Processivity and substrate-binding in family 18 chitinases

References

• Aam BB, Heggset EB, Norberg AL, Sørlie M, Vårum KM, Eijsink VGH. 2010. Production of chitooligosaccharides and their potential applications in medicine. Marine Drugs 8:1482–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson NN, Halloran BA, Alexyev MF, Amable L, Madura JD, Pasupulati L, Worth C, Van Roey P. 2003. Family 18 chitinase-oligosaccharide substrate interaction: subsite preference and anomer selectivity of Serratia marcescens chitinase A. Biochem J 376:87–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baban J, Fjeld S, Sakuda S, Eijsink VGH, Sørlie M. 2010. The roles of three serratia marcescens chitinases in chitin conversion are reflected in different thermodynamic signatures of allosamidin binding. J Phys Chem B 114:6144–6149.
   Google Scholar
• Baker BM, Murphy KP. 1997. Dissecting the energetics of a protein-protein interaction: the binding of ovomucoid third domain to elastase. J Mol Biol 268:557–569.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin RL. 1986. Temperature dependence of the hydrophobic interaction in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:8069–8072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckham Gregg T, Michael F. Crowley. 2011. Examination of the α-Chitin structure and decrystallization thermodynamics at the nanoscale. J Phys Chem B 115:4516–4522.
   Google Scholar
• Biarnes X, Ardevol A, Planas A, Rovira C, Laio A, Parrinello M. 2007. The conformational free energy landscape of ƒ-D-Glucopyranose. Implications for substrate preactivation in ƒ-Glucoside Hydrolases. J Am Chem Soc 129:10686–10693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ. 2004. Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J 382:769–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozonnet S, Jensen MT, Nielsen MM, Aghajari N Jensen MH, Kramhøft B, Willemoës M, Tranier SL, Haser R, Svensson B. 2007. The ‘pair of sugar tongs’ site on the non-catalytic domain C of barley α-amylase participates in substrate binding and activity. FEBS J 274:5055–5067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breyer WA, Mattthews BW. 2001. A structural basis for processivity. Protein Sci 10:1699–1711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederkvist FH, Parmer MP, Vårum KM, Eijsink VGH, Sørlie M. 2008. Inhibition of a family 18 chitinase by chitooligosaccharides. Carbohyd Polym 74:41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cederkvist FH, Saua SF, Karlsen V, Sakuda S, Eijsink VGH, Sørlie M. 2007. Thermodynamic analysis of allosamidin binding to a family 18 chitinase. Biochemistry 46:12347–12354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper A, Johnson CM, Lakey JH, Nollmann M. 2001. Heat does not come in different colours: entropy-enthalpy compensation, free energy windows, quantum confinement, pressure perturbation calorimetry, solvation and the multiple causes of heat capacity effects in biomolecular interactions. Biophys Chem 93:215–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies G, Henrissat B. 1995. Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Structure 3:853–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies GJ, Tolley SP,Henrissat B,Hjort C, Schulein M. 1995. Structures of oligosaccharide-bound forms of the endoglucanase V from Humicola insolens at 1.9 A resolution. Biochemistry 34:16210–16220.
   Google Scholar
• Divne C, Ståhlberg J, Teeri TT, Alwyn Jones T. 1998. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 Å long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. J Mol Biol 275:309–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnelly LE, Barnes PJ. 2004. Acidic mammalian chitinase – a potential target for asthma therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:509–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunitz JD. 1995. Win some, lose some - Enthalpy-entropy compensation in weak intermolecular interactions. Chem Biol 2:709–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijsink VGH, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Vårum KM, Horn SJ. 2008. Towards new enzymes for biofuels: lessons from chitinase research. Trends Biotechnol 26:228–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harjunpaa V, Teleman A, Koivula A, Ruohonen L, Teeri TT, Teleman O, Drakenberg T. 1996. Cello-oligosaccharide hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Association and rate constants derived from an analysis of progress curves. Eur J Biochem 240:584–591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heggset EB, Hoell IA, Kristoffersen M, Eijsink VG, Vårum KM. 2009. Degradation of chitosans with chitinase G from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): production of chito-oligosaccharides and insight into subsite specificities. Biomacromolecules 10:892–899.
   Google Scholar
• Henrissat B, Davies GJ. 1997. Structural and sequence-based classification of glycoside hydrolases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7:637–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervé C, Rogowski A, Blake AW, Marcus SE, Gilbert HJ, Knox JP. 2010. Carbohydrate-binding modules promote the enzymatic deconstruction of intact plant cell walls by targeting and proximity effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:15293–15298.
   Google Scholar
• Hoell IA, Dalhus B, Heggset EB, Aspmo SI, Eijsink VGH. 2006. Crystal structure and enzymatic properties of a bacterial family 19 chitinase reveal differences from plant enzymes. FEBS J 273:4889–4900.
   Google Scholar
• Horn SJ, Sikorski P, Cederkvist JB, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Sørlie M, Synstad B, Vriend G, Vårum KM, Eijsink VGH. 2006a. Costs and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18089–18094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn SJ, Sørbotten A, Synstad B, Sikorski P, Sørlie M, Vårum KM, Eijsink VGH. 2006b. Endo/exo mechanism and processivity of family 18 chitinases produced by Serratia marcescens. FEBS J 273:491–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn SJ, Sørlie M, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Norberg AL, Synstad B, Vårum KM, Eijsink VGH. 2006c. Comparative studies of chitinases A, B and C from Serratia marcescens Biocatal Biotransfor 24:39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hu GH, Oguro A, Li CZ, Gershon PD, Quiocho FA. 2002. The ‘‘cap-binding slot’’ of an mRNA cap-binding protein: Quantitative effects of aromatic side chain choice in the double-stacking sandwich with cap. Biochemistry 41:7677–7687.
   Google Scholar
• Hult EL, Katouno F, Uchiyama T, Watanabe T, Sugiyama J. 2005. Molecular directionality in crystalline beta-chitin: hydrolysis by chitinases A and B from Serratia marcescens 2170. Biochem J 388:851–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igarashi K, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Penttila M, Samejima M. 2009. High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 284:36186–36190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jalak J, Valjamae P. 2010. Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 106:871–883.
   Google Scholar
• Je JY, Kim EK, Ahn CB, Moon SH, Jeon BT, Kim B, Park TK, Park PJ. 2007. Sulfated chitooligosaccharides as prolyl endopeptidase inhibitor. Int J Biol Macromol 41: 529–533.
   Google Scholar
• Kipper K, Väljamäe P, Johansson G. 2005. Processive action of cellobiohydralese Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei is revealed as “burst” kinetics on fluoroscent polymeric model substrates. Biochem J 385:527–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koivula A, Kinnari T, Harjunpaa V, Ruohonen L, Teleman A, Drakenberg T, Rouvinen J, Jones TA, Teeri TT. 1998. Tryptophan 272: an essential determinant of crystalline cellulose degradation by Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase Cel6A. FEBS Lett 429:341–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurašin M, Väljamäe P. 2011. Processivity of cellobiohydrolases is limited by the substrate. J Biol Chem 286:169–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Irwin DC, Wilson DB. 2007. Processivity, substrate binding, and mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis by Thermobifida fusca Cel9A. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3165–3172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienemann M, Boer H, Paananen A, Cottaz S, Koivula A. 2009. Toward understanding of carbohydrate binding and substrate specificity of a glycosyl hydrolase 18 family (GH-18) chitinase from Trichoderma harzianum. Glycobiology 19:1116–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Lü Y, Yang H, Hu H, Wang Y, Rao Z, Jin C. 2008. Mutation of Trp137 to glutamate completely removes transglycosyl activity associated with Aspergillus fumigatus AfChiB1. Glycoconj J 26:525–534.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie LF, Sulzenbacher G, Divne C, Jones TA, Woldike HF, Schulein M, Withers SG, Davies GJ. 1998. Crystal structure of the family 7 endoglucanase I (Cel7B) from Humicola insolens at 2.2 angstrom resolution and identification of the catalytic nucleophile by trapping of the covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate. Biochem J 335:409–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelman D, Belaich A, Belaich JP, Aghajari N, Driguez H, Haser R. 2003. X-ray crystal structure of the multidomain endoglucanase Cel9G from Clostridium cellulolyticum complexed with natural and synthetic cello-oligosaccharides. J Bacteriol 185:4127–4135.
   Google Scholar
• Merino S, Cherry J. 2007. Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:95–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JE, Schulz GE. 1997. Energy profile of maltooligosaccharide permeation through maltoporin as derived from the structure and from a statistical analysis of saccharide-protein interactions. Protein Sci 6:1084–1091.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy KP. 1994. Hydration and convergence temperatures - on the use and interpretation of correlation plots. Biophys Chem 51:311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Nishio M, Hirota M, Umezwa Y. 1998. The CH/p Interaction: Evidence, Nature, and Consequences. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg AL, Dybvik AI, Zakariassen H, Mormann M, Peter-Katalinić J, Eijsink VGH, Sørlie M. 2011. Substrate positioning in chitinase A, a processive chito-biohydrolase from Serratia marcescens. FEBS Letters DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg AL, Eijsink VGH, Sørlie M. 2010a. Dissecting Factors that Contribute to Ligand-Binding Energetics for Family 18 Chitinases. Thermochim.Acta 511:189–193.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg AL, Karlsen V, Hoell IA, Bakke I, Eijsink VGH, Sørlie M. 2010b. Determination of substrate binding energies in individual subsites of a family 18 chitinase. FEBS Lett 584:4581–4585.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolau Y, Prag G, Tavlas G, Vorgias CE, Oppenheim AB, Petratos K. 2001. High resolution structural analyses of mutant chitinase A complexes with substrates provide new insight into the mechanism of catalysis. Biochemistry 40:11338–11343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanikolau Y, Tavlas G, Vorgias CE, Petratos K. 2003. De novo purification scheme and crystallization conditions yield high-resolution structures of chitinase A and its complex with the inhibitor allosamidin. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography 59:400–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsiegla G, Juy M, Reverbel-Leroy C, Tardif C, Belaich JP, Driguez H, Haser R. 1998. The crystal structure of the processive endocellulase CelF of Clostridium cellulolyticum in complex with a thiooligosaccharide inhibitor at 2.0 angstrom resolution. EMBO J. 17:5551–5562.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsiegla G, Reverbel-Leroy C, Tardif C, Belaich JP, Driguez H, Haser R. 2000. Crystal structures of the cellulase Ce148F in complex with inhibitors and substrates give insights into its processive action. Biochemistry 39:11238–11246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsiegla G, Reverbel C, Tardif C, Driguez H, Haser R. 2008. Structures of mutants of cellulase Cel48F of Clostridium cellulolyticum in complex with long hemithiocellooligosaccharides give rise to a new view of the substrate pathway during processive action. J Mol Biol 375:499–510.
   Google Scholar
• Perrakis A, Tews I, Dauter Z, Oppenheim AB, Chet I, Wilson KS, Vorgias CE. 1994. Crystal structure of a bacterial chitinase at 2.3 A resolution. Structure. 2:1169–1180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quiocho FA. 1989. Protein-Carbohydrate interactions - Basic molecular-features. Pure Appl Chem 61:1293–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman A, Kumar SG, Kim SW, Hwang HJ, Baek YM, Lee SH, Hwang HS, Shon YH, Nam KS, Yun JW. 2008. Proteomic analysis for inhibitory effect of chitosan oligosaccharides on 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation. Proteomics 8:569–581.
   Google Scholar
• Robert X, Haser R, Mori H, Svensson B, Aghajari N. 2005. Oligosaccharide binding to Barley α-Amylase 1. J Biol Chem 280:32968–32978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roby D, Gadelle A, Toppan A. 1987. Chitin oligosaccharides as elicitors of chitinase activity in melon plants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 143:885–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouvinen J, Bergfors T, Teeri T, Knowles JK, Jones TA. 1990. Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Science 249:380–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakon J, Irwin D, Wilson DB, Karplus PA. 1997. Structure and mechanism of endo/exocellulase E4 from Thermomonospora fusca. Nat Struct Mol Biol 4:810–818.
   Google Scholar
• Sikorski P, Sørbotten A, Horn SJ, Eijsink VGH, Vårum KM. 2006. Serratia marcescens chitinases with tunnel-shaped substrate-binding grooves show endo activity and different degrees of processivity during enzymatic hydrolysis of chitosan. Biochemistry 45:9566–9574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørbotten A, Horn SJ, Eijsink VGH, Vårum KM. 2005. Degradation of chitosans with chitinase B from Serratia marcescens. Production of chito-oligosaccharides and insight into enzyme processivity. FEBS J 272:538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spezio M, Wilson DB, Karplus PA. 1993. Crystal-structure of the catalytic domain of a thermophilic endocellulase Biochemistry 32:9906–9916.
   Google Scholar
• Synowiecki J, Al-Khateeb NA. 2003. Production, properties, and some new applications of chitin and its derivatives. Crit Rev Food Sci 43:145–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synstad B, Gåseidnes S, van Aalten DMF, Vriend G, Nielsen JE, Eijsink VGH. 2004. Mutational and computational analysis of the role of conserved residues in the active site of a family 18 chitinase. Eur J Biochem 271:253–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taira T, Fujiwara M, Dennhart N, Hayashi H, Onaga S, Ohnuma T, Letzel T, Sakuda S, Fukamizo T. 2010. Transglycosylation reaction catalyzed by a class V chitinase from cycad, Cycas revoluta: A study involving site-directed mutagenesis, HPLC, and real-time ESI-MS. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins & Proteomics 1804:668–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teeri TT. 1997. Crystalline cellulose degradation: new insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends Biotechnol 15: 160–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwisscha van Scheltinga AC, Armand S, Kalk KH, Isogai A, Henrissat B, Dijkstra BW. 1995. Stereochemistry of chitin hydrolysis by a plant chitinase/lysozyme and X-ray structure of a complex with allosamidin: evidence for substrate assisted catalysis. Biochemistry 34:15619–15623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tews I, Terwisscha van Scheltinga AC, Perrakis A, Wilson KS, Dijkstra BW. 1997. Substrate-assisted catalysis unifies two families of chitinolytic enzymes. J Am Chem Soc 119:7954–7959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchiyama T, Katouno F, Nikaidou N, Nonaka T, Sugiyama J, Watanabe T. 2001. Roles of the exposed aromatic residues in crystalline chitin hydrolysis by chitinase a from Serratia marcescens 2170. J Biol Chem 276:41343–41349.
   Google Scholar
• Vaaje-Kolstad G, Houston DR, Rao FV, Peter MG, Synstad B, van Aalten DMF, Eijsink VGH. 2004. Structure of the D142N mutant of the family 18 chitinase ChiB from Serratia marcescens and its complex with allosamidin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1696:103 111.
   Google Scholar
• van Aalten DMF, Komander D, Synstad B, Gåseidnes S, Peter MG, Eijsink VGH. 2001. Structural insights into the catalytic mechanism of a family 18 exo-chitinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:8979–8984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aalten DMF, Synstad B, Brurberg MB, Hough E, Riise BW, Eijsink VGH, Wierenga RK. 2000. Structure of a two-domain chitotriosidase from Serratia marcescens at 1.9-angstrom resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5842–5847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eijk M, van Roomen CPAA, Renkema GH, Bussink AP, Andrews L, Blommaart EFC, Sugar A, Verhoeven AJ, Boot RG, Aerts JMFG. 2005. Characterization of human phagocyte-derived chitotriosidase, a component of innate immunity. Int Immun 17:1505–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varrot A, Frandsen TP, von Ossowski I, Boyer V, Cottaz S, Driguez H, Schulein M, Davies GJ. 2003. Structural basis for ligand binding and processivity in Cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Humicola insolens. Structure 11:855–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varrot A, Hastrup S, Schülein M, Davies GJ. 1999a. Crystal structure of the catalytic core domain of the family 6 cellobiohydrolase II, Cel6A, from Humicola insolens, at 1.92 A resolution. Biochem J 337:297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varrot A, Schulein M, Davies GJ. 1999b. Structural changes of the active site tunnel of Humicola insolens cellobiohydrolase, Cel6A, upon oligosaccharide binding. Biochemistry 38:8884–8891.
   Google Scholar
• Varrot A, Schulein M, Davies GJ. 2000. Insights into ligand-induced conformational change in Cel5A from Bacillus agaradhaerens revealed by a catalytically active crystal form. J Mol Biol 297:819–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Ossowski I, Stahlberg J, Koivula A, Piens K, Becker D, Boer H, Harle R, Harris M, Divne C, Mahdi S, Zhao Y, Driguez H, Claeyssens M, Sinnott ML, Teeri TT. 2003. Engineering the exo-loop of Trichoderma reesei Cellobiohydrolase, Cel7A. A comparison with Phanerochaete chrysosporium Cel7D. J Mol Biol 333:817–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong TV, Wilson DB. 2009. Processivity, synergism, and substrate specificity of Thermobifida fusca Cel6B. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:6655–6661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas Nand K. 1991. Atomic features of protein-carbohydrate interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1:732–740.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Ito Y, Yamada T, Hashimoto M, Sekine S, Tanaka H. 1994. The roles of the C-Terminal domain and type-Iii domains of Chitinase A1 from Bacillus-Circulans Wl-12 in chitin degradation. J Bacteriol 176:4465–4472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams SJ, Davies GJ. 2001. Protein-carbohydrate interactions: learning lessons from nature. Trends Biotechnol 19:356–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakariassen H, Eijsink VGH, Sørlie M. 2010a. Signatures of activation parameters reveal substrate-dependent rate determining steps in polysaccharide turnover by a family 18 chitinase. Carbohyd Polym 81:14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zakariassen H, Hansen MC, Jøranli M, Eijsink VGH, Sørlie M. 2011. Mutational effects on transglycosylating activity of family 18 chitinases and construction of a hypertransglycosylating mutant. Biochemistry 50:5693–5703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakariassen H, Klemetsen L, Sakuda S, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Vårum KM, Sørlie M, Eijsink VGH. 2010b. Effect of enzyme processivity on the efficacy of a competitive chitinase inhibitor. Carbohyd Polym 82:779–785.
   Google Scholar
• Zakariassen H, Aam BB, Horn SJ, Vårum KM, Sørlie M, Eijsink VGH. 2009. Aromatic residues in the catalytic center of chitinase A from Serratia marcescens affect processivity, enzyme activity, and biomass converting efficiency. J Biol Chem 284:10610–10617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wilson DB. 1997. Surface residue mutations which change the substrate specificity of Thermomonospora fusca endoglucanase E2. J Biotechnol 57:101–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Irwin DC, Escovar-Kousen J, Wilson DB. 2004. Kinetic studies of Thermobifida fusca Cel9A active site mutant enzymes. Biochemistry 43:9655–9663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Zheng T, Homer RJ, Kim YK, Chen NY, Cohn L, Hamid Q, Elias JA. 2004. Acidic mammalian chitinase in asthmatic Th2 inflammation and IL-13 pathway activation. Science 304:1678–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou J, Kleywegt GJ, Stahlberg J, Driguez H, Nerinckx W, Claeyssens M, Koivula A, Teeri TT, Jones TA. 1999. Crystallographic evidence for substrate ring distortion and protein conformational changes during catalysis in cellobiohydrolase Ce16A from trichoderma reesei. Structure 7: 1035–1045.
   Google Scholar