Failures in Substance Use Surveys

REFERENCES

• Adlaf, E. M., Begin, P., & Sawka, E. (Eds.). (2005). Canadian Addiction Survey (CAS): A national survey of Canadians’ use of alcohol and other drugs: Prevalence of use and related harms: Detailed report. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Aquilino, J. S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 210–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradburn, N. M., & Sudman, S. (1979). Improving interview method and questionnaire design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Caetano, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & McGrath, C. (2003). Characteristics of non-respondents in a U.S. national longitudinal survey on drinking and intimate partner violence. Addiction, 98, 791–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States, 2011. MMWR, 61(No. SS-4), 2–162. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/ mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6104.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chromy, J. R., Eyerman, J., Odom, D., McNeeley, M. E., & Hughes, A. (2005). Association between interviewer experience and substance use prevalence rates in NSDUH. In J. Kennet & J. Gfroerer (Eds.), Evaluating and improving methods used in the national survey on drug use and health (pp. 59–87) ( DHHS Pub. No. SMA 05-4044, Methodology Series M-5). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Retrieved from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/nsduh/methods.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Colón, H. M., Robles, R. R., & Sahai, H. (2001). The validity of drug use responses in a household survey in Puerto Rico: Comparison of survey responses of cocaine and heroin with hair tests. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 1042–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone, E. J. (1997). New developments in biological measures of drug prevalence. In L. Harrison & A. Hughes (Eds.), The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates (pp. 108–129). NIDA Research Monograph 167. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from: http://archives.drugabuse.gov/pdf/monographs/monograph167/ 108-129_Cone.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cottler, L. B., Zipp, J. F., Robins, L. N., & Spitznagel, E. L. (1987). Difficult-to-recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiological survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 125, 3–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, C. D. (2001). Coverage, sample design, and weighting in three federal surveys. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 599–614.
   Google Scholar
• Decorte, T., Mortelmans, D., Tieberghien, J., & De Moor, S. (2009). Drug use: An overview of general population surveys in Europe. Lisbon, Portugal: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Retrieved from: http://www.emcdda. europa.eu/publications/thematic-papers/gps
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, W. W., Anthony, J. C., Tepper S., & Dryman, A. (1992). Psychopathology and attrition in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Surveys. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135, 1051–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fendrich, M., & Johnson, T. P. (2001). Examining prevalence differences in three national surveys of youth: Impact of consent procedures, mode, and editing rules. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 615–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fendrich, M., Johnson, T. P., Hubbell, A., & Spiehler, V. (2004). The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: Results from an ACASI general population survey. Addiction, 99, 197–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, M. L., Bowen, G. S., Varga, L. M., Collazo, J. B., Hernandez, N., Perrino, T., (2005). High rates of club drug use and risky sexual practices among Hispanic men who have sex with men in Miami, Florida. Substance Use & Misuse, 40, 1347–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J., & Stringfellow V. L. (2001). Learning from experience: Estimating teen use of alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana from three survey protocols. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 643–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office. (1993). Drug use measurement: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improvement. ( GAO/PEMD-93-18). Washington, D.C.: GAO. Retrieved from: http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat5/149657.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, L. D. (2001). Understanding the differences in youth drug prevalence rates produced by the MTF, NHSDA, and YRBS studies. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 665–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, L. D., Martin, S. S., Enev, T., & Harrington, D. (2007). Comparing drug testing and self-report of drug use among youths and young adults in the general population. ( DHHS Pub. No SMA 07-4249, Methodology Series M-7). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Retrieved from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/nsduh/drugtest.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, M. L., Pantula, J., & Lessler, J. T. (1992). Effects of decomposition of complex concepts. In C. F. Turner, J. T. Lessler & J. C. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey measurement of drug use: Methodological studies (pp. 245–264). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. B., & Richter, L. (2004). Research note: What if we're wrong? Some possible implications of systematic distortions in adolescents’ self-reports of sensitive behaviors. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 951–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. P., & Bowman, P. J. (2003). Cross-cultural sources of measurement error in substance use surveys. Substance Use & Misuse, 38, 1447–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. P., & Fendrich, M. (2005). Modeling sources of self-report bias in a survey of drug use epidemiology. Annals of Epidemiology, 15, 381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. P., Fendrich, M., Shaligram, C., Garcy, A., & Gillepie, S. (2000). An evaluation of the effects of interviewer characteristics in an RDD telephone survey of drug use. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 77–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. P., Hougland, J., & Clayton, R. (1989). Obtaining reports of sensitive behaviors: A comparison of substance use reports from telephone and face-to-face interviews. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 174–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. P., Parker, V., & Clements, C. (2001). Detection and prevention of data falsification in survey research. Survey Research, 32, 1–2. Retrieved from: http://www.srl.uic. edu/Publist/Newsletter/2001/01v32n3.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. P., & Wright, J. D. (2010). Surveys in applied settings. In P. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research, Second Edition (pp. 461–474). San Diego: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2012). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2011. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. Retrieved from: http://www.monitoringthefuture. org/pubs/monographs/mtf-overview2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, C. D., Korf, D., & Sterk, C. (1987). Temporal and social contexts of heroin-using populations: An illustration of the snowball sampling technique. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 566–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinig, J., & Einstein, S. (2006). Ethical challenges for intervening in drug use: Policy, research and treatment issues. Huntsville, TX: Office of International Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Lahaut, V. M. H. C. J., Jansen, H. A. M., van de Mheen, H., & Garretsen, H. F. L. (2002). Non-response bias in a sample survey on alcohol consumption. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 37, 256–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. K. (2002). Teen Drinking a US Epidemic, Study Says: Under-21s Account for 25% of Alcohol Consumption. San Francisco Chronicle, February 26, A-1.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmens, P. H. H. M., Tan, E. S., & Knibbe, R. A. (1988). Bias due to non-response in a Dutch survey on alcohol consumption. British Journal of Addiction, 83, 1069–1077.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonard, K., Dunn N. J., & Jacob, T. (1983). Drinking problems of alcoholics: Correspondence between self and spouse reports. Addictive Behaviors, 8, 369–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessler, J. T., Caspar, R. A., Penne, M. A., & Barker, P. R. (2000). Developing computer assisted interviewing (CAI) for the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 9–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, W. E., LaBrie, R., Woodworth, R., & Zhang, C. (2002). Estimates of potential bias in telephone substance abuse surveys due to exclusion of households without telephones. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 1139–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Mensch, B. D., & Kandel, D. B. (1988). Underreporting of substance use in a national longitudinal youth cohort: Individual and interviewer effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 100–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. V. (1997). Is “up” right? The national household survey on drug abuse. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 627–641.
   Google Scholar
• Ouelett, L. J., Cagle, H. H., & Fisher, D. G. (1997). “Crack” versus “rock” cocaine: The importance of local nomenclature in drug research and education. Contemporary Drug Problems, 24, 219–237.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, I. (2008). Alcohol and other drug use in South Australia. Parkside, SA, Australia: Drug and Alcohol Services South Australia. Retrieved from: http://www.dassa.sa.gov.au/ webdata/resources/files/2008_Statistical_overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rootman, I., & Smart, R. G. (1985). A comparison of alcohol, tobacco and drug use as determined from household and school surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 16, 89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell, L. C., Agrawal, S., & Sobell, M. B. (1997). Factors affecting agreement between alcohol abusers’ and their collaterals’ reports. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 405–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steeh, C., Kirgis, N., Cannon, B., & DeWitt, J. (2001). Are they really as bad as they seem? Nonresponse rates at the end of the 20th Century. Journal of Official Statistics, 17, 227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2011). Results from the 2010 national survey on drug use and health: Summary of national findings, NSDUH Series H-41, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 11-4658. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Retrieved from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/ NSDUH/2k10NSDUH/2k10Results.htm
   Google Scholar
• Treaster, J. B. (1990). Bush hails drug use decline in a survey some see as flawed. The New York Times, December 20. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/12/20/us/bush-hails-drug-use-decline-in-a-survey-some-see-as-flawed.html? pagewanted=all&src=pm
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2010). Drug use in Afghanistan: 2009 survey, executive summary. Kabul, Afghanistan: UNODC. Retrieved from: http://www.unodc.org/ documents/data-and-analysis/Studies/ Afghan-Drug-Survey-2009-Executive-Summary-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wild, T. C., Cunningham, J., & Adlaf, E. (2001). Nonresponse in a follow-up to a representative telephone survey of adult drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 257–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, P. (1981). Improving the methodology of drinking surveys. The Statistician, 30, 159–167.
   Google Scholar