Two-Sided Messages for Health Risk Prevention: The Role of Argument Type, Refutation, and Issue Ambivalence

REFERENCES

• Abernethy, A. M., & Franke, G. E. (1996). The information content of advertising: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising, 25, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, N., Menon, G., & Aaker, J. L. (2007). Getting emotional about health. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 100–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, H. Y., Wu, L., Kelly, S., & Haley, E. (2011). A qualitative study of college student responses to conflicting messages in advertising: Anti-binge drinking public service announcements versus wine promotion health messages. International Journal of Public Health, 56, 271–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. (1991). Meta-analysis comparing effectiveness of one and two-sided messages. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 390–404.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1421–1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belch, G. E. (1981). An Examination of comparative and noncomparative television commercials: The effects of claim variation and repetition on cognitive response and message acceptance. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 333–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Meredith.
   Google Scholar
• Bolls, P. D., Lang, A., & Potter, R. F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28, 627–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., Cohen, M., Miller, M. D., & Montgomery, C. L. (1978). An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5, 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V., & Thompson, S. C. (1988). The vividness effect: Elusive or illusory? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costley, C. L., & Brucks, M. (1992). Selective recall and information use in consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 464–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, C. (1997). Reasons for drinking versus outcome expectancies in the prediction of college student drinking. Substance Use & Misuse, 32, 1287–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, A. E., & Hoyer, W. D. (1994). An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 561–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, E., Eadie, D., Stead, M., & Evans, K. (2007). Comparative study of young people's response to anti-smoking messages. International Journal of Advertising, 26, 99–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drolet, A., Williams, P., & Lau-Gesk, L. (2007). Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. cognitive ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian products. Marketing Letters, 18, 211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. (2006). Two-sided advertising: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. (2007). Understanding two-sided persuasion: An empirical assessment of theoretical approaches. Psychology and Marketing, 24, 615–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etgar, M., & Goodwin, S. A. (1982). One-sided versus two-sided comparative message appeals for new brand introductions. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 460–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faison, E. W. J. (1961). Effectiveness of one-sided and two-sided mass communication in advertising. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 468–469.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, L. A., & Smith, S. W. (1991). Memorability and persuasiveness of organ donation message strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 34, 695–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, L. L., & Alpert, M. I. (1987). Comparative analysis of the relative effectiveness of one-and two-sided communication for contrasting products. Journal of Advertising, 16, 18–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M., & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahm, H. C., Kolaczyk, E., Jang, J., Swenson, T., & Bhindarwala, A. M. (2012). Binge drinking trajectories from adolescence to young adulthood: The effects of peer social network. Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 745–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, G., Stead, M., & Webb, J. (2004). Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 961–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The role of attitudinal ambivalence in susceptibility to consensus informative. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B. (1981). Integrating compositional and decompositional analyses to represent the intervening role of perceptions in evaluative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of affect as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 404–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I. (1954). Effects of the mass media of communication. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., & Cohen, E. A. (2004). College students’ reasons for not drinking and not playing drinking games. Substance Use & Misuse, 39, 1137–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamins, M. A., & Assael, H. (1987). Two-sided versus one-sided appeals: A cognitive perspective on argumentation, source derogation, and the effect of disconfirming trial on belief change. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntsche, E., Rehm, J., & Gmel, G. (2004). Characteristics of binge drinkers in Europe. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 113–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laczniak, R. N., Muehling, D. D., & Grossbart, S. (1989). Manipulating message involvement in advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 18, 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, P., Witworth, M., Woodward, R., & Yorke, R. (1977). The effect of sidedness and fear arousal on willingness to participate in a slimming scheme. Health Education Journal, 36, 67–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. S., & Stout, P. A. (1987). Effects of message modality and appeal on advertising acceptance. Psychology and Marketing, 4, 167–187.
   Google Scholar
• Maio, G. R., Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (1996). Ambivalence and persuasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 513–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1992). The construction of social judgments. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. (1961). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 326–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. A. (1986). The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attitudes and attitudes towards the advertisement. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechmann, C. (1992). Predicting when two-sided ads will be more effective than one-sided ads: The role of correlational and correspondent inferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 441–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., DeSteno, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2001). The role of affect in attitude change. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 212–233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 144–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 19–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, M. L., & Batra, R. (1983). Emotion and persuasion in advertising: What we do & don't know about affect. In R. P. Bagozzi & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (p. 10). Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., Lang, A., Thorson, E., & Rothschild, M. (1988). Hemispheric lateralization and the processing of affective television scenes. Human Communication Research, 15, 493–508.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., Thorson, E., Rothschild, M., McDonald, D., Hirsch, J., & Goldstein, R. (1985). Attention to television: Intra stimulus effects of movement and scene changes on alpha variation over time. International Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciardelli, L. A., Williams, R. J., & Finemore, J. (2001). Restraint as misregulation in drinking and eating. Addictive Behaviors, 26, 665–675.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riggs, N. R., & Pentz, M. A. (2009). Long-term effects of adolescent marijuana use prevention on adult mental health services utilization: The Midwestern Prevention Project. Substance Use & Misuse, 44, 616–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosselli, F., Skelly, J., & Mackie, D. M. (1995). Processing cognitive and affective messages: The cognitive and affective mediation of persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 168–190.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., & Hunt, S. O. (1978). Attributional processes and effects in promotional situations. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, E.-Y., Smiler, A. P., Wagoner, K. G., & Wolfson, M. (2012). Everyone says it's OK: Adolescents’ perceptions of peer, parent, and community alcohol norms, alcohol consumption, and alcohol-related consequences. Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 86–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., & Clark, D. (1998). Alcohol consumption in university students: The role of reasons for drinking, coping strategies, expectancies, and personality traits. Addictive Behaviors, 23, 371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P., & Drolet, A. (2005). Age-related differences in responses to affective advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 343–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemborain, M., & Gita, V. J. (2007). Attitudinal ambivalence and openness to persuasion: A framework for interpersonal influences. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 506–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, H. C., & Manfredo, M. J. (2000). An experimental test of cognitive and affective appeals about a recreation issue. Leisure Sciences, 22, 183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar