The Decoy Effect Within Alcohol Purchasing Decisions

References

• Acker, J., & MacKillop, J. (2013). Behavioral economic analysis of cue-elicited craving for tobacco: A virtual reality study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15, 1409–1416.
   Google Scholar
• Amlung, M. T., Acker, J., Stojek, M. K., Murphy, J. G., & MacKillop, J. (2012). Is talk “cheap”? An initial investigation of the equivalence of alcohol purchase task performance for hypothetical and actual rewards. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(4), 716–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., & Zakay, D. (2001). A timely account of the role of duration in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 108(2), 187–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). Audit.The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A., & Husk, K. (2012). Controlling pre-loaders: Alcohol related violence in an English night time economy. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 12, 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, J. (2014). Alcohol minimum unit pricing and socioeconomic status. The Lancet, 383(9929), 1616–1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, J., Fisher, D., Kozup, J. C., Smith, S., Burton, S., & Creyer, E. H. (2001). The effects of bar-sponsored alcohol beverage promotions across binge and nonbinge drinkers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20, 240–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, J. P., Longabaugh, R., & Miller, W. R. (1996). Looking forward and back to relapse: Implications for research and practice. Addiction, 91, 191–196.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. B., & Best, D. W. (1996). Demand characteristics and research into drug use. Psychology & Health, 11, 291–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (1999). The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 369–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, S., Rogers, R. D., & Duka, T. (2005). The acute effect of alcohol on decision making in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology, 182, 160–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, T. B., & Chatterjee, S. (1995). Asymmetric decoy effects on lower-quality versus higher-quality brands: Meta-analytic and experimental evidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 268–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgcock, W., & Rao, A. R. (2009). Trade-off aversion as an explanation for the attraction effect: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herne, K. (1999). The effects of decoy gambles on individual choice. Experimental Economics, 2(1), 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., Meng, Y., Meier, P. S., Brennan, A., Angus, C., Campbell-Burton, A., & Purshouse, R. C. (2014). Effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on different income and socioeconomic groups: A modelling study. The Lancet, 383(9929), 1655–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer, W. D. (1984). An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 822—829.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Zhang, Y. C. (2015). The out-of-stock (OOS) effect on choice shares of available options. Journal of Retailing, 92, 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., Quigg, Z., Bellis, M. A., Calafat, A., Hasselt, N. V., Kosir, M., & Juan, M. (2012). Drunk and disorganised: relationships between bar characteristics and customer intoxication in European drinking environments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(11), 4068–4082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, J. J., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 116–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josiam, B. M., & Hobson, J. P. (1995). Consumer choice in context: The decoy effect in travel and tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 34(1), 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Karam, E., Kypri, K., & Salamoun, M. (2007). Alcohol use among college students: An international perspective. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20, 213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katikireddi, S. V., & McLean, J. A. (2012). Introducing a minimum unit price for alcohol in Scotland: Considerations under European Law and the implications for European public health. The European Journal of Public Health, 22(4), 457–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, K. J., Chen, S. A., Kitamura, O., Markou, A., & Koob, G. F. (2006). Withdrawal drives heroin consumption and decreases reward sensitivity. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 5894–5900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Park, J., & Ryu, G. (2006). Decoy effects and brands. Advances in Consumer Research, 33(1), 683–687.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. R., Wechsler, H., Kuo, M., Seibring, M., Weitzman, E. R., & Schuckit, M. A. (2002). Alcohol abuse and dependence among U.S. college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 263–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krank, M., Wall, A. M., Stewart, S. H., Wiers, R. W., & Goldman, M. S. (2005). Context effects on alcohol cognitions. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(2), 196–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lê, A. D., Poulos, C. X., & Cappell, H. (1979). Conditioned tolerance to the hypothermic effect of ethyl alcohol. Science, 206, 1109–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, B. (1996). Politics or science? The question of gender sameness/difference. American Psychologist, 51, 155–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, M. F. (1998). Choosing to avoid: coping with negatively emotion—Laden consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 409–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKillop, J., Brown, C. L., Stojek, M. K., Murphy, C. M., Sweet, L., & Niaura, R. S. (2012). Behavioral economic analysis of withdrawal-and cue-elicited craving for tobacco: an initial investigation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14, 1426–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk, R. L., & Heim, D. (2013a). Environmental context effects on alcohol-related outcome expectancies, efficacy and norms: A field study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 814–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk, R. L., & Heim, D. (2013b). Panoramic projection: Affording a wider view on contextual influences on alcohol-related cognitions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(1), 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk, R. L., & Heim, D. (2014). A real-time examination of context effects on alcohol cognitions. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 38, 2452–2459.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, R. L., Heim, D., Qureshi, A., & Price, A. (2015). “I have no clue what I drunk last night”: Using smartphone technology to compare in-vivo and retrospective self-reports of alcohol consumption. PLoS ONE, 10, e0126209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H., Schliwa, V., & Lehmann, S. (2014). Prize decoys at work—New experimental evidence for asymmetric dominance effects in choices on prizes in competitions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(4), 457–460.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, M. A., & Plant, M. (2006). Binge Britain: Alcohol and the national response. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, B. M. C., Siegel, S., & Bueno, J. L. O. (2002). Occasion setting and drug tolerance. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 37, 165–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Record, C., & Day, C. (2009). Britain's alcohol market: How minimum alcohol prices could stop moderate drinkers subsidising those drinking at hazardous and harmful levels. Clinical Medicine, 9(5), 421–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, P., & Drummond, C. (2012). The price of a drink: The potential of alcohol minimum unit pricing as a public health measure in the UK. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 201(3), 169–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpi, D. (2008). The impact of decoys and background information on consumers' preferences and decision making. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Scarpi, D., & Pizzi, G. (2013). The impact of phantom decoys on choices and perceptions. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 26, 451–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senchak, M., Leonard, K. E., & Greene, B. W. (1998). Alcohol use among college students as a function of their typical social drinking context. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 12, 62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimanoff, S. B. (1984). Commonly named emotions in everyday conversations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. (1984). Pavlovian conditioning and heroin overdose. Reports by overdose victims. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 428–230.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. (2001). Pavlovian conditioning and drug overdose: When tolerance fails. Addiction Research & Theory, 9, 503–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S., & Ellsworth, D. W. (1986). Pavlovian conditioning and death from apparent overdose of medically prescribed morphine: A case report. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 278–280.
   Google Scholar
• Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. The American Psychologist, 45, 921–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, R., & Bacon, S. (1953). Drinking in college. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svenson, O., & Maule, A. J. (1993). Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turley, L. W., & Chebat, J. C. (2002). Linking retail strategy, atmospheric design and shopping behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(1–2), 125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3(6), 358–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, A. M., Mckee, S. A., & Hinson, R. E. (2000). Assessing variation in alcohol outcome expectancies across environmental context: An examination of the situational-specificity hypothesis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedell, D. H., & Pettibone, J. C. (1996). Using judgments to understand decoy effects in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 326–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar