REFERENCES
- Arrow, K. J. (1951), [2nd ed., 1963]. Social choice and individual values. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-01364-7
- Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. The American Political Science Review, 57, 632–642. Retrieved January 2012, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1952568.
- Blane, D. (2001). A view from outside. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 25–26.
- Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.
- Carlson, R. G. (2001). Harm reduction from a broader political-economic perspective. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 15–17.
- Cooper, H. L. F., Des Jarlais, D. C., Ross, Z., Tempalski, B., Bossak, B., & Friedman, S. R. (2012). Spatial access to sterile syringes and the odds of injecting with an unsterile syringe among injectors: A longitudinal multilevel study. Journal of Urban Health. [Epub ahead of print].
- Cooper, H. L. F., Des Jarlais, D. C., Tempalski, B., Bossak, B., Ross, Z., & Friedman, S. R. (2012). Drug-related arrest rates and spatial access to syringe exchange programs in New York City health districts: Combined effects on the risk of injection-related infections among injectors. Health and Place, 18(2): 218–228.
- Durkheim, E. (1895), [1950]. The rules of sociological method. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
- Friedman, S. R. (1998). The political economy of drug-user scapegoating—And the philosophy and politics of resistance. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 5(1), 15–32.
- Friedman, S. R., Cooper, H. L. F., Tempalski, B., Keem, M., Friedman, R., Flom, P. L., (2006). Relationships of deterrence and law enforcement to drug-related harms among drug injectors in U.S.A. metropolitan areas. AIDS, 20(1), 93–99.
- Friedman, S. R., Pouget, E. R., Chatterjee, S., Cleland, C. M., Tempalski, B., Brady, J. E., (2011). Drug arrests and injection drug deterrence. American Journal of Public Health, 101(6), 1118–1125.
- Friedman, S. R., Schneider, E., & Latkin, C. (2012). What we do not know about organizations of people who use drugs. Substance Use & Misuse, 47(5), 568–572.
- Friedman, S. R., Southwell, M., Bueno, R., Paone, D., Byrne, J., & Crofts, N. (2001). Harm reduction—A historical view from the left. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 3–14.
- Friedman, S. R, Southwell, M., Crofts, N., Paone, D., Byrne, J., & Bueno, R. (2001). Harm reduction—A historical view from the left: A response to commentaries. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 259–263.
- Global Commission on Drug Policy. (June 2011). Report of the global commission on drug policy. Retrieved January 3, 2012, from http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/Report.
- Hunt, N. (2001). The importance of clearly communicating the essence of harm reduction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 35–36.
- International Drug Policy Consortium. (2010). Drug policy guide. Retrieved January 6, 2012, from http://www.idpc.net/ sites/default/files/library/IDPC%20Drug%20Policy%20Guide_ Version%201.pdf.
- Machiavelli, N. (1999). The prince ( translated by George Bull). New York: Penguin.
- Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, V, 904–913.
- Phillips, K. (1969). The emerging republican majority. New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House.
- Reinarman, C. (2001). Capitalism, prohibitionism, and the drug policy reform movement: Theses on Friedman et al. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 19–23.
- Ross, T. (2001). Notes from South America. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 27–30.
- Rossi, D. (2001). Harm reduction alliances in an Argentinean context. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 31–33.
- Scott, J. (2001). Class, alliances and harm reduction: A personal view. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 37–40.
- Wiebel, W. (2001). Harm reduction—A historical view from the trenches. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 41–43.