Development of bioadhesive buccal tablets for felodipine and pioglitazone in combined dosage form: In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo characterization

References

• Actos. (2004). Product information for Actos. Available online at: http://www.actos.com/pi.pdf, accessed 20 December 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Anders, R., Merkle, H.P. (1989). Evaluation of laminated mucoadhesive patches for buccal drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 49:231–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukaert, S., Lefebvre, R.A., Remon, J.P. (1993). In vitro/in vivo correlation of the bioadhesive properties of a buccal bioadhesive miconazole slow-release tablet. Pharm Res. 10:853–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra Sekhar, K., Naidu, K.V.S., Vamshi Vishnu, Y., Ramesh, G., Kishan, V., Madhusudan Rao, Y. (2008). Transbuccal delivery of chlorpheniramine maleate from mucoadhesive buccal patches. Drug Delivery. 15:195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Chinna Reddy, P., Ramesh, G., Vamshi Vishnu, Y., Shravan Kumar, Y., Madhusudan Rao, Y. (2010). Development of bilayered mucoadhesive patches for buccal delivery of felodipine: in vitro and ex vivo characterization. Curr Trends Biotech Pharm. 4:673–83.
   Google Scholar
• Eckland, D.A., Danhof, M. (2000). Clinical pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 108:234–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, B., Collste, P., Haglund, K., Regardh, C.G. (1987). Pharmacokinetics and haemodynamic effects of felodipine as monotherapy in hypertensive patients. Clin Invest Med. 10:388–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emami, J. (2006). In vitro-in vivo correlations: from theory to applications. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 9:31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiras, A., Hombach, J., Veiga, F., Bernkop-Schnürch, A. (2009). In vitro evaluation of natural and methylated cyclodextrins as buccal permeation enhancing system for omeprazole delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 71:339–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida, M., Nambu, N., Nagai, T. (1983). Highly viscous gel ointment containing Carbopol for application to the oral mucosa. Chem Pharm Bull. 31:4561–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaakkola, T., Backman, J.T., Neuvonen, M., Laitila, J., Neuvonen, P.J. (2005). Effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of Pioglitazone. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 61:70–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafar, A., Ali, N., Djavad, F., Massoud, A., Mohammad, R.S.S., Majid, S. (2004). Development and evaluation of buccoadhesive propranolol hydrochloride tablet formulations: effect of fillers. Farmaco. 59:155–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karavas, E., Ktistis, G., Xenakis, A., Georgarakis, E. (2005). Miscibility behaviour and formation mechanism of stabilized felodipine polyvinyl pyrrolidone amorphous nanodispersions. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 31:473–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, R., Agarwal, S.P., Ahuja, A. (1997). Mucoadhesive buccal tablets of clotrimazol for oral candidiasis. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 23:831–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer, R.W., Guruy, R., Doelker, E., Buri, P., Peppas, N.A. (1983). Mechanism of solute release from porous polymers. Int J Pharm. 15:25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langoth, N., Bernkop-Schnürch, A., Kurka, P. (2005). In vitro evaluation of various buccal permeation enhancing systems for PACAP (pituitary adenylate cyclose activating polypeptide). Pharm Res. 22:2045–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mario, J., Mira, B.L. (2004). Influence of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin complexation on piroxicam release from buccoadhesive tablets. Eur J Pharm Sci. 21:251–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narendra, C., Srinath, M.S., Prakash Rao, B. (2005). Development of three layered buccal compact containing metoprolol tartrate by statistical optimization technique. Int J Pharm. 304:102–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, T.S., Dansereau, R.J., Sakr, A. (2005). Development and evaluation of extended release bioadhesive sodium fluoride tablets. Int J Pharm. 288:109–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parodi, B., Russo, E., Gatti, P., Cafaggi, S., Bignardi, G. (1999). Development and in vitro evaluation of buccoadhesive tablets using a new model substrate for bioadhesion measures: the eggshell membrane. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 25:289–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathbone, M.J., Ponchel, G., Chazali, F.A. (1996). Systemic oral mucosal drug delivery and delivery systems. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Shanker, G., Kumar, C.K., Chandra Sekhara Rao, G., Vijaya Kumar, B., Prabhakar Reddy, V. (2009). Formulation and evaluation of bioadhesive buccal drug delivery of tizanidine hydrochloride tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech. 10:530–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhakar, Y., Kuotsu, K., Bandyopadhyay, A.K. (2006). Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery - A promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J Contr Rel. 114:15–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, I.G. (1988). A method to study the kinetics of oral mucosal drug absorption from solutions. J Pharm Pharmacol. 40:679–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamshi Vishnu, Y., Chandrasekhar, K., Ramesh, G., Madhusudan Rao, Y. (2007a). Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of carvedilol. Curr Drug Del. 4:27–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vamshi Vishnu, Y., Ramesh, G., Chandrasekhar, K., Bhanoji Rao, M.E., Madhusudan Rao, Y. (2007b). Development and in vitro evaluation of buccoadhesive carvedilol tablets. Acta Pharm. 57:185–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wertz, P.W., Squier, C.A. (1991). Cellular and molecular basis of barrier function in oral epithelium. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 8:237–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar