Fitting a quart into a black box: Keyworking in quasi-coercive drug treatment in England

References

• Anglin MD, Brecht M-L, Maddahian E. Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology 1989; 27(3)537–557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball J, Schaffer J, Nurco D. The day to day criminality of heroin addicts in baltimore–A study in the community of offence rates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1983; 12: 119–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett T. Drugs and crime: The results of research on drug testing and interviewing arrestees. Home Office Research Study No. 183. Home Office, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Bennett T. Drugs and crime: The results of the second developmental stage of the NEW-ADAM programme. Home Office Research Study No. 205. Home Office, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bennett T. Recent developments in drug-testing arrestees for research purposes: An English perspective on an international phenomenon. Addiction 2001; 96(6)809–813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Sidwell C, Gossop M, Harris J, Strang J. Crime and expenditure amongst multiple drug misusers seeking treatment: The impact of prescribed methadone and crack on criminal involvement. British Journal of Criminology 2001; 41: 119–126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll K, Rounsaville B. A vision of the next generation of behavioral therapies research in the addictions. Addiction 2007; 102(6)850–862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver J. Drug testing: A necessary prerequisite for treatment and for crime control. Drug treatment: What works?, P Bean, T Nemitz. Routledge, London 2004; 142–77
   Google Scholar
• Casselman J. Grey area between the criminal justice system and the drug treatment system in Belgium. Paper presented at the European Harm Reduction Conference, Urecht, the Netherlands, 3–5 June, as cited by Casselman, J. (2004). Motivation enhancement in clients referred from the criminal justice system. Drug treatment: What works?, P Bean, T Nemitz. Routledge, London 1998; 236–241
   Google Scholar
• Casselman J. Motivation enhancement in clients referred from the criminal justice system. Drug treatment: What works?, P Bean, T Nemitz. Routledge, London 2004; 236–241
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken JM, Chaiken MR. Drugs and predatory crime. Drugs and crime, M Tonry, JQ Wilson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1990; 203–239
   Google Scholar
• Christo G. Outcomes of residential care placements for people with drug and alcohol problems: An evaluation of Hammersmith and Fulham Social Services. The Centre for Research on Drugs and Health Behaviour, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Clark MD. Motivational interviewing for probation staff: Increasing the readiness to change. Federal Probation 2005; 69: 22–28
   Google Scholar
• Coid J, Carvell A, Kittler Z, Healey A, Henderson J. The impact of methadone treatment on drug misuse and crime. Home Office Research Findings no. 120. Home Office, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Curtis NM, Ronan KR, Borduin CM. Multisystemic treatment: A meta-analysis of outcome studies. Journal of Family Psychology 2004; 18(3)411–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day E, Best D, Copello A, Young R, Khoosal, Modern N. Characteristics of drug-using patients and treatment provided in primary and secondary settings. Journal of Substance Use 2007 2007; First Article: 1–9
   Google Scholar
• Eley S, Gallop K, McIvor G, Morgan K, Yates R. Drug treatment and testing orders: Evaluation of the Scottish pilots. Scottish Executive Social Research, Edinburgh 2002
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D, Rolfe A. Reductions in Acquisitive crime and drug use after treatment of addiction problems: 1- Year follow-up outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2000; 58(1–2)165–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Stewart D, Lehmann P, Edwards C, Wilson A, Segar G. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS) in the United Kingdom: Six month follow-up outcomes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviours 1997; 4: 324–337
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard RL, Craddock SG, Flynn PM, Anderson J, Etheridge RM. Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1997; 11(4)261–278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen J, Rowse G, Mathers N, Campbell M, Seivewright N. Can methadone maintenance for heroin-dependent patients retained in general practice reduce criminal conviction rates and time spent in prison?. British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50: 48–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leukefield CG, Tims FM. An introduction to compulsory treatment for drug abuse: Clinical practice and research. NIDA Research Monograph 1988; 86: 1–7
   Google Scholar
• Longshore D, Prendergast M, Farabee D. Coerced treatment for drug-using criminal offenders. Drug treatment: What works?, P Bean, T Nemitz. Routledge, London 2004; 110–122
   Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Arndt IO, Metzger DS, Woody GE, O'Brien CP. The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse treatment. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993; 269(15)1953–1959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan AT. What we need is a system: Creating a responsive and effective substance abuse treatment system. Rethinking substance abuse: What the science shows, and what we should do about it, W Miller, K Carroll. Guildford Press, New York 2006
   Google Scholar
• McSweeney T, Stevens A, Hunt N, Turnbull PJ. Twisting arms or a helping hand? Assessing the impact of ‘coerced’ and comparable ‘voluntary' drug treatment options. British Journal of Criminology 2007; 47(3)470–490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney T, Turnbull P, Hough M. The treatment and supervision of drug-dependent offenders: A review of the literature prepared for the UK Drug Policy Commission. UK Drug Policy Commission, London 2008
   Google Scholar
• Meier PS, Barrowclough C, Donmall MC. The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of substance misuse: A critical review of the literature. Addiction 2005; 100(3)304–316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Drug Abuse. Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations. (NHI Publication No 06-5316). NIDA, RockvilleMaryland 2006
   Google Scholar
• National Probation Directorate. National Standards 2005. Probation Circular 15. Home Office, London 2005a
   Google Scholar
• National Probation Directorate. Effective management of the Drug Rehabilitation Requirement (DRR) and alcohol treatment requirement. Probation Circular 57. Home Office, London 2005b
   Google Scholar
• National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse (NTA). Retaining clients in drug treatment: A guide for providers and commissioners. National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse (NTA). Care planning practice guide 2006, Retrieved August 30, 2007, from http://www.nta.nhs.uk/publications/documents/nta_care_planning_practice_guide_2006_cpg1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb MD, Galaif ER, Carmona JV. The drug-crime nexus among a community sample of adults. Psychology of Addictive Behavior 2001; 15(3)185–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurco DN. Drug addiction and crime: A complicated issue. British Journal of Addiction 1987; 82: 7–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orwin RG, Ellis B, Williams V, Maranda M. Relationships between treatment components, client level factors and positive treatment outcomes. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 2000; 22(2)383–396
   Google Scholar
• Parker H, Kirby P. Methadone maintenance and crime reduction on Merseyside Police. Research group crime detection and prevention series paper 72. Home Office Police Policy Directorate, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Polcin DL, Weisner C. Factors associated with coercion in entering treatment for alcohol problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1999; 54(1)63–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin DL. Drug and alcohol offenders coerced into treatment: A review of modalities and suggestions for research on social model programs. Substance Use & Misuse 2001; 36(5)589–608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast ML, Podus D, Chang E, Urada D. The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2002; 67: 53–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Wilkinson C, Phillips M. The impact of a brief motivational intervention with opiate users attending a methadone programme. Addiction 1995; 90: 415–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secades-Villa R, Fernande-Hermida JR, Arnaez-Montaraz C. Motivational interviewing and treatment retention among drug user patients: A pilot study. Substance Use & Misuse 2004; 39: 1369–1378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon T. Coerced drug treatment in the criminal justice system: Conceptual, ethical and criminological issues. Criminology & Criminal Justice 2007; 7(3)269–286
   Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW, Broome KM. A national 5-year follow-up of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry 2002; 59: 538–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotts AM, Schmitz JM, Rhoades HM, Grabowski J. Motivational interviewing with cocaine-dependent patients: A pilot study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2001; 69: 858–862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull PJ, McSweeney T, Hough M. Drug treatment and testing orders - the 18 month evaluation. Home Office Research Findings No. 128. Home Office, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Wish ED, Gropper BA. Drug testing by the criminal justice system: methods, research and applications. Drugs and Crime, M Tonry, JQ Wilson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1990; 321–391
   Google Scholar