Unraveling the dynamics of protein interactions with quantitative mass spectrometry

References

• Adamson CS, Jones IM. 2004. The molecular basis of HIV capsid assembly—five years of progress. Rev Med Virol 14:107–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal K, Choe LH, Lee KH. 2006. Shotgun proteomics using the iTRAQ isobaric tags. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 5:112–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akiyoshi B, Nelson CR, Ranish JA, Biggins S. 2009. Quantitative proteomic analysis of purified yeast kinetochores identifies a PP1 regulatory subunit. Genes Dev 23:2887–2899.
   Google Scholar
• Alberts B. 1998. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell 92:291–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand GS, Hughes CA, Jones JM, Taylor SS, Komives EA. 2002. Amide H/2H exchange reveals communication between the cAMP and catalytic subunit-binding sites in the R(I)alpha subunit of protein kinase A. J Mol Biol 323:377–386.
   Google Scholar
• Asara JM, Christofk HR, Freimark LM, Cantley LC. 2008. A label-free quantification method by MS/MS TIC compared to SILAC and spectral counting in a proteomics screen. Proteomics 8:994–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, Rick J, Kuster B. 2007. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1017–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrends C, Sowa ME, Gygi SP, Harper JW. 2010. Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature 466:68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger JP, Petro AE, Macnaul KL, Kelly LJ, Zhang BB, Richards K, Elbrecht A, Johnson BA, Zhou G, Doebber TW, Biswas C, Parikh M, Sharma N, Tanen MR, Thompson GM, Ventre J, Adams AD, Mosley R, Surwit RS, Moller DE. 2003. Distinct properties and advantages of a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated protein [gamma] selective modulator. Mol Endocrinol 17:662–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beynon RJ, Pratt JM. 2005. Metabolic labeling of proteins for proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 4:857–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Ong SE, Nielsen M, Foster LJ, Mann M. 2003. A proteomics strategy to elucidate functional protein-protein interactions applied to EGF signaling. Nat Biotechnol 21:315–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobst CE, Abzalimov RR, Houde D, Kloczewiak M, Mhatre R, Berkowitz SA, Kaltashov IA. 2008. Detection and characterization of altered conformations of protein pharmaceuticals using complementary mass spectrometry-based approaches. Anal Chem 80:7473–7481.
   Google Scholar
• Brand M, Ranish JA, Kummer NT, Hamilton J, Igarashi K, Francastel C, Chi TH, Crabtree GR, Aebersold R, Groudine M. 2004. Dynamic changes in transcription factor complexes during erythroid differentiation revealed by quantitative proteomics. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitkreutz A, Choi H, Sharom JR, Boucher L, Neduva V, Larsen B, Lin ZY, Breitkreutz BJ, Stark C, Liu G, Ahn J, Dewar-Darch D, Reguly T, Tang X, Almeida R, Qin ZS, Pawson T, Gingras AC, Nesvizhskii AI, Tyers M. 2010. A global protein kinase and phosphatase interaction network in yeast. Science 328:1043–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busenlehner LS, Armstrong RN. 2005. Insights into enzyme structure and dynamics elucidated by amide H/D exchange mass spectrometry. Arch Biochem Biophys 433:34–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli C, Liang ZX, Strickler M, Prehna G, Goldstein BM, Klinman JP, Bahnson BJ. 2004. Crystal structure and amide H/D exchange of binary complexes of alcohol dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus: insight into thermostability and cofactor binding. Biochemistry 43:5266–5277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra V, Huang P, Hamuro Y, Raghuram S, Wang Y, Burris TP, Rastinejad F. 2008. Structure of the intact PPAR-gamma-RXR–nuclear receptor complex on DNA. Nature 456:350–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZA, Jawhari A, Fischer L, Buchen C, Tahir S, Kamenski T, Rasmussen M, Lariviere L, Bukowski-Wills JC, Nilges M, Cramer P, Rappsilber J. 2010. Architecture of the RNA polymerase II–TFIIF complex revealed by cross-linking and mass spectrometry. EMBO J 29:717–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe L, D’Ascenzo M, Relkin NR, Pappin D, Ross P, Williamson B, Guertin S, Pribil P, Lee KH. 2007. 8-Plex quantitation of changes in cerebrospinal fluid protein expression in subjects undergoing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Proteomics 7:3651–3660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H, Fermin D, Nesvizhskii AI. 2008. Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:2373–2385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H, Larsen B, Lin ZY, Breitkreutz A, Mellacheruvu D, Fermin D, Qin ZS, Tyers M, Gingras AC, Nesvizhskii AI. 2011. SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods 8:70–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corvey C, Koetter P, Beckhaus T, Hack J, Hofmann S, Hampel M, Stein T, Karas M, Entian KD. 2005. Carbon Source-dependent assembly of the Snf1p kinase complex in Candida albicans. J Biol Chem 280:25323–25330.
   Google Scholar
• Cox J, Mann M. 2008. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26:1367–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox J, Matic I, Hilger M, Nagaraj N, Selbach M, Olsen JV, Mann M. 2009. A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat Protoc 4:698–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djordjevic S, Goudreau PN, Xu Q, Stock AM, West AH. 1998. Structural basis for methylesterase CheB regulation by a phosphorylation-activated domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1381–1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engen JR. 2009. Analysis of protein conformation and dynamics by hydrogen/deuterium exchange MS. Anal Chem 81:7870–7875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang L, Wang X, Yamoah K, Chen PL, Pan ZQ, Huang L. 2008. Characterization of the human COP9 signalosome complex using affinity purification and mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 7:4914–4925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields S, Sternglanz R. 1994. The two-hybrid system: an assay for protein–protein interactions. Trends Genet 10:286–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaemmaghami S, Fitzgerald MC, Oas TG. 2000. A quantitative, high-throughput screen for protein stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:8296–8301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gingras AC, Aebersold R, Raught B.. 2005.. Advances in protein complex analysis using mass spectrometry. J Physiol 563 (Pt 1):11–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudreault M, D’Ambrosio LM, Kean MJ, Mullin MJ, Larsen BG, Sanchez A, Chaudhry S, Chen GI, Sicheri F, Nesvizhskii AI, Aebersold R, Raught B, Gingras AC. 2009. A PP2A phosphatase high density interaction network identifies a novel striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase complex linked to the cerebral cavernous malformation 3 (CCM3) protein. Mol Cell Proteomics 8:157–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouw JW, Krijgsveld J, Heck AJ. 2010. Quantitative proteomics by metabolic labeling of model organisms. Mol Cell Proteomics 9:11–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero C, Milenkovic T, Przulj N, Kaiser P, Huang L. 2008. Characterization of the proteasome interaction network using a QTAX-based tag-team strategy and protein interaction network analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13333–13338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerrero C, Tagwerker C, Kaiser P, Huang L. 2006. An integrated mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach: quantitative analysis of tandem affinity-purified in vivo cross-linked protein complexes (QTAX) to decipher the 26 S proteasome-interacting network. Mol Cell Proteomics 5:366–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. 1999. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 17:994–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambly DM, Gross ML. 2005. Laser flash photolysis of hydrogen peroxide to oxidize protein solvent-accessible residues on the microsecond timescale. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 16:2057–2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamuro Y, Coales SJ, Morrow JA, Molnar KS, Tuske SJ, Southern MR, Griffin PR. 2006. Hydrogen/deuterium-exchange (H/D-Ex) of PPARgamma LBD in the presence of various modulators. Protein Sci 15:1883–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamuro Y, Wong L, Shaffer J, Kim JS, Stranz DD, Jennings PA, Woods VL Jr, Adams JA. 2002. Phosphorylation driven motions in the COOH-terminal Src kinase, CSK, revealed through enhanced hydrogen–deuterium exchange and mass spectrometry (DXMS). J Mol Biol 323:871–881.
   Google Scholar
• Hebling CM, Morgan CR, Stafford DW, Jorgenson JW, Rand KD, Engen JR. 2010. Conformational analysis of membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayer nanodiscs by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 82:5415–5419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemming ML, Elias JE, Gygi SP, Selkoe DJ. 2009. Identification of beta-secretase (BACE1) substrates using quantitative proteomics. PLoS ONE 4:e8477.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández H, Robinson CV. 2001. Dynamic protein complexes: insights from mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem 276:46685–46688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipkiss AR. 2006. Accumulation of altered proteins and ageing: causes and effects. Exp Gerontol 41:464–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofnagle AN, Resing KA, Goldsmith EJ, Ahn NG. 2001. Changes in protein conformational mobility upon activation of extracellular regulated protein kinase-2 as detected by hydrogen exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:956–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoopmann MR, Weisbrod CR, Bruce JE. 2010. Improved strategies for rapid identification of chemically cross-linked peptides using protein interaction reporter technology. J Proteome Res 9:6323–6333.
   Google Scholar
• Horn JR, Kraybill B, Petro EJ, Coales SJ, Morrow JA, Hamuro Y, Kossiakoff AA. 2006. The role of protein dynamics in increasing binding affinity for an engineered protein-protein interaction established by H/D exchange mass spectrometry. Biochemistry 45:8488–8498.
   Google Scholar
• Houde D, Arndt J, Domeier W, Berkowitz S, Engen JR. 2009. Characterization of IgG1 conformation and conformational dynamics by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 81:5966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houde D, Peng Y, Berkowitz SA, Engen JR. 2010. Post-translational modifications differentially affect IgG1 conformation and receptor binding. Mol Cell Proteomics 9:1716–1728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubner NC, Bird AW, Cox J, Splettstoesser B, Bandilla P, Poser I, Hyman A, Mann M. 2010. Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions. J Cell Biol 189:739–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes CA, Mandell JG, Anand GS, Stock AM, Komives EA. 2001. Phosphorylation causes subtle changes in solvent accessibility at the interdomain interface of methylesterase CheB. J Mol Biol 307:967–976.
   Google Scholar
• James P, Vorherr T, Carafoli E. 1995. Calmodulin-binding domains: just two faced or multi-faceted? Trends Biochem Sci 20:38–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeffrey PD, Bewley MC, MacGillivray RT, Mason AB, Woodworth RC, Baker EN. 1998. Ligand-induced conformational change in transferrins: crystal structure of the open form of the N-terminal half-molecule of human transferrin. Biochemistry 37:13978–13986.
   Google Scholar
• Kaake RM, Milenkovic T, Przulj N, Kaiser P, Huang L. 2010a. Characterization of cell cycle specific protein interaction networks of the yeast 26S proteasome complex by the QTAX strategy. J Proteome Res 9:2016–2029.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaake RM, Wang X, Huang L. 2010b. Profiling of protein interaction networks of protein complexes using affinity purification and quantitative mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 9:1650–1665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallenberger BC, Love JD, Chatterjee VK, Schwabe JW. 2003. A dynamic mechanism of nuclear receptor activation and its perturbation in a human disease. Nat Struct Biol 10:136–140.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltashov IA, Zhang M, Eyles SJ, Abzalimov RR. 2006. Investigation of structure, dynamics and function of metalloproteins with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 386:472–481.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann J. 2008. ICPL—isotope-coded protein label. Methods Mol Biol 424:113–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilhoffer MC, Kubina M, Travers F, Haiech J. 1992. Use of engineered proteins with internal tryptophan reporter groups and pertubation techniques to probe the mechanism of ligand–protein interactions: investigation of the mechanism of calcium binding to calmodulin. Biochemistry 31:8098–8106.
   Google Scholar
• Kito K, Kawaguchi N, Okada S, Ito T. 2008. Discrimination between stable and dynamic components of protein complexes by means of quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 8:2366–2370.
   Google Scholar
• Kline KG, Finney GL, Wu CC. 2009. Quantitative strategies to fuel the merger of discovery and hypothesis-driven shotgun proteomics. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 8:114–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konermann L, Douglas DJ. 1997. Acid-induced unfolding of cytochrome c at different methanol concentrations: electrospray ionization mass spectrometry specifically monitors changes in the tertiary structure. Biochemistry 36:12296–12302.
   Google Scholar
• Konermann L, Tong X, Pan Y. 2008. Protein structure and dynamics studied by mass spectrometry: H/D exchange, hydroxyl radical labeling, and related approaches. J Mass Spectrom 43:1021–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratchmarova I, Blagoev B, Haack-Sorensen M, Kassem M, Mann M. 2005. Mechanism of divergent growth factor effects in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science 308:1472–1477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühner S, Gavin AC. 2007. Towards quantitative analysis of proteome dynamics. Nat Biotechnol 25:298–300.
   Google Scholar
• Lanman J, Lam TT, Barnes S, Sakalian M, Emmett MR, Marshall AG, Prevelige PE Jr. 2003. Identification of novel interactions in HIV-1 capsid protein assembly by high-resolution mass spectrometry. J Mol Biol 325:759–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CM, Tyler PC, Furneaux RH, Kicska G, Xu Y, Grubmeyer C, Girvin ME, Schramm VL. 1999. Transition-state analogs as inhibitors of human and malarial hypoxanthine–guanine phosphoribosyltransferases. Nat Struct Biol 6:582–587.
   Google Scholar
• Linse S, Helmersson A, Forsén S. 1991. Calcium binding to calmodulin and its globular domains. J Biol Chem 266:8050–8054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren DH, Hwang SI, Wu L, Han DK. 2010. Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics 7:39–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malovannaya A, Li Y, Bulynko Y, Jung SY, Wang Y, Lanz RB, O’Malley BW, Qin J. 2010. Streamlined analysis schema for high-throughput identification of endogenous protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:2431–2436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcsisin SR, Engen JR. 2010. Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry: what is it and what can it tell us? Anal Bioanal Chem 397:967–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina H, Yang Y, Ruch T, Kim JW, Mortensen P, Otto T, Nalli A, Tang QQ, Lane MD, Chaerkady R, Pandey A. 2009. Temporal profiling of the adipocyte proteome during differentiation using a five-plex SILAC based strategy. J Proteome Res 8:48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousson F, Kolkman A, Pijnappel WW, Timmers HT, Heck AJ. 2008. Quantitative proteomics reveals regulation of dynamic components within TATA-binding protein (TBP) transcription complexes. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:845–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeljeklaus S, Meyer HE, Warscheid B. 2009. New dimensions in the study of protein complexes using quantitative mass spectrometry. FEBS Lett 583:1674–1683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M. 2002. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 1:376–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paoletti AC, Parmely TJ, Tomomori-Sato C, Sato S, Zhu D, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Florens L, Washburn MP. 2006. Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian Mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18928–18933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SK, Venable JD, Xu T, Yates JR 3rd. 2008. A quantitative analysis software tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods 5:319–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SK, Yates JR 3rd. 2010. Census for proteome quantification. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 13:Unit 13.12.1–Unit 13.1211.
   Google Scholar
• Pavelka N, Fournier ML, Swanson SK, Pelizzola M, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Florens L, Washburn MP. 2008. Statistical similarities between transcriptomics and quantitative shotgun proteomics data. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:631–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflieger D, Jünger MA, Müller M, Rinner O, Lee H, Gehrig PM, Gstaiger M, Aebersold R. 2008. Quantitative proteomic analysis of protein complexes: concurrent identification of interactors and their state of phosphorylation. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:326–346.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puts CF, Lenoir G, Krijgsveld J, Williamson P, Holthuis JC. 2010. A P4-ATPase protein interaction network reveals a link between aminophospholipid transport and phosphoinositide metabolism. J Proteome Res 9:833–842.
   Google Scholar
• Ranish JA, Hahn S, Lu Y, Yi EC, Li XJ, Eng J, Aebersold R. 2004. Identification of TFB5, a new component of general transcription and DNA repair factor IIH. Nat Genet 36:707–713.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rinner O, Mueller LN, Hubálek M, Müller M, Gstaiger M, Aebersold R. 2007. An integrated mass spectrometric and computational framework for the analysis of protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 25:345–352.
   Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, Williamson B, Parker K, Hattan S, Khainovski N, Pillai S, Dey S, Daniels S, Purkayastha S, Juhasz P, Martin S, Bartlet-Jones M, He F, Jacobson A, Pappin DJ. 2004. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 3:1154–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardiu ME, Cai Y, Jin J, Swanson SK, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Florens L, Washburn MP. 2008. Probabilistic assembly of human protein interaction networks from label-free quantitative proteomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1454–1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardiu ME, Florens L, Washburn MP. 2009a. Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein complex and protein interaction network assembly. J Proteome Res 8:2944–2952.
   Google Scholar
• Sardiu ME, Gilmore JM, Carrozza MJ, Li B, Workman JL, Florens L, Washburn MP. 2009b. Determining protein complex connectivity using a probabilistic deletion network derived from quantitative proteomics. PLoS ONE 4:e7310.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Kellermann J, Lottspeich F. 2005. A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope-coded protein labels. Proteomics 5:4–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt-Ulms G, Hansen K, Liu J, Cowdrey C, Yang J, DeArmond SJ, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB, Baldwin MA. 2004. Time-controlled transcardiac perfusion cross-linking for the study of protein interactions in complex tissues. Nat Biotechnol 22:724–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selbach M, Mann M. 2006. Protein interaction screening by quantitative immunoprecipitation combined with knockdown (QUICK). Nat Methods 3:981–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp JS, Becker JM, Hettich RL. 2004. Analysis of protein solvent accessible surfaces by photochemical oxidation and mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 76:672–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp JS, Becker JM, Hettich RL. 2003. Protein surface mapping by chemical oxidation: structural analysis by mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 313:216–225.
   Google Scholar
• Shi W, Li CM, Tyler PC, Furneaux RH, Cahill SM, Girvin ME, Grubmeyer C, Schramm VL, Almo SC. 1999. The 2.0 A structure of malarial purine phosphoribosyltransferase in complex with a transition-state analogue inhibitor. Biochemistry 38:9872–9880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms SA, Keane MG, Stock J. 1985. Multiple forms of the CheB methylesterase in bacterial chemosensing. J Biol Chem 260:10161–10168.
   Google Scholar
• Sinz A. 2006. Chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry to map three-dimensional protein structures and protein–protein interactions. Mass Spectrom Rev 25:663–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinz A. 2007. Investigation of protein–ligand interactions by mass spectrometry. ChemMedChem 2:425–431.
   Google Scholar
• Sinz A. 2010. Investigation of protein–protein interactions in living cells by chemical crosslinking and mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 397:3433–3440.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sowa ME, Bennett EJ, Gygi SP, Harper JW. 2009. Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell 138:389–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spisák S, Guttman A. 2009. Biomedical applications of protein microarrays. Curr Med Chem 16:2806–2815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter B, Kittanakom S, Stagljar I. 2008. Two-hybrid technologies in proteomics research. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:316–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland BW, Toews J, Kast J. 2008. Utility of formaldehyde cross-linking and mass spectrometry in the study of protein–protein interactions. J Mass Spectrom 43:699–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stitt BL, Xiao H. 2010. Conformation changes in E. coli Rho monitored by hydrogen/deuterium exchange and mass spectrometry: response to ligand binding. J Mol Biol 402:813–824.
   Google Scholar
• Tackett AJ, DeGrasse JA, Sekedat MD, Oeffinger M, Rout MP, Chait BT. 2005. I-DIRT, a general method for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein interactions. J Proteome Res 4:1752–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainer JA, Roberts VA, Getzoff ED. 1992. Protein metal-binding sites. Curr Opin Biotechnol 3:378–387.
   Google Scholar
• Takamoto K, Chance MR. 2006. Radiolytic protein footprinting with mass spectrometry to probe the structure of macromolecular complexes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 35:251–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang X, Bruce JE. 2010. A new cross-linking strategy: protein interaction reporter (PIR) technology for protein–protein interaction studies. Mol Biosyst 6:939–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsutsui Y, Wintrode PL. 2007. Hydrogen/deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry: a powerful tool for probing protein structure, dynamics and interactions. Curr Med Chem 14:2344–2358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasilescu J, Guo X, Kast J. 2004. Identification of protein–protein interactions using in vivo cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 4:3845–3854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wales TE, Engen JR. 2006. Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry for the analysis of protein dynamics. Mass Spectrom Rev 25:158–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Li W, Emmett MR, Hendrickson CL, Marshall AG, Zhang YL, Wu L, Zhang ZY. 1998. Conformational and dynamic changes of Yersinia protein tyrosine phosphatase induced by ligand binding and active site mutation and revealed by H/D exchange and electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Biochemistry 37:15289–15299.
   Google Scholar
• Wang F, Shi W, Nieves E, Angeletti RH, Schramm VL, Grubmeyer C. 2001a. A transition-state analogue reduces protein dynamics in hypoxanthine–guanine phosphoribosyltransferase. Biochemistry 40:8043–8054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Lane LC, Smith DL. 2001b. Detecting structural changes in viral capsids by hydrogen exchange and mass spectrometry. Protein Sci 10:1234–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Huang L. 2008. Identifying dynamic interactors of protein complexes by quantitative mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:46–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson MP, Sutcliffe MJ. 2010. Protein–protein interactions. Biochem Soc Trans 38:875–878.
   Google Scholar
• Wintrode PL, Friedrich KL, Vierling E, Smith JB, Smith DL. 2003. Solution structure and dynamics of a heat shock protein assembly probed by hydrogen exchange and mass spectrometry. Biochemistry 42:10667–10673.
   Google Scholar
• Xu G, Chance MR. 2007. Hydroxyl radical-mediated modification of proteins as probes for structural proteomics. Chem Rev 107:3514–3543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu P, Duong DM, Seyfried NT, Cheng D, Xie Y, Robert J, Rush J, Hochstrasser M, Finley D, Peng J. 2009. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 137:133–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Friedman A, Nagpal S, Perrimon N, Asara JM. 2009. Use of a label-free quantitative platform based on MS/MS average TIC to calculate dynamics of protein complexes in insulin signaling. J Biomol Tech 20:272–277.
   Google Scholar
• Zal T. 2008. Visualization of protein interactions in living cells. Adv Exp Med Biol 640:183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu MM, Chitta R, Gross ML. 2005. PLIMSTEX: a novel mass spectrometric method for the quantification of protein–ligand interactions in solution. Int J Mass Spectrom 240:213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu MM, Rempel DL, Du Z, Gross ML. 2003a. Quantification of protein–ligand interactions by mass spectrometry, titration, and H/D exchange: PLIMSTEX. J Am Chem Soc 125:5252–5253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu MM, Rempel DL, Zhao J, Giblin DE, Gross ML. 2003b. Probing Ca2+-induced conformational changes in porcine calmodulin by H/D exchange and ESI-MS: effect of cations and ionic strength. Biochemistry 42:15388–15397.
   Google Scholar
• Zlatic SA, Ryder PV, Salazar G, Faundez V. 2010. Isolation of labile multi-protein complexes by in vivo controlled cellular cross-linking and immuno-magnetic affinity chromatography. J Vis Exp 37:pii1855.
   Google Scholar
• Zybailov B, Mosley AL, Sardiu ME, Coleman MK, Florens L, Washburn MP. 2006. Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 5:2339–2347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar