Outcomes-based research in neurorehabilitation: The need for multidisciplinary team involvement

References

• Wood R. The rehabilitation team, chapter 4. Neurological Rehabilitation, R Greenwood, M P. Barnes, T M. McMillan, C D. Ward. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 1993
   Google Scholar
• Ketelaer P, Battaglia M A. Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis (RIMS). Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop, Milan, March, 8–91991
   Google Scholar
• Williams J G., Roberts R, Rigby M J. Integrated patient records: another move towards quality for patients. Quality in Health Care 1993; 2: 73–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Secretaries of State for Social Services, Wales. Northern Ireland, and Scotland. Promoting Better Health. HMSO, London 1987, (CM249)
   Google Scholar
• Secretaries of State for Health, Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. Working for Patients. HMSO, London 1989, (CM555)
   Google Scholar
• Secretaries of State for Health, Social Security, Wales and Scotland. Caring for People: community care in the next decade and beyond. HMSO, London 1989, (CM849)
   Google Scholar
• Secretary of State for Health. The Health of the Nation. HMSO, London 1991, (CMI523)
   Google Scholar
• Smith R. Rationing: the search for sunlight. British Medical Journal 1991; 303: 1561–1562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D T. Measurement in neurologic rehabilitation. Current Opinion in Neurology 1993; 6: 778–784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles J. Outcomes management and performance indicators. Measuring the Outcomes of Medical Care, A Hopkins, D Costain. Royal College of Physicians, London 1990; 79–91
   Google Scholar
• Clearing House for Information on the Assessment of Health Outcomes. Issues in Outcome Measurement. 1993, Spring Issue
   Google Scholar
• Frater A, Costain D. Any better? Outcome measures in medical audit. British Medical Journal 1992; 304: 519–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harries U, Hill S. Two sides of the coin. Health Service Journal September, 1994; 25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheldon T A. Please bypass the PORT. British Medical Journal 1994; 309: 142–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contemporary issues in aphasia therapy. Aphasia Therapy: historical and contemporary issues, D Howard, F M. Hatfield. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London 1987, section 3
   Google Scholar
• Milner-Brown H S., Miller R G. Muscle strengthening through high resistance weight training in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988; 69: 14–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackley C M., Baguely B I., Gent S, Hodgson P. The use of a balance performance monitor in the treatment of weight bearing and weight transference problems after stroke. Physiotherapy 1992; 78: 907–913
   Google Scholar
• Sutton S. An overview of the management of the C6 quadriplegic patient's hand: an occupational therapist's perspective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1993; 56: 376–380
   Google Scholar
• Pollock C, Freemantle N, Sheldon T, Song F, Mason J M. Methodological difficulties in rehabilitation research. Clinical Rehabilitation 1993; 7: 63–72
   Google Scholar
• Wade D T. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1992
   Google Scholar
• Poser C M., Paty D W., Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Annals of Neurology 1983; 13: 227–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson A J., McDonald W I. Multiple sclerosis and its pathophysiology. Disease of the Nervous System, Clinical Neurobiology, A K. Asbury, G M. McKhann, W I. McDonald. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1992; vol. 2: 1209–1228
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney F I., Barthel D W. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965; 14: 61–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dodds T A., Martin D P., Stolov W G., Dego R A. A valuation of the Functional Independence Measure and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993; 74: 531–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long A F., Dixon P, Hall R, Carr-Hill R A., Sheldon T A. The outcomes agenda: contribution of the UK clearing house on health outcomes. Quality in Health Care 1993; 2: 49–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoln N B., McGuirk E, Mulley G P., Lendrem W, Jones A C., Mitchell J R. Effectiveness of speech therapy for aphasic stroke patients; a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1984; 1: 1197–1200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman A, Rowntree F, Smith L, Chambers C, Russell R, Chiperfield E, Ryan C. Letter: Speech therapy for the stroke patient. Lancet 1984; 2: 104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D. District health Authorities Project: Epidemiologically based needs assessment. February, 1992, Report 3: Stroke. NHS Management Executive
   Google Scholar
• Howard D. Beyond randomised controlled trials: the case for effective case studies of the effects of treatment in aphasia. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1986; 21: 89–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson B A. How do we know that rehabilitation works. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1993; 3: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood R. Neurology and rehabilitation in the United Kingdom: a view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Neuropsychiatry 1992; 55: 51–53, (Suppl.)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. WHO, Geneva 1980
   Google Scholar
• Badley E M. An introduction to the concepts and classifications of the International Classification of Impairments. Disabilities, and Handicaps. Disability and Rehabilitation 1993; 15: 161–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hermanova H M. Need for a data base on consequences of diseases. International Rehabilitation Medicine 1985; 7: 61–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, Johnson J, Rossitor D, Petrucketvitch A, Thompson A J. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 10–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood R H., Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Quality in Health Care 1994; 3: 11–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar