Harmonization in laboratory medicine: Requests, samples, measurements and reports

References

• Plebani M. Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:85–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundberg GD. Acting on significant laboratory results [editorial]. JAMA 1981;245:1762–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M, Laposata M, Lundberg GD. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:829–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarsand AK, Sandberg S. How to achieve harmonisation of laboratory testing-The complete picture. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:8–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panteghini M. Implementation of standardization in clinical practice: not always an easy task. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1237–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:741–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate JR, Johnson R, Sikaris K. Harmonisation of laboratory testing. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:121–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47:101–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M. The CCLM contribution to improvements in quality and patient safety. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:39–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Salle B. Pathology harmony moves on: progress on implementation in haematology. Br J Haematol 2012;158:804–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLawhon RW. Patient safety and clinical effectiveness as imperatives for achieving harmonization inside and outside the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 2011;57:936–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg J, Lane V. Pathology harmony: a pragmatic and scientific approach to unfounded variation in the clinical laboratory. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:195–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossuyt X, Louche C, Wiik A. Standardisation in clinical laboratory medicine: an ethical reflection. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1061–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgeon CM. Common decision limits -the need for harmonised immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:122–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WG, Tate JR, Barth JH, Jones GRD. Harmonization: the sample, the measurement, and the report. Ann Lab Med 2014;34:187–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for Clinical Chemistry. The need to Harmonize Clinical Laboratory Test Result. A White paper of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry, July 2015. Available from: https://www.google.it/search?q=The+need+to+Harmonize+Clinical+Laboratory+Test+Result+A+White+paper+of+the+American+Association+for+Clinical+Chemistry&ie=utf-8&oe=utf8&gws_rd=cr&ei=T6jRVfCIA8m6UdzZg-gE [last accessed 15 Aug 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Plebani M. Laboratory medicine: value for patients is the goal. Clin Chem 2007;53:1873–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellani WJ, Sinard JH, Wilkerson ML, et al. Accreditation and regulatory implications of electronic health records for laboratory reporting. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015;139:328–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson ID, Siodmiak J, Oosterhuis WP, et al. European views on patients directly obtaining their laboratory test results. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1961–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Medical laboratories - particular requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189:2012
   Google Scholar
• Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Chiozza ML, Panteghini M. Once upon a time: a tale of ISO 15189 accreditation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1127–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen MH, Vanstapel FJ, Kroupis C, et al. Flexible scope for ISO 15189 accreditation: a guidance prepared by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO). Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1173–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate JR, Johnson R, Barth JH, Panteghini M. Harmonization of laboratory testing - a global activity. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:1–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M. Clinical laboratories: production industry or medical services? Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:995–1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenti T, Canali C, Scognamiglio A. Clinical governance and evidence-based laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:724–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiozza ML, Plebani M. Clinical governance: from clinical risk management to continuous quality improvement. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:694–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in the US health care. JAMA 2012;307:1513–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody H. From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1949–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi M, Ding EL, Theisen-Toupal J, et al. The landscape of inappropriate laboratory testing: a 15-year meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013;8:e78962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M, Zaninotto M, Faggian D. Utilization management: a European perspective. Clin Chim Acta 2014;427:137–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer AA, Smellie WS. Managing demand for laboratory tests: a laboratory toolkit. J Clin Pathol 2013;66:62–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M, Panteghini M. Promoting clinical and laboratory interaction by harmonization. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:15–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers KM, Venge P, Lindahl B. High-sensitive cardiac troponin T outperforms novel diagnostic biomarkers inpatients with acute chest pain. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:1135–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand-Zaleski I, Rymer JC, Roudot-Thoraval F, et al. Reducing unnecessary laboratory use with new test request form: example of tumour markers. Lancet 1993;342:150–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smellie WS. Time to harmonise common laboratory test profiles. BMJ 2012;344:e1169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker PL, Crook M. Tumour marker requesting in primary care and the role of the laboratory. J Clin Pathol 2011;64:443–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toubert ME, Chevret S, Cassinat B, et al. From guidelines to hospital practice: reducing inappropriate ordering of thyroid hormone and antibody tests. Eur J Endocrinol 2000;142:605–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasikaran S, Cooper C, Eastell R, et al. International Osteoporosis Foundation and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine position on bone marker standards in osteoporosis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1271–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate JR, Johnson R, Barth J, Panteghini M. Harmonization of laboratory testing- current achievements and future strategies. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:4–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Banfi G, Church S, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:357–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procop GW, Keating C, Stagno P, et al. Reducing duplicate testing: a comparison of two clinical decision support tools. Am J Clin Pathol 2015;143:623–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang T. Laboratory demand management of repetitive testing–time for harmonisation and an evidenced based approach. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1139–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelloso M, Fogar P, Padoan A, et al. Automated IT-based interval pop-up (POP-UP) has little impact on Vitamin D (VitD) appropriate minimum retesting. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:eA1–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Brambilla M, Bonelli P, et al. Effectiveness of a computerized alert system based on re-testing intervals for limiting the inappropriateness of laboratory test requests. Clin Biochem 2015;48:1174–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg M, Swanepoel C. The Australian pathology units and terminology standardisation project – an overview. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:103–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magdal U, Dybkaer R, Olesen H. Properties and units in the clinical laboratory sciences, Part XXIII. The NPU terminology, principles and implementation – a user's guide (Technical Report 2011) (IFCC-IUPAC). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50:35–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon BE, Hook J, Vreeman DJ. Learning from the crowd in terminology mapping: the LOINC experience. Lab Med 2015;46:168–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolac N, Supak-Smolcić V, Simundić AM, et al. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine: national recommendations for venous blood sampling. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2013;23:242–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by. venipuncture; approved standard—sixth edition. CLSI Document H3-A6. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; Wayne, PA, USA: 2007
   Google Scholar
• WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599221_eng.pdf [last accessed 19 Jun 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Simundic AM, Cornes MP, Grankvist K, et al. Colour coding for blood collection tube closures - a call for harmonisation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:371–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simundic AM, Cornes M, Grankvist K, et al. Standardization of collection requirements for fasting samples: for the Working Group on Preanalytical Phase (WG-PA) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:33–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simundic AM, Cornes M, Grankvist K, et al. Survey of national guidelines, education and training on phlebotomy in 28 European countries: an original report by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PA). Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1585–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Guidi GC, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:358–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Banfi G, Church S, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:357–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaninotto M, Tasinato A, Padoan A, et al. An integrated system for monitoring the quality of sample transportation. Clin Biochem 2012;45:688–690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaninotto M, Tasinato A, Padoan A, et al. Effects of sample transportation on commonly requested laboratory tests. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1755–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciacovelli L, O'Kane M, Skaik YA, et al. Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety". Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:835–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simundic AM, Nikolac N, Vukasovic I, Vrkic N. The prevalence of preanalytical errors in a Croatian ISO 15189 accredited laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1009–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Plebani M, Di Somma S, Cervellin G. Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2011;48:143–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Becan-McBride K, Behúlová D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:229–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd JM, Krause R, Waite G, et al. Developing optimized automated rule sets for reporting hemolysis, icterus and lipemia based on a priori outcomes analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2015;450:31–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WG, Eckfeldt JH, Passarelli J, et al. Harmonization of test results: what are the challenges; how can we make it better? Clin Chem 2014;60:923–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Working Group 2 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM/WG 2). JCGM 200:2008, International Vocabulary of Metrology — Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). Available from: http://www.iso.org/sites/JCGM/VIM-introduction.htm (2008) [last accessed 20 Aug 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Van Uytfanghe K, De Grande LA, Thienpont LM. A “Step-Up” approach for harmonization. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:62–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg N. Update on current concepts and meanings in laboratory medicine -standardization, traceability and harmonization. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:49–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 17511: 2003 In vitro diagnostic medical devices -measurement of quantities in biological samples – metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and control materials ISO, Geneva, Switzerland; 2003
   Google Scholar
• ISO 18153: 2003 In vitro diagnostic medical devices – measurement of quantities in biological samples - metrological traceability of values for catalytic concentration of enzymes assigned to calibrators and control materials, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Miller WG, Myers GL, Rej R. Why commutability matters. Clin Chem 2006;52:553–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panteghini M. Application of traceability concepts to analytical quality control may reconcile total error with uncertainty of measurement. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:7–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga F, Infusino I, Panteghini M. Performance criteria for combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:905–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klee GG. Harmonization and standardization of thyroid function tests. Clin Chem 2010;56:879–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris HA. Traceability and standardization of immunoassays: a major challenge. Clin Biochem 2009;42:241–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White GH. Metrological traceability in clinical biochemistry. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:393–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houcke SK, Thienpont LM. “Good samples make good assays” – the problem of sourcing clinical samples for a standardization project. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:967–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöckl D, Van Uytfanghe K, Van Aelst S, Thienpont LM. A statistical basis for harmonization of thyroid stimulating hormone immunoassays using a robust factor analysis model. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:965–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerico A, Ripoli A, Zucchelli GC, Plebani M. Harmonization protocols for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) immunoassays: different approaches based on the consensus mean value. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:377–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MJ, Madej RM, Minor P, Kalman LV. Molecular diagnostics: harmonization through reference materials, documentary standards and proficiency testing. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2011;11:741–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madej RM, Davis J, Holden MJ, et al. International standards and reference materials for quantitative molecular infectious disease testing. J Mol Diagn 2010;12:133–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripodi A, Lippi G, Plebani M. How to report results of prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-0657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Cervellin G, Casagranda I, et al. D-dimer testing for suspected venous thromboembolism in the emergency department. Consensus document of AcEMC, CISMEL, SIBioC, and SIMeL. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:621–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard AR. International biological standards for coagulation factors and inhibitors. Semin Thromb Hemost 2007;33:283–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favaloro EJ, Plebani M, Lippi G. Standardization and harmonization of antiphospholipid antibody assays. Semin Thromb Hemost 2014;40:161–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agmon-Levin N, Damoiseaux J, Kallenberg C, et al. International recommendations for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:17–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M. Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:16–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick ES, Holding S. Use of computer terminals on wards to access emergency test results: a retrospective study. BMJ 2001;322:1101–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon EG, Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, et al. “I wish I had seen this test result earlier!” Arch Int Med 2004;164:2223–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder NC, McEwen TR, Flach JM, Gallimore JJ. Management of test results in family medicine offices. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:343–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The International System of Units (SI), 8th ed. Sevres, France: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, 2006. Available from: http://www.bipm.org [last accessed 12 Aug 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Siest G, Henny J, Gräsbeck R, et al. The theory of reference values: an unfinished symphony. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:47–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg HE. IFCC Approved recommendation (1987) on the theory of reference values. Part 5. Statistical treatment of collected reference values. Determination of reference limits. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1987;25:645–56
   Google Scholar
• Dybkaer R, Solberg HE. IFCC approved recommendation on the theory of reference values. Part 6. Presentation of observed values related to reference values. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1987;25:657–62
   Google Scholar
• Horn PS, Pesce AJ. Reference ranges: an update. Clin Chim Acta 2003;334:5–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zardo L, Secchiero S, Sciacovelli L, et al. Reference intervals: are interlaboratory differences appropriate? Clin Chem Lab Med 1999;37:1131–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GR, Barker A, Tate J, et al. The case for common reference intervals. Clin Biochem Rev 2004;25:99–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panteghini M, Ceriotti F. Obtaining reference intervals traceable to reference measurement systems: is it possible, who is responsible, what is the strategy? Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;50:813–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerbin G, Sikaris KA, Jones GR, et al. Evidence-based approach to harmonised reference intervals. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:99–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustad P, Felding P, Franzson L, et al. The Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000: recommended reference intervals for 25 common biochemical properties. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2004;64:271–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichihara K, Ceriotti F, Tam TH, et al. The Asian project for collaborative derivation of reference intervals: (1) strategy and major results of standardized analytes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1429–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeli K, Higgins V, Nieuwesteeg M, et al. Biochemical marker reference values across pediatric, adult, and geriatric ages: establishment of robust pediatric and adult reference intervals on the basis of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Clin Chem 2015;61:1049–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeli K, Raizman JE, Chen Y, et al. Complex biological profile of hematologic markers across pediatric, adult, and geriatric ages: establishment of robust pediatric and adult reference intervals on the basis of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Clin Chem 2015;61:1075–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeli K, Higgins V, Nieuwesteeg M, et al. Complex reference values for endocrine and special chemistry biomarkers across pediatric, adult, and geriatric ages: establishment of robust pediatric and adult reference intervals on the basis of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Clin Chem 2015;61:1063–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate JR, Sikaris KA, Jones GR, et al. Harmonising adult and paediatric reference intervals in Australia and New Zealand: an evidence-based approach for establishing a first panel of chemistry analytes. Clin Biochem Rev 2014;35:213–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones GD, Barker T. Reference intervals. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29:S93–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horowitz GL. The power of asterisks. Clin Chem 2015;61:1009–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser CG. Inherent biological variation and reference values. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004;42:758–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser CG. Reference change values: the way forward in monitoring. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:264–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser CG. Reference change values. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:758–64
   Google Scholar
• Simundic AM, Kackov S, Miler M, et al. Terms and symbols used in studies on biological variation: the need for harmonization. Clin Chem 2015;61:438–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dighe AS, Soderberg BL, Laposata M. Narrative interpretations for clinical laboratory evaluations: an overview. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116:S123–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plebani M. Interpretative commenting: a tool for improving the laboratory-clinical interface. Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:46–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow IM. Do interpretative comments influence patient management and do our users approve of the laboratory ‘adding on' requests? A follow-up General Practitioner and Nurse Practitioner survey. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:85–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasikaran S. Interpretative commenting. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29(Suppl 1):S99–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasikaran SD, Lai LC, Sethi S, et al. Quality of interpretative commenting on common clinical chemistry results in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:963–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laposata M. Patient-specific narrative interpretations of complex clinical laboratory evaluations: who is competent to provide them? Clin Chem 2004;50:471–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim EM, Sikaris KA, Gill J, et al. Quality assessment of interpretative commenting in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 2004;50:632–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aakre KM, Oosterhuis WP, Sandberg S. How do laboratory specialists advise clinicians concerning the use and interpretation of renal tests? Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2012;72:143–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciacovelli L, Zardo L, Secchiero S, et al. Interpretative comments and reference ranges in EQA programs as a tool for improving laboratory appropriateness and effectiveness. Clin Chim Acta 2003;333:209–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall WJ, Challand GS. Provision of interpretative comments on biochemical report forms. Ann Clin Biochem 2000;37:758–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values. Med Lab Obs 1972;4:47–54
   Google Scholar
• Pai M, Moffat KA, Plumhoff E, Hayward CP. Critical values in the coagulation laboratory: results of a survey of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:836–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piva E, Sciacovelli L, Laposata M, Plebani M. Assessment of critical values policies in Italian institutions: comparison with the US situation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:461–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piva E, Pelloso M, Pennello L, Plebani M. Laboratory critical values: automated notification supports effective clinical decision making. Clin Biochem 2014;47:1163–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kost GJ, Hale KN. Global trends in critical values practices and their harmonization. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:167–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CA, Horvath AR. Harmonization of critical result management in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:135–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell C, Horvath A. Towards harmonisation of critical laboratory result management - review of the literature and survey of Australasian practices. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:149–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piva E, Plebani M. Interpretative reports and critical values. Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:52–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M, Zaninotto M, Sciacovelli L, Piva E. Critical laboratory results: communication is just one of the problems. Am J Clin Pathol 2012;137:164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piva E, Plebani M. From “panic” to “critical” values: which path toward harmonization? Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:2069–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don-Wauchope AC, Chetty VT. Laboratory defined critical value limits: how do hospital physicians perceive laboratory based critical values? Clin Biochem 2009;42:766–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novis DA, Dale JC. Morning rounds inpatient test availability: a College of American Pathologist Q-Probes study of 79860 morning complete blood cell count and electrolyte test results in 367 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:499–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M. Does POCT reduce the risk of error in laboratory testing? Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:59–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howanitz JH, Howanitz PJ. Laboratory results. Timeliness as a quality attribute and strategy. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116:311–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahangian S, Snyder SR. Laboratory medicine quality indicators: a review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 2009;131:418–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, et al. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the pre-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:943–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikaris K. Performance criteria of the post-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:949–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, et al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:951–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M. Evaluating laboratory diagnostic tests and translational research. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:983–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M, Marincola FM. Research translation: a new frontier for clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:1303–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WG, Myers GL, Gantzer ML, et al. Roadmap for harmonization of clinical laboratory measurement procedures. Clin Chem 2011;57:1108–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga F, Panteghini M. Verification of in vitro medical diagnostics (IVD) metrological traceability: responsibilities and strategies. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:55–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DGR. Analytical performance specifications for EQA schemes - need for harmonisation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:919–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobbaert C, Weykamp C, Franck P, et al. Systematic monitoring of standardization and harmonization status with commutable EQA-samples - five year experience from the Netherlands. Clin Chim Acta 2012;414:234–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WG, Jones GR, Horowitz GL, Weykamp C. Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. Clin Chem 2011;57:1670–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer D, Krege J, Lane N, et al. National Bone Health Alliance Bone Turnover Marker Project: current practices and the need for US harmonization, standardization, and common reference ranges. Osteoporos Int 2012;23:2425–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasikaran S, Eastell R, Bruyère O, et al. Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards. Osteoporos Int 2011;22:391–420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar