:938–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell K. Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade M, Whiting H, editors. Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1986. p. 3413–3461.
   Google Scholar
• Newell KM, Liu YT, Mayer-Kress G. Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychol Rev. 2001;108:57–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso JS. Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Shenoy KV, Sahani M, Churchland MM. Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2013;36:337–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein NA. The co-ordination and regulation of movements. London, UK: Pergamon; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Amazeen PG, Turvey MT. Intermediate motor learning as decreasing active (dynamical) degrees of freedom. Hum Mov Sci. 1998;17:17–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Ko JH, Challis JH, et al. The degrees of freedom problem in human standing posture: collective and component dynamics. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Morris DM. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001;3:279–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2095–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davids KW, Button C, Bennett SJ. Dynamics of skill acquisition: a constraints-led approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar P, Newell KM. Individual pathways of change: statistical models for analyzing learning and development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson A-C, Gordon AM. Constraint-induced movement therapy for children with hemiplegia. In: Eliasson A-C, Burtner P, editors. Clinics in developmental medicine. London, UK: Mackeith; 2008. p. 1601–1675.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon AM, Hung YC, Brandao M, et al. Bimanual training and constraint-induced movement therapy in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:692–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merzenich MM, Nelson RJ, Stryker MP, et al. Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1984;224:591–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:2144–2149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:3321–3325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull C. Principles of behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1943.
   Google Scholar
• Newell KM, Morris LR, Scully DM. Augmented information and the acquisition of skill in physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1985;13:235–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turvey M. Ecological foundations of cognition: invariants of perception and action. In: Pick H, van den Broek P, Knill D, editors. Cognition: conceptual and methodological issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1992. p. 85–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lee DN. General Tau theory: evolution to date. Perception. 2009;38:837–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turvey MT, Fonseca ST. The medium of haptic perception: a tensegrity hypothesis. J Mot Behav. 2014;46:143–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell KM, Morris LR, Scully DM. Augmented information and the acquisition of skill in physical activity. Exer Sport Sci Rev. 1985;13:235–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newell KM, Ranganathan R. Instructions as constraints in motor skill acquisition. In: Davids KW, Button C, Bennett SJ, editors. Motor learning in practice: a constraints-led approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2010. p. 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kernodle MW, Carlton LG. Information feedback and the learning multiple-degree-of-freedom activities. J Mot Behav. 1992;24:187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar