References
- Bowker L. H. The incidence of drug use and associated factors in two small towns: A community survey. Bull. Narc. 1976; 28: 17–25
- Box G. E.P., Jenkins G. M. Time Scries Analysis Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA 1970
- Box G. E.P., Tiao G. C. A change in level of a nonstationary time series. Biometrika 1965; 52: 181–192
- Box G. E.P., Tiao G. C. Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1975; 25: 70–92
- Carman R. S. Internal-external control and drug use among junior high school students in a rural community. Int. J. Addict. 1977; 12: 53–64
- Champion R. A., Bell D. S. Monitoring trends in drug use. Int. J. Addict. 1980; 15: 375–391
- Cockerham W. C. Patterns of alcohol and multiple drug use among rural White and American Indian adolescents. Int. J. Addict. 1977; 12(2–3)271–285
- Cockerham W. C, Forslund M. A., Raboin R. M. Drug use among White and American Indian high school youth. Int. J. Addict. 1976; 11: 209–220
- Ferraro D. P., Billings D. K. Marijuana use by college students: Three-year trends, 1970–1972. Int. J. Addict. 1974; 9: 321–327
- Fischler M. L. Drug use in rural, small town New England. J. Alt. State Consciousness 1975–1976; 2(2)171–183
- Forslund M. A. Drug use and delinquent behavior of small towns and rural youth. J. DrugEduc. 1977–1978; 7(3)219–224
- Garfield M. D., Garfield E. G. A longitudinal study of drugs on a campus. Int. J. Addict. 1973; 8: 599–611
- Ginsberg I. J., Greenley J. R. Competing theories of marijuana use: A longitudinal study. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1978; 19: 22–34
- Globetti G., Brigance R. S. The use and nonuse of drugs among high school students in a small rural community. J. Drug Educ. 1971; 1(4)317–322
- Heiligman A. C. A survey of drug use in u rural Minnesota senior high school. Drug Forum 1973; 2(2)173–177
- Irgens-Jensen O., Rud M. G. Changes in the use of drugs tobacco, and alcohol among Norwegian youth from 1966–1979. J. Drug Issues 1980; 9: 405–420
- Krakowiak P. A., Cross H. J. A social learning approach to student marijuana use. Int. J. Addict. 1979; 14: 789–796
- Lawrence T. S., Velleman J. D. Correlates of student drug use in a suburban high school. Psychiatry 1974; 37: 139–146
- Mc Coy C. B., Watkins V. M. Drug use among urban ethnic youth: Appalachian and other comparisons. Youth and Society 1980; 12: 83–106
- Napier T. L., Carter T. J., Pratt M. C. Correlates of alcohol and marijuana use among rural high school students. Rural Soc. 1981; 46: 319–332
- Padilla E. R., Padilla A. M., Morales A., Almedo E. L. Inhalant, marijuana, and alcohol abuse among barrio children and adolescents. Int. J. Addict. 1979; 14: 945–964
- SOCIAL RESEARCH GROUP OF GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and RESPONSE ANALYSIS CORPORATION. Drugs in Rural America. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1981, Treatment Research Notes. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drue Abuse, and Mental Health Administration
- Stores J. P. Drug use among undergraduate psychology students at an urban university. Drug Forum 1974; 3: 355–362
- Tec N. Differential involvement with marijuana and its sociocultural context: A study of suburban youths. Int. J. Addict. 1972; 7: 655–669
- Tolone W. J., Dermott D. Some correlates of drug use among high school youth in a midwestern rural community. Int. J. Addict. 1975; 10: 761–777
- Weinstein M. Changes in drug usage and associated personality traits among college students. Int. J. Addict. 1978; 13: 683–688
- Winfree L. T., Tiieis H. E., Griffiths C. T. Drug use in rural America: A cross-cultural examination of complementary social deviance theories. Youth and Society 1981; 12: 465–489
- Wister A. V., Avison W. R. “Friendly persuasion”: A social network analysis of sex differences in marijuana use. Int. J. Addict. 1982; 17: 523–541
- Zingraff M. T., Belyea M. J. Drug arrest statistics: A proposal for their use. Int. J. Addict. 1983; 18: 465–478
- Zingraff M. T., Suval E. M. Patterns of rural-urban arrests. J. Soc. Bchav. Sci. 1983; 29(3)70–76