Serum influence on in-vitro gene delivery using microbubble-assisted ultrasound

References

• Gill DR, Pringle IA, Hyde SC. Progress and prospects: the design and production of plasmid vectors. Gene Ther 2009;16:165–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Teissie J, Rols MP. Gene transfer: how can the biological barriers be overcome? J Membr Biol 2010;236:61–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff JA, Malone RW, Williams P, et al. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Science 1990;247:1465–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwerdt JI, Goya GF, Calatayud MP, et al. Magnetic field-assisted gene delivery: achievements and therapeutic potential. Curr Gene Ther 2012;12:116–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teissie J, Escoffre JM, Paganin A, et al. Drug delivery by electropulsation: recent developments in oncology. Int J Pharm 2012;423:3–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castle J, Butts M, Healey A, Kent K, et al. Ultrasound-mediated targeted drug delivery: recent success and remaining challenges. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2013;304:H350–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Zeghimi A, Novell A, Bouakaz A. In-vivo gene delivery by sonoporation: recent progress and prospects. Curr Gene Ther 2013;13:2–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin KH, Dayton PA. Current status and prospects for microbubbles in ultrasound theranostics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2013;5:329–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azmin M, Harfield C, Ahmad Z, et al. How do microbubbles and ultrasound interact? Basic physical, dynamic and engineering principles. Curr Pharm Des 2012;18:2118–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doinikov AA, Bouakaz A. Acoustic microstreaming around a gas bubble. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;127:703–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohl CD, Ikink R. Shock-wave-induced jetting of micron-size bubbles. Phys Rev Lett 2003;90:214502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.214502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohl CD, Arora M, Ikink R, De Jong N, et al. Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. Biophys J 2006;91:4285–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Novell A, Serriere S, et al. Irinotecan delivery by microbubble-assisted ultrasound: in vitro validation and a pilot preclinical study. Mol Pharm 2013;10:2667–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath CH, Sorace A, Knowles J, et al. Microbubble therapy enhances anti-tumor properties of cisplatin and cetuximab in vitro and in vivo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146:938–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwanaga K, Tominaga K, Yamamoto K, et al. Local delivery system of cytotoxic agents to tumors by focused sonoporation. Cancer Gene Ther 2007;14:354–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotopoulis S, Dimcevski G, Gilja OH, et al. Treatment of human pancreatic cancer using combined ultrasound, microbubbles, and gemcitabine: a clinical case study. Med Phys 2013;40:072902. doi: 10.1118/1.4808149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Huang CW, Wu J, et al. The use of cationic microbubbles to improve ultrasound-targeted gene delivery to the ischemic myocardium. Biomaterials 2013;34:2107–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke CW, Suk JS, Kim AJ, et al. Markedly enhanced skeletal muscle transfection achieved by the ultrasound-targeted delivery of non-viral gene nanocarriers with microbubbles. J Control Release 2012;162:414–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Gao YH, Tan KB, et al. Inhibition of hepatic fibrosis with artificial microRNA using ultrasound and cationic liposome-bearing microbubbles. Gene Ther 2013;20:1140–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deelman LE, Decleves AE, Rychak JJ, Sharma K. Targeted renal therapies through microbubbles and ultrasound. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2010;62:1369–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirsi SR, Hernandez SL, Zielinski L, et al. Polyplex-microbubble hybrids for ultrasound-guided plasmid DNA delivery to solid tumors. J Control Release 2012;157:224–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentacker I, De Cock R, Deckers R, et al. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derieppe M, Yudina A, Lepetit-Coiffe M, et al. Real-time assessment of ultrasound-mediated drug delivery using fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy. Mol Imaging Biol 2013;15:3–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijering BD, Juffermans LJ, Van Wamel A, et al. Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation. Circ Res 2009;104:679–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, et al. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J Control Release 2006;112:149–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvshani-Eshet M, Baruch L, Kesselman E, et al. Therapeutic ultrasound-mediated DNA to cell and nucleus: bioeffects revealed by confocal and atomic force microscopy. Gene Ther 2006;13:163–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JL, Lo CW, Inserra C, Bera JC, Chen WS. Ultrasound enhanced PEI-mediated gene delivery through increasing the intracellular calcium level and PKC-delta. Protein Expr Pharm Res 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s11095-014-1332-4
   Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Piron J, Novell A, Bouakaz A. Doxorubicin delivery into tumor cells with ultrasound and microbubbles. Mol Pharm 2011;8:799–806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Gao Y, Liu Z, et al. DNA transfection of bone marrow stromal cells using microbubble-mediated ultrasound and polyethylenimine: an in vitro study. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013;66:775–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XH, Zhou P, Wang LH, et al. The targeted gene (KDRP-CD/TK) therapy of breast cancer mediated by SonoVue and ultrasound irradiation in vitro. Ultrasonics 2012;52:186–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Mannaris C, Geers B, et al. Doxorubicin liposome-loaded microbubbles for contrast imaging and ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2013;60:78–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijering BD, Henning RH, Van Gilst WH, et al. Optimization of ultrasound and microbubbles targeted gene delivery to cultured primary endothelial cells. J Drug Target 2007;15:664–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon CS, Jung HS, Kim TK, et al. Comparison of the efficiency and toxicity of sonoporation with branched polyethylenimine-mediated gene transfection in various cultured cell lines. J Drug Target 2008;16:773–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran M, Wheatley MA. In vitro gene delivery with ultrasound-triggered polymer microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013;39:1102–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Kaddur K, Rols MP, Bouakaz A. In vitro gene transfer by electrosonoporation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010;36:1746–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips LC, Klibanov AL, Wamhoff BR, Hossack JA. Targeted gene transfection from microbubbles into vascular smooth muscle cells using focused, ultrasound-mediated delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010;36:1470–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalli R, Bisazza A, Trotta M, et al. New chitosan nanobubbles for ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: preparation and in vitro characterization. Int J Nanomedicine 2012;7:3309–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tros De Ilarduya C, Sun Y, Duzgunes N. Gene delivery by lipoplexes and polyplexes. Eur J Pharm Sci 2010;40:159–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delteil C, Teissie J, Rols MP. Effect of serum on in vitro electrically mediated gene delivery and expression in mammalian cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000;1467:362–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosnjak M, Lorente BC, Pogacar Z, et al. Different incubation times of cells after gene electrotransfer in fetal bovine serum affect cell viability, but not transfection efficiency. J Membr Biol 2014;247:421–8
   Google Scholar
• Schneider M. Characteristics of SonoVuetrade mark. Echocardiography 1999;16:743–746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider M. SonoVue, a new ultrasound contrast agent. Eur Radiol 1999;9:S347–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider M, Arditi M, Barrau MB, et al. BR1: a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubbles. Invest Radiol 1995;30:451–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Nikolova B, Mallet L, et al. New insights in the gene electrotransfer process: evidence for the involvement of the plasmid DNA topology. Curr Gene Ther 2012;12:417–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamanauskas N, Novell A, Escoffre JM, et al. Bleomycin delivery into cancer cells in vitro with ultrasound and SonoVue(R) or BR14(R) microbubbles. J Drug Target 2013;21:407–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Novell A, Piron J, et al. Microbubble attenuation and destruction: are they involved in sonoporation efficiency? IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2013;60:46–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Portet T, Favard C, et al. Electromediated formation of DNA complexes with cell membranes and its consequences for gene delivery. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1808:1538–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaddur K, Lebegue L, Tranquart F, et al. Transient transmembrane release of green fluorescent proteins with sonoporation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2010;57:1558–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman K, Foppen-Harteveld M, Van Der Steen AF, De Jong N. Sonoporation of endothelial cells by vibrating targeted microbubbles. J Control Release 2011;154:35–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill IR, Garnett MC, Bignotti F, Davis SS. Determination of protection from serum nuclease activity by DNA-polyelectrolyte complexes using an electrophoretic method. Anal Biochem 2001;291:62–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosazza C, Escoffre JM, Zumbusch A, Rols MP. The actin cytoskeleton has an active role in the electrotransfer of plasmid DNA in mammalian cells. Mol Ther 2011;19:913–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf H, Rols MP, Boldt E, et al. Control by pulse parameters of electric field-mediated gene transfer in mammalian cells. Biophys J 1994;66:524–31
   Google Scholar
• Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH. Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: kinetics of plasmid internalization and gene expression. J Control Release 2005;104:203–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherng JY, Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek NM, Jiskoot W, et al. Effect of DNA topology on the transfection efficiency of poly((2-dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)-plasmid complexes. J Control Release 1999;60:343–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanoya A, Chain BM, Keshavarz-Moore E. Role of DNA topology in uptake of polyplex molecules by dendritic cells. Vaccine 2012;30:1675–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remaut K, Sanders NN, Fayazpour F, et al. Influence of plasmid DNA topology on the transfection properties of DOTAP/DOPE lipoplexes. J Control Release 2006;115:335–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J Control Release 2005;104:213–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeghimi A, Uzbekov R, Arbeille B, et al. Ultrasound modifications of cell membranes and organelles induced by sonoporation. Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), IEEE International, Dresden; 2012:2045–2048. doi: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0511
   Google Scholar
• Robertson RM, Laib S, Smith DE. Diffusion of isolated DNA molecules: dependence on length and topology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:7310–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen H, Hu Y, Saltzman WM. DNA diffusion in mucus: effect of size, topology of DNAs, and transfection reagents. Biophys J 2006;91:639–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechardeur D, Sohn KJ, Haardt M, et al. Metabolic instability of plasmid DNA in the cytosol: a potential barrier to gene transfer. Gene Ther 1999;6:482–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie TD, Tsong TY. Study of mechanisms of electric field-induced DNA transfection. V. Effects of DNA topology on surface binding, cell uptake, expression, and integration into host chromosomes of DNA in the mammalian cell. Biophys J 1993;65:1684–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechardeur D, Lukacs GL. Nucleocytoplasmic transport of plasmid DNA: a perilous journey from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Hum Gene Ther 2006;17:882–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechardeur D, Lukacs GL. Intracellular barriers to non-viral gene transfer. Curr Gene Ther 2002;2:183–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dowty ME, Williams P, Zhang G, et al. Plasmid DNA entry into postmitotic nuclei of primary rat myotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:4572–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukacs GL, Haggie P, Seksek O, et al. Size-dependent DNA mobility in cytoplasm and nucleus. J Biol Chem 2000;275:1625–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seksek O, Biwersi J, Verkman AS. Translational diffusion of macromolecule-sized solutes in cytoplasm and nucleus. J Cell Biol 1997;138:131–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabot S, Orio J, Schmeer M, et al. Minicircle DNA electrotransfer for efficient tissue-targeted gene delivery. Gene Ther 2013;20:62–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darquet AM, Rangara R, Kreiss P, et al. Minicircle: an improved DNA molecule for in vitro and in vivo gene transfer. Gene Ther 1999;6:209–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss P, Cameron B, Rangara R, et al. Plasmid DNA size does not affect the physicochemical properties of lipoplexes but modulates gene transfer efficiency. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:3792–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer F, Christensen CL, Poulsen TT, et al. Insertion of a nuclear factor kappa B DNA nuclear-targeting sequence potentiates suicide gene therapy efficacy in lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Gene Ther 2012;19:675–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan EE, Dean DA. Intracellular trafficking of plasmids during transfection is mediated by microtubules. Mol Ther 2006;13:422–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan EE, Degiulio JV, Dean DA. Intracellular trafficking of plasmids for gene therapy: mechanisms of cytoplasmic movement and nuclear import. Curr Gene Ther 2006;6:671–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golzio M, Teissie J, Rols MP. Cell synchronization effect on mammalian cell permeabilization and gene delivery by electric field. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002;1563:23–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentacker I, Vandenbroucke RE, Lucas B, et al. New strategies for nucleic acid delivery to conquer cellular and nuclear membranes. J Control Release 2008;132:279–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Tachibana R, Okamoto A, et al. Ultrasound-mediated gene transfection in vitro: effect of ultrasonic parameters on efficiency and cell viability. Int J Hyperthermia 2012;28:290–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Luo Y, Zhang Y, et al. The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro. J Control Release 2010;145:40–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang CB, Cao HL, Li Q, et al. Enhancement effect of ultrasound-induced microbubble cavitation on branched polyethylenimine-mediated VEGF(165) transfection with varied N/P ratio. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013;39:161–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentacker I, Wang N, Vandenbroucke RE, et al. Ultrasound exposure of lipoplex loaded microbubbles facilitates direct cytoplasmic entry of the lipoplexes. Mol Pharm 2009;6:457–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nomikou N, Tiwari P, Trehan T, et al. Studies on neutral, cationic and biotinylated cationic microbubbles in enhancing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater 2012;8:1273–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panje CM, Wang DS, Pysz MA, et al. Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery with cationic versus neutral microbubbles: effect of DNA and microbubble dose on in vivo transfection efficiency. Theranostics 2012;2:1078–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar