Strategies on the nuclear-targeted delivery of genes

References

• Goldstein I, Marcel V, Olivier M, et al. Understanding wild-type and mutant p53 activities in human cancer: new landmarks on the way to targeted therapies. Cancer Gene Ther 2011;18:2–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover DJ, Leyton DL, Moseley GW, et al. The efficiency of nuclear plasmid DNA delivery is a critical determinant of transgene expression at the single cell level. J Gene Med 2010;12:77–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen RN, van der Aa MA, Macaraeg N, et al. Quantification of plasmid DNA copies in the nucleus after lipoplex and polyplex transfection. J Control Release 2009;135:166–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won YY, Sharma R, Konieczny SF. Missing pieces in understanding the intracellular trafficking of polycation/DNA complexes. J Control Release 2009;139:88–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woese CR. On the evolution of cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:8742–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiethoff CM, Middaugh CR. Barriers to nonviral gene delivery. J Pharm Sci 2003;92:203–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogris M, Wagner E. Targeting tumors with non-viral gene delivery systems. Drug Discov Today 2002;7:479–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collard WT, Yang Y, Kwok KY, et al. Biodistribution metabolism and in vivo gene expression of low molecular weight glycopeptide polyethylene glycol peptide DNA co-condensates. J Pharm Sci 2000;89:499–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircheis R, Blessing T, Brunner S, et al. Tumor targeting with surface-shielded ligand-polycation DNA complexes. J Control Release 2001;72:165–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oupicky D, Howard KA, Konák  C, et al. Steric stabilization of poly-L-lysine/DNA complexes by the covalent attachment of semitelechelic poly [N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide]. Bioconjugate Chem 2000;11:492–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders N, Rudolph C, Braeckmans K, et al. Extracellular barriers in respiratory gene therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009;61:115–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters L, Sanders NN, Demeester J, et al. Challenges in non-viral ocular gene transfer. Biochem Soc Trans 2007;35:47–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Wong E, Miller D, et al. Lentiviral airway gene transfer in lungs of mice and sheep: successes and challenges. J Gene Med 2010;12:647–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvvuri S, Majumdar S, Mitra AK. Drug delivery to the retina: challenges and opportunities. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2003;3:45–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders NN, Peeters L, Lentacker I, et al. Wanted and unwanted properties of surface PEGylated nucleic acid nanoparticles in ocular gene transfer. J Control Release 2007;122:226–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh EJ, Park K, Kim KS, et al. Target specific and long-acting delivery of protein peptide and nucleotide therapeutics using hyaluronic acid derivatives. J Control Release 2010;141:2–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goda T, Goto Y, Ishihara K. Cell-penetrating macromolecules: direct penetration of amphipathic phospholipid polymers across plasma membrane of living cells. Biomaterials 2010;31:2380–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta B, Levchenko TS, Torchilin VP. Intracellular delivery of large molecules and small particles by cell-penetrating proteins and peptides. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57:637–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midoux P, Breuzard G, Gomez JP, et al. Polymer-based gene delivery: a current review on the uptake and intracellular trafficking of polyplexes. Curr Gene Ther 2008;8:335–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahay G, Alakhova DY, Kabanov AV. Endocytosis of nanomedicines. J Control Release 2010;145:182–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejman J, Conese M, Hoekstra D. Gene transfer by means of lipo- and polyplexes: role of clathrin and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. J Liposome Res 2006;16:237–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper A, Shaul Y. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis and lysosomal cleavage of hepatitis B virus capsid-like core particles. J Biol Chem 2006;281:16563–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Szoka FC Jr. Mechanism of DNA release from cationic liposome/DNA complexes used in cell transfection. Biochemistry 1996;35:5616–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonez C, Lensink MF, Kleiren E, et al. Fusogenic activity of cationic lipids and lipid shape distribution. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010;67:483–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuhorn IS, Bakowsky U, Polushkin E, et al. Nonbilayer phase of lipoplex-membrane mixture determines endosomal escape of genetic cargo and transfection efficiency. Mol Ther 2005;11:801–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayed A, Masuda T, Khalil I, et al. Enhanced gene expression by a novel stearylated INF7 peptide derivative through fusion independent endosomal escape. J Control Release 2009;138:160–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JH, Quan JS, Kwon JT, et al. Fabrication of a novel core-shell gene delivery system based on a brush-like polycation of α β–poly (L-aspartate-graft-PEI). Pharm Res 2009;26:2152–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayed A, Khalil IA, Kogure K, et al. Octaarginine- and octalysine-modified nanoparticles have different modes of endosomal escape. J Biol Chem 2008;283:23450–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore NM, Sheppard CL, Sakiyama-Elbert SE. Characterization of a multifunctional PEG-based gene delivery system containing nuclear localization signals and endosomal escape peptides. Acta Biomater 2009;5:854–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auguste DT, Furman K, Wong A, et al. Triggered release of siRNA from poly(ethylene glycol)-protected pH-dependent liposomes. J Control Release 2008;130:266–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauty E, Verkman AS. Actin cytoskeleton as the principal determinant of size-dependent DNA mobility in cytoplasm: a new barrier for non-viral gene delivery. J Biol Chem 2005;280:7823–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan EE, Dean DA. Intracellular trafficking of plasmids during transfection is mediated by microtubules. Mol Ther 2006;13:422–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesika A, Kiss V, Brumfeld V, et al. Enhanced intracellular mobility and nuclear accumulation of DNA plasmids associated with a karyophilic protein. Hum Gene Ther 2005;16:200–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokokawa R, Tarhan MC, Kon T, et al. Simultaneous and bidirectional transport of kinesin-coated microspheres and dynein-coated microspheres on polarity-oriented microtubules. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008;101:1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Aa MA, Mastrobattista E, Oosting RS, et al. The nuclear pore complex: the gateway to successful nonviral gene delivery. Pharm Res 2006;23:447–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck M, Lucić V, Förster F, et al. Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography. Nature 2007;449:611–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King MC, Lusk CP, Blobel G. Karyopherin-mediated import of integral inner nuclear membrane proteins. Nature 2006;442:1003–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panté N, Kann M. Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of about 39 nm. Mol Biol Cell 2002;13:425–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liashkovich I, Meyring A, Kramer A, et al. Exceptional structural and mechanical flexibility of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Physiol 2011;226:675–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry LJ, Wente SR. Flexible gates: dynamic topologies and functions for FG nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Eukaryot Cell 2009;8:1814–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigg EA. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: signals mechanisms and regulation. Nature 1997;386:779–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke B. Cell biology: nuclear pore complex models gel. Science 2006;314:766–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb DS, Corbett AH, Mason DA, et al. Importin alpha: a multipurpose nuclear-transport receptor. Trends Cell Biol 2004;14:505–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang FM, Lin YC, Hu MC. Identification of two functional nuclear localization signals mediating nuclear import of liver receptor homologue-1. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011;68:1241–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel A, Forbes DJ. Importin beta: conducting a much larger cellular symphony. Mol Cell 2004;16:319–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Yu J, Zhuo X, et al. Pericentrin contains five NESs and an NLS essential for its nucleocytoplasmic trafficking during the cell cycle. Cell Res 2010;20:948–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth DM, Moseley GW, Glover D, et al. A microtubule-facilitated nuclear import pathway for cancer regulatory proteins. Traffic 2007;8:673–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldib M, Dean DA. Cyclic stretch of alveolar epithelial cells alters cytoskeletal micromechanics. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011;108:446–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley GW, Roth DM, DeJesus MA, et al. Dynein light chain association sequences can facilitate nuclear protein import. Mol Biol Cell 2007;18:3204–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsigny M, Rondanino C, Duverger E, et al. Glyco-dependent nuclear import of glycoproteins glycoplexes and glycosylated plasmids. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004;1673:94–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller AM, Dean DA. Cell-specific nuclear import of plasmid DNA in smooth muscle requires tissue-specific transcription factors and DNA sequences. Gene Ther 2008;15:1107–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmott E, Hiscox JA. Nucleolar targeting: the hub of the matter. EMBO Rep 2009;10:231–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudhakir D, Harashima H. Learning from the viral journey: how to enter cells and how to overcome intracellular barriers to reach the nucleus. AAPSJ 2009;11:65–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissenhorn W, Hinz A, Gaudin Y. Virus membrane fusion. FEBS Lett 2007;581:2150–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonca LS, Firmino F, Moreira JN, et al. Transferrin receptor-targeted liposomes encapsulating anti-BCR-ABL siRNA or asODN for chronic myeloid leukemia treatment. Bioconjug Chem 2010;21:157–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppu S, Oh YJ, Edrada-Ebel R, et al. Tumor regression after systemic administration of a novel tumor-targeted gene delivery system carrying a therapeutic plasmid DNA. J Control Release 2010;143:215–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Sun YX, Qu W, et al. Biotinylated transferrin/avidin/biotinylated disulfide containing PEI bioconjugates mediated p53 gene delivery system for tumor targeted transfection. Biomaterials 2010;31:4771–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Gao S, Jiang W, et al. Targeted minicircle DNA delivery using folate-poly(ethylene glycol)-polyethylenimine as non-viral carrier. Biomaterials 2010;31:6075–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris VB, Sharma CP. Folate mediated in vitro targeting of depolymerized trimethylated chitosan having arginine functionality. J Colloid Interface Sci 2010;348:360–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeeley KM, Karathanasis E, Annapragada AV, et al. Masking and triggered unmasking of targeting ligands on nanocarriers to improve drug delivery to brain tumors. Biomaterials 2009;30:3986–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oba M, Miyata K, Osada K, et al. Polyplex micelles prepared from [omega]-cholesteryl PEG-polycation blockcopolymers for systemic gene delivery. Biomaterials 2011;32:652–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo KI, Tai A, Lee CL, et al. Imaging multiple intermediates of single-virus membrane fusion mediated by distinct fusion proteins. Microsc Res Tech 2010;73:886–900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee M, Speir JA, Kwan MH, et al. Structure and function of a genetically engineered mimic of a nonenveloped virus entry intermediate. J Virol 2010;84:4737–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold PL, Crystal RG. Intracellular trafficking of adenovirus: many means to many ends. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007;59:810–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FitzGerald DJ, Padmanabhan R, Pastan I, et al. Adenovirus-induced release of epidermal growth factor and pseudomonas toxin into the cytosol of KB cells during receptor-mediated endocytosis. Cell 1983;32:607–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JL, Hope TJ. Intracellular trafficking of retroviral vectors: obstacles and advances. Gene Ther 2005;12:1667–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang KL, Higuchi Y, Kawakami S, et al. Efficient gene transfection by histidine-modified chitosan through enhancement of endosomal escape. Bioconjug Chem 2010;21:1087–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakase I, Kobayashi S, Futaki S. Endosome-disruptive peptides for improving cytosolic delivery of bioactive macromolecules. Biopolymers 2010;94:763–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim MS, Kwon YJ. Acid-transforming polypeptide micelles for targeted nonviral gene delivery. Biomaterials 2010;31:3404–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi S, Nakase I, Kawabata N, et al. Cytosolic targeting of macromolecules using a pH-dependent fusogenic peptide in combination with cationic liposomes. Bioconjug Chem 2009;20:953–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong SY, Sood N, Putnam D. Combinatorial evaluation of cations pH-sensitive and hydrophobic moieties for polymeric vector design. Mol Ther 2009;17:480–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Behzad AR, Carroll JB, et al. Parvoviral nuclear import: bypassing the host nuclear-transport machinery. J Gen Virol 2006;87:3209–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan GS, Preuss MA, Williams JC, et al. The dynein light chain 8 binding motif of rabies virus phosphoprotein promotes efficient viral transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:7229–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen JM, Pun SH. Evaluation of an LC8-binding peptide for the attachment of artificial cargo to dynein. Mol Pharm 2007;4:119–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell EM, Hope TJ. Role of the cytoskeleton in nuclear import. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2003;55:761–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahato RI. Non-viral peptide-based approaches to gene delivery. J Drug Target 1999;7:249–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield VA. DNA condensation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:334–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRouchey J, Hoover B, Rau DC. A comparison of DNA compaction by arginine and lysine peptides: a physical basis for arginine rich protamines. Biochemistry 2013;52:3000–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin ME, Rice KG. Peptide-guided gene delivery. AAPS J 2007;9:E18–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga CM, Wickham TJ, Lauffenburger DA. Receptor-mediated targeting of gene delivery vectors: Insights from molecular mechanisms for improved vehicle design. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000;70:593–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwa MS, Collard WT, Adami RC, et al. Peptide-mediated gene delivery: influence of peptide structure on gene expression. Bioconjug Chem 1997;8:81–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie DL, Collard WT, Rice KG. Comparative gene transfer efficiency of low molecular weight polylysine DNA-condensing peptides. J Pept Res 1999;54:311–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haines AM, Irvine AS, Mountain A, et al. CL22 -- a novel cationic peptide for efficient transfection of mammalian cells. Gene Ther 2001;8:99–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temsamani J, Vidal P. The use of cell-penetrating peptides for drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 2004;9:1012–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardarelli F, Serresi M, Albanese A, et al. Quantitative analysis of Tat peptide binding to import carriers reveals unconventional nuclear transport properties. J Biol Chem 2011;286:12292–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de la Fuente JM, Berry CC. Tat peptide as an efficient molecule to translocate gold nanoparticles into the cell nucleus. Bioconjug Chem 2005;16:1176–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Nicol F, Szoka FC Jr. GALA: a designed synthetic pH-responsive amphipathic peptide with applications in drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004;56:967–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani F, Sankian M, Hatefi A, et al. Development of a novel histone H1-based recombinant fusion peptide for targeted non-viral gene delivery. Int J Pharm 2013;441:307–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yi WJ, Yang J, Li C, et al. Enhanced nuclear import and transfection efficiency of TAT peptide-based gene delivery systems modified by additional nuclear localization signals. Bioconjug Chem 2012;23:125–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MS, Huang YH, Huang SP, et al. Identification of a nuclear localization signal in the polo box domain of Plk1. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1793:1571–8
   Google Scholar
• Kosugi S, Hasebe M, Matsumura N, et al. Six classes of nuclear localization signals specific to different binding grooves of importin α. J Biol Chem 2009;284:478–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremner KH, Seymour LW, Logan A, et al. Factors influencing the ability of nuclear localization sequence peptides to enhance nonviral gene delivery. Bioconjug Chem 2004;15:152–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Han JS, Kim HA, et al. Expression purification and characterization of TAT-high mobility group box-1A peptide as a carrier of nucleic acids. Biotechnol Lett 2008;30:1331–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff KM, Glover DJ, Tremethick DJ, et al. Histone-mediated transduction as an efficient means for gene delivery. Mol Ther 2007;15:721–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaouass M, Beaulieu R, Balicki D. Histonefection: novel and potent non-viral gene delivery. J Control Release 2006;113:245–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephson L, Tung CH, Moore A, et al. High-efficiency intracellular magnetic labeling with novel superparamagnetic-Tat peptide conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 1999;10:186–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin M, Carlesso N, Tung CH, et al. Tat peptide-derivatized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and recovery of progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:410–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchilin VP, Rammohan R, Weissig V, et al. TAT peptide on the surface of liposomes affords their efficient intracellular delivery even at low temperature and in the presence of metabolic inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:8786–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchilin VP, Levchenko TS, Rammohan R, et al. Cell transfection in vitro and in vivo with nontoxic TAT peptide-liposome-DNA complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:1972–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta B, Levchenko TS, Torchilin VP. TAT peptide-modified liposomes provide enhanced gene delivery to intracranial human brain tumor xenografts in nude mice. Oncol Res 2007;16:351–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph C, Schillinger U, Ortiz A, et al. Application of novel solid lipid nanoparticle (SLN)-gene vector formulations based on a dimeric HIV-1 TAT-peptide in vitro and in vivo. Pharm Res 2004;21:1662–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Li W, MacKay JA, et al. Thiocholesterol–basedlipids for ordered assembly of bioresponsive gene carriers. Mol Ther 2005;11:409–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleemann E, Neu M, Jekel N, et al. Nano-carriers for DNA delivery to the lung based upon a TAT-derived peptide covalently coupled to PEG-PEI. J Control Release 2005;109:299–316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai WF, Tang GP, Wang X, et al. Cyclodextrin-PEI-Tat polymer as a vector for plasmid DNA delivery to placenta mesenchymal stem cells. Bionanoscience 2011;1:89–96
   Google Scholar
• Aronsohn AI, Hughes JA. Nuclear localization signal peptides enhance cationic liposome-mediated gene therapy. J Drug Target 1998;5:163–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachibana R, Harashima H, Shono M, et al. Intracellular regulation of macromolecules using pH-sensitive liposomes and nuclear localization signal: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of intracellular trafficking. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998;251:538–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin J, Meng X, Zhang S, et al. The effect of a nuclear localization sequence on transfection efficacy of genes delivered by cobalt(II)-polybenzimidazole complexes. Biomaterials 2012;33:7884–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanazawa T, Takashima Y, Murakoshi M, et al. Enhancement of gene transfection into human dendritic cells using cationic PLGA nanospheres with a synthesized nuclear localization signal. Int J Pharm 2009;379:187–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen Y, Peng H, Deng J, et al. High mobility group box 1 protein enhances polyethylenimine mediated gene delivery in vitro. Int J Pharm 2009;375:140–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Peng H, Pan S, et al. Interaction of DNA/nuclear protein/polycation and the terplexes for gene delivery. Nanotechnology 2010;21:45–102
   Google Scholar
• Kastrup L, Oberleithner H, Ludwig Y, et al. Nuclear envelope barrier leak induced by dexamethasone. J Cell Physiol 2006;206:428–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi Bae Y, Choi H, Lee S, et al. Dexamethasone-conjugated low molecular weight polyethylenimine as a nucleus-targeting lipopolymer gene carrier. Bioconjug Chem 2007;18:2029–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JS, Ko KS, Park JS, et al. Dexamethasone conjugated poly(amidoamine) dendrimer as a gene carrier for efficient nuclear translocation. Int J Pharm 2006;320:171–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fan Y, Yao J, Du R, et al. Ternary complexes with core-shell bilayer for double level targeted gene delivery: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Pharm Res 2013;30:1215–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Yao J, Zhou J. Nucleus-targeting polyethyleneimine-dexamethasone conjugates for gene delivery. Chem J Chin U 2011;32:2916–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh AT, Evens AM, Anderson RJ, et al. All trans retinoic acid nanodisks enhance retinoic acid receptor mediated apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in mantle cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2010;150:158–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schug TT, Berry DC, Shaw NS, et al. Opposing effects of retinoic acid on cell growth result from alternate activation of two different nuclear receptors. Cell 2007;129:723–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KM, Kang HC, Cho JK, et al. All-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA)-grafted polymeric gene carriers for nuclear translocation and cell growth control. Biomaterials 2009;30:2642–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoensit P, Kawakami S, Higuchi Y, et al. Enhanced growth inhibition of metastatic lung tumors by intravenous injection of ATRA-cationic liposome/IL-12 pDNA complexes in mice. Cancer Gene Ther 2010;17:512–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Chen YC, Tseng YC, et al. Biodegradable calcium phosphate nanoparticle with lipid coating for systemic siRNA delivery. J Control Release 2010;142:416–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Li J, Liu F, et al. Systemic delivery of siRNA via LCP nanoparticle efficiently inhibits lung metastasis. Mol Ther 2012;20:609–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Yang Y, Huang L. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles with an asymmetric lipid bilayer coating for siRNA delivery to the tumor. J Control Release 2012;158:108–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitra A. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles: second-generation nonviral vectors in gene therapy. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2005;5:893–905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisht S, Bhakta G, Mitra S, et al. pDNA loaded calcium phosphate nanoparticles: highly efficient non-viral vector for gene delivery. Int J Pharm 2005;288:157–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Haynes MT, Wang Y, et al. A highly efficient synthetic vector: nonhydrodynamic delivery of DNA to hepatocyte nuclei in vivo. ACS Nano 2013;7:5376--84
   Google Scholar
• Trump BF, Berezesky IK. Calcium-mediated cell injury and cell death. FASEB J 1995;9:219–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogure K, Akita H, Harashima H. Multifunctional envelope-type nano device for non-viral gene delivery: concept and application of programmed packaging. J Control Release 2007;122:246–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil IA, Kogure K, Futaki S, et al. Octaarginine-modified multifunctional envelope-type nanoparticles for gene delivery. Gene Ther 2007;14:682–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y, Kogure K, Yamada Y,et al. Significant and prolonged antisense effect of a multifunctional envelope-type nano device encapsulating antisense oligodeoxynucleotide. J Pharm Pharmacol 2006;58:431–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada Y, Nomura T, Harashima H, et al. Intranuclear DNA release is a determinant of transfection activity for a non-viral vector: biocleavable polyrotaxane as a supramolecularly dissociative condenser for efficient intranuclear DNA release. Biol Pharm Bull 2010;33:1218–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akita H, Kudo A, Minoura A, et al. Multi-layered nanoparticles for penetrating the endosome and nuclear membrane via a step-wise membrane fusion process. Biomaterials 2009;30:2940–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar