Homeless Drug Users and Information Technology: A Qualitative Study with Potential Implications for Recovery from Drug Dependence

REFERENCES

• ACMD (2013). What recovery outcomes does the evidence tell us we can expect? Second report of the Recovery Committee. London: Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, M. J. (2012). Silk Road: Ebay for drugs. Addiction, 107, 683–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, D., Groshkova, T., McCartney, D., Bamber, S., & Livingston, W. (2009). The politics of hope. Recovery debate. Druglink, Nov/Dec, 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Betty Ford Institute (2007). What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction: The social critique of the judgment of taste. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, R., & Gane, N. (2006). Geodemographics, software and class. Sociology, 40, 793–812.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, K. M., Ball, S. A., Martino, S., Nich, C., Babuscio, T. A., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2009). Enduring effects of a computer-assisted training program for cognitive behavioral therapy: A 6-month follow-up of CBT4CBT. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 100, 178–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion, K. E., Newton, N. C., Barrett, E. L., & Teesson, M. (2013). A systematic review of school-based alcohol and other drug prevention programs facilitated by computers or the Internet. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32, 115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christin, N. (2012). Traveling the Silk Road: A measurement analysis of a large anonymous online marketplace. Working Paper. Retrieved September 8, 2013, from Carnegie Mellon INI/CyLab. Website: http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/nicolasc/publica tions/TR-CMU-CyLab-12–018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (1994). Terminating addiction naturally: Post-addict identity and avoidance of treatment. Clinical Sociological Review, 12, 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2001). Natural recovery from substance dependency: Lessons for treatment providers. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 1, 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2008). Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use and Misuse, 43, 1971–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coumans, M., & Spreen, M. (2003). Drug use and the role of homelessness in the process of marginalization. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 311–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. (2012). Why the methadone doesn't work. Retrieved September 8, 2013, from The Guardian. Website: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jan/10/why-methadone-drugs-dont-work
   Google Scholar
• Duke, K., Herring, R., Thickett, A., & Thom, B. (2013). Substitution treatment in the era of ‘recovery’: An analysis of stakeholder roles and policy windows in Britain. Substance Use and Misuse, 48, 966–976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (1996). The elephant that no one sees: Natural recovery among middle-class addicts. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (1999). Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government (2010). Drug strategy 2010: Reducing demand, restricting supply, building recovery: Supporting people to live a drug free life. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Inter Ministerial Group on Drugs (2012). Putting full recovery first –the recovery roadmap. London: Department of Health, Department of Work and Pensions, Ministry of Justice, Department for Communities and Local Government, HM Treasury, Cabinet Office, Department for Education & Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Longley, P. A., & Singleton, A. D. (2009). Linking social deprivation and digital exclusion in England. Urban Studies, 46, 1275–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J. (2001). Homelessness among problem drug users: A double jeopardy explored. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12, 353–369.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, J. (2008). Homelessness, drug use and hepatitis C: A complex problem explored within the context of social exclusion. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19, 429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Nettleton, S., & Pickering, L. (2011). What is the role of harm reduction when drug users say they want abstinence? International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 189–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Hunt, G., Lankenau, S., Mayock, P., Miller, P., Sheridan, J., … Treloar, C. (2013). Addiction journal is committed to publishing qualitative research. Addiction, 108, 447–449.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2000). Learning to bridge the digital divide. OECD: Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, L. (2000). New communications technologies: A conduit for social exclusion. Information, Communication and Society, 3, 39–68.
   Google Scholar
• Pleace, N. (2008). Effective services for substance misuse and homelessness in Scotland: Evidence from an international review. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riper, H., Kramer, J., Smit, F., Conijn, B., Schippers, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2008). Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: A pragmatic randomized trial. Addiction, 103, 218–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J., & Spencer L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• SAMHSA (2011). SAMHSA's definition and guiding principles of recovery –answering the call for feedback. Retrieved September 8, 2013, from SAMHSA. Website: http://blog.samhsa.gov/ 2011/12/22/samhsa%E2%80%99s-definition-and-guiding-prin ciples-of-recovery-%E2%80%93-answering-the-call-for-feed back
   Google Scholar
• Schaub, M., Sullivan, R., Haug, S., & Stark, L. (2012). Web-based cognitive behavioral self-help intervention to reduce cocaine consumption in problematic cocaine users: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, e166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2008). The road to recovery: A new approach to tackling Scotland's drug problem. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. JOAAG, 4, 72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Thom, B. (2010). Women in recovery. In R. Yates & M. S. Malloch (Eds.), Tackling addiction. pathways to recovery. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group (2008). The UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group. A vision of recovery. Retrieved September 8, 2013, from UKDPC Drug Policy Commission. Website: http://www.ukdpc.org. uk/resources/A%20Vision%20of%20Recovery.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Hout, M. C., & Bingham, T. (2013). ‘Silk Road’, the virtual drug marketplace: A single case study of user experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24, 385–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar