532
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PART ONE

Drug Sales, Gender, and Risk: Notions of Risk From the Perspective of Gang-Involved Young Adults

, &

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, T. (Ed.) (2008). Neither villain nor victim: Empowerment and agency among women substance abusers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Anderson, T. L. (2005). Dimensions of women's power in the illicit drug economy. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 371–400.
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
  • Beck, U. (1994). Ecological politics in an age of risk. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163.
  • Bjerregaard, B. (2010). Gang membership and drug involvement: Untangling the complex relationship. Crime & Delinquency, 56(3), 3–34.
  • Bourgois, P. (1995). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 47–60.
  • Caulkins, J. P., & Reuter, P. (1998). What price data tell us about drug markets. Journal of Drug Issues, 28(3), 593–612.
  • Chan, W., & Rigakos, G. S. (2002). Risk, crime, and gender. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 743–761.
  • Coomber, R., & Maher, L. (2006). Street-level drug market activity in Sydney's primary heroin markets: Organisation, adulteration practices, pricing, marketing, and violence. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(3), 719–753.
  • Cross, J. C. (2000). Passing the buck: Risk avoidance and risk management in the illegal/informal drug trade. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20(9/10), 68–94.
  • Denton, B., & O'Malley, P. (1999). Gender, trust and business: Women drug dealers in the illicit economy. British Journal of Criminology, 39(4), 513–530.
  • Douglas, M. (1985). Risk: Acceptability according to the social sciences. London: Routledge.
  • Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Dunlap, E., Johnson, B. D., & Manwar, A. (1994). A successful female crack dealer: Case study of a deviant career. Deviant Behavior, 15, 1–25.
  • Ewald, F. (1991). Insurance and risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 197–210). London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
  • Fagan, J. (1994). Girls, gangs, women and drugs. Contemporary Sociology, 23(2), 299–300.
  • Fitzgerald, J. L. (2009). Mapping the experiences of drug dealing risk environments: An ethnographic case study. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20(3), 261–269.
  • France, A. (2008). Risk factor analysis and the youth question. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(1), 1–15.
  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Griffin, M., & Rodriguez, N. (2011). The gendered nature of drug acquisition behavior within marijuana and crack drug markets. Crime & Delinquency, 57(3), 408–431.
  • Hannah-Moffat, K., & O'Malley, P. (Eds.). (2007). Gendered risks: An introduction. In K. Hannah-Moffat & P. O'Malley (Eds.), Gendered risks (pp. 1–29). New York: Routledge-Cavendish.
  • Hayward, K. (2002). The vilification and pleasures of youthful transgression. In J. Muncie, G. Hughes, & E. McLaughlin (Eds.), Youth justice: Critical readings (pp. 80–93). London: Sage.
  • Hutton, F. (2005). Risky business: Gender, drug dealing, and risk. Addiction Research and Theory, 13(6), 545–554.
  • Jacobs, B. A. (1996). Crack dealers’ apprehension avoidance techniques: A case of restrictive deterrence. Justice Quarterly, 13(3), 359–381.
  • Jacobs, B. A. (1999). Dealing crack: The social world of streetcorner selling. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
  • Jacobs, B. A., & Miller, J. (1998). Crack dealing, gender, and arrest avoidance. Social Problems, 45(4), 550–569.
  • Joe-Laidler, K., & Hunt, G. (2001). Accomplishing femininity among girls in the gang. British Journal of Criminology, 41(4), 656–678.
  • Johnson, B., Hamid, A., & Sanabria, H. (1992). Emerging modesl of crack distribution. In T. Mieczkowski (Ed.), Drugs, crime, and social policy: Research, issues, and concerns (pp. 56–78). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Johnson, B. D., & Natarajan, M. (1995). Strategies to avoid arrest: Crack sellers’ response to intensified policing. American Journal of Police, 14(3/4), 49–69.
  • Lauderback, D., Hansen, J., & Waldorf, D. (1992). Sisters are doin’ it for themselves: A Black female gang in San Francisco. The Gang Journal, 1(1), 57–72.
  • Lupton, D. (1999). Introduction: Risk and sociocultural theory. In: D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lupton, D., & Tulloch, J. (2002). Life would be pretty dull without risk: Voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, Risk & Society, 4(2), 113–124.
  • Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework: A social psychological analysis of voluntary risk taking. American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 851–886.
  • Lyng, S. (2005). Edgework and the risk-taking experience. In S. Lyng (Ed.), Edgework: The sociology of risk-taking (pp. 3–14). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lyng, S., & Mathews, R. (2007). Risk, edgework, and masculinities. In K. Hannah-Moffat & P. O'Malley (Eds.), Gendered risks (pp. 75–97). New York: Routledge-Cavendish.
  • Maher, L. (1997). Sexed work: Gender, race, and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Maher, L., & Hudson, S. L. (2007). Women in the drug economy: A metasynthesis of the qualitative literature. Journal of Drug Issues, 37(4), 805–826.
  • Messerschmidt, J. W. (1997). Crime as structured action: Gender, race, class, and crime in the making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miller, E., (1991). Assessing the risk of inattention to class, race/ethnicity, and gender: Comment on lying. American Journal of Sociology, 96(6), 1530–1534.
  • Miller, J. (2001). One of the guys: Girls, gangs, and gender. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Miller, M. (2010). The tyranny of dead ideas. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
  • Miller, J., & Brunson, R. K. (2000). Gender dynamics in youth gangs: A comparison of males’ and females’ accounts. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 419–448.
  • Miller, J., & Decker, S. H. (2001). Young women and gang violence: Gender, street offending, and violent victimization in gangs. Justice Quarterly, 18(1), 115–140.
  • Miller, M., & Neaigus, A. (2002). An economy of risk: Resource acquisition strategies of inner city women who use drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13, 409–418.
  • Moore, J. W., & Hagedorn, J. M. (1999). What happens to girls in the gang? In M. Chesney-Lind & J. M. Hagedorn (Eds.), Female gangs in America (pp. 177–186). Chicago, IL: Lake View Press.
  • Moore, J. W., & Hagedorn, J. W. (2001). Female gangs: A focus on research (pp. 1–11). Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice.
  • Moore, J. W., & Mata, A. (1981). Women and heroin in Chicano communities. Los Angeles, CA: Chicano Pint Research Project.
  • Morgan, P., & Joe, K. A. (1997). Uncharted terrain: Contexts of experience among women in the illicit drug economy. Women & Criminal Justice, 8(3), 85–109.
  • Murphy, S., & Arroyo, K. (2000). Women as judicious consumers of drug markets. In M. Natarajan & M. Hough (Eds.), Illegal drug markets: From research to prevention policy (pp. 101–120). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
  • O'Malley, P. (2004). Risk, uncertainty and government. London: The GlassHouse Press.
  • O'Malley, P., & Mugford, S. (1993). Crime, excitement, and modernity. In G. Barak (Ed.), Varieties of criminology: Readings from a dynamic discipline (pp. 189–211). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Petersen, A., & Wilkinson, I. (2008). Health, risk and vulnerability: An introduction. In A. Petersen & I. Wilkinson (Eds.), Health, risk and vulnerability (pp. 1–15). London: Routledge.
  • Rayner, S. (1992). Cultural theory and risk analysis. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 83–115). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Rhodes, T. (1997). Risk theory in epidemic times: Sex, drugs and the social organisation of “risk behavior.” Sociology of Health & Illness, 19(2), 208–227.
  • Rhodes, T. (2005). The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Social Science & Medicine, 61(5): 1026–1044.
  • Rhodes, T. (2009). Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approach. Interntional Journal of Drug Policy, 20(3), 193–201.
  • Rose, N., O'Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.
  • Sandberg, S. (2008). Street capital: Ethnicity and violence on the streets of Oslo. Theoretical Criminology, 12(2), 153–171.
  • Sanders, T. (2004). A continuum of risk? The management of health, physical, and emotional risks by female sex workers. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(5), 557–574.
  • Small, W., Maher, L., Lawlord, J., Wood, E., Shannon, K., Kerr, T. (2013). Injection drug users’ involvement in drug dealing in the downtown eastside of Vancouver: Social organization and systemic violence. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24(5), 479–487.
  • Sommers, I., Baskin, D., & Fagan, J. (2000). Workin’ hard for the money: The social and economic lives of women drug sellers. New York, NY: Nova Science.
  • Van Loon, J. (2008). Governmentality and the subpolitics of teenage sexual risk behavior. In A. Petersen & I. Wilkinson (Eds.), Health, risk and vulnerability (pp. 48–65). London: Routledge.
  • Waldorf, D. (1993). Don't be your own best customer: Drug use of San Francisco gang drug sellers. Crime, Law and Social Change, 19(1), 1–15.
  • Worden, R. E., Bynum, T. S., & Frank, J. (1994). Police crackdowns on drug abuse and trafficking. In D. L. MacKenzie & C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 95–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.