References
- El-Galaly T, Prakash V, Christiansen I, et al. Efficacy of routine surveillance with positron emission tomography/computed tomography in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma in complete remission: status in a single center. Leuk Lymphoma 2011;52: 597–603.
- Zinzani PL, Stefoni V, Tani M, et al. Role of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in the follow-up of lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1781–1787.
- Maeda LS, Horning SJ, Iagaru AH, et al. Role of FDG-PET/CT surveillance for patients with classical Hodgkin's disease in first complete response: the Stanford University experience. Blood 2010;114(Suppl. 1): Abstract 1563.
- Lee AI, Zuckerman DS, van den Abbeele AD, et al. Surveillance imaging of Hodgkin lymphoma patients in first remission: a clinical and economic analysis. Cancer 2010;116:3835–3842.
- Radford JA, Eardley A, Woodman C, Crowther D. Follow up policy after treatment for Hodgkin's disease: too many clinic visits and routine tests? A review of hospital records. BMJ 1997;314:343–346.
- Guppy AE, Tebbutt NC, Norman A, Cunningham D. The role of surveillance CT scans in patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2003;44:123–125.
- Petrausch U, Samaras P, Veit-Haibach P, et al. Hodgkin's lymphoma in remission after first-line therapy: which patients need FDG-PET/CT for follow-up? Ann Oncol 2010;21:1053–1057.