Choosing Drug Use Measures for Treatment Outcome Studies. II. Timing Baseline and Follow-up Measurement

References

• Bale R. N. Outcome research in therapeutic communities for drug abusers: A critical review. Int. J. Addict. 1979; 14: 1053–1074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale R. N., Van Stone W. W., Kuldau J. M., Engelsing T. M.J., Elasoff R. M., Zarcone V. P. Therapeutic communities vs. methadone maintenance: A prospective controlled study of narcotic addiction treatment: Design and one-year follow-up. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1980; 37: 179–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt M. R., Brown B. S., Dupont Rl. Follow-up of former clients of a large multimodaHty drug treatment program. Int. J. Addict. 1980; 15: 391–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano R. F., Hawkins J. D. Project skills: Preliminary results from a theoretically based aftercare experiment. Progress in the Development of Cost Effective Treatment for Drug Abusers, R. S. Ashery. National Institute on Drug Abuse, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1985
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M., Howard A., Klein D., Newfield K. Evaluating outcome criteria used in methadone maintenance programs. Int. J. Addict. 1976; 11: 283–294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock S. G., Hubbard R. L., Bray R. M., Cavanaugh E. R., Rachal J. V. Treatment Outcome Prospective Study. Summary and Implications: Client Characteristics, Behavior and Intreatment Outcomes 1980. TOPS Admission Cohort. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 1982
   Google Scholar
• Deleon G., Wexler H. K., Jainchill N. The therapeutic community: Success and improvement rates five years after treatment. Int. J. Addict. 1982; 17: 703–747
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland S. Evaluating community-based treatment programs: A model for strengthening inferences about effectiveness. Int. J. Therapeutic Communities 1983; 4: 285–306
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. J., Rachal J. V., Craddock S. G., Cavanaugh E. R. Treatment outcome prospective study (TOPS): Client characteristics and behaviors before, during, and after treatment. Drug Abuse Treatment Evaluation: Strategies, Progress, and Prospects, F. M. Tims, J J. Ludford. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1984, NIDA Research Monograph 51, A RAUS review report.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt W. A., Bespalec D. A. Relapse rates after treatment for heroin addiction. J. Comm. Psychol. 1974; 2: 85–87
   Google Scholar
• Hunt W. A., Barnett L. W., Branch L. G. Relapse rates in addiction programs. J. Clin. Psychol. 1971; 27: 455–456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Auliffe W. E. Preliminary results of the Harvard Aftercare Experiment. 1981, Presentation to NIDA
   Google Scholar
• Mc Caslin F. C., Ershoff D. H. A critique of project evaluations. Int. J. Addict. 1978; 13: 1263–1284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nathan P. E., Lansky D. Common methodological problems in research on addictions. J Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1978; 46: 713–726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogborne A. C. Controlled evaluative studies of treatment for alcohol and drug abuse. Evaluation of Treatment of Drug Abuse, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia 1980; 62: 66–76, Suppl. 284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed T. Outcome research on treatment and on the drug abuser: An exploration. Int. J. Addict. 1978; 13: 149–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed T. Some organizing concepts and forces that have shaped drug abuse treatment evaluation. Evaluation of Treatment of Drug Abuse, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia 1980; 62: 58–65, Suppl. 284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sells S. B., Demaree R. G., Simpson D. D., Joe G. W., Gorsuch R. L. Issues in the evaluation of drug abuse treatment. Professional Psychol. 1977; 8: 609–640
   Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D. Treatment for drug abuse: Follownip outcomes and length of time spent. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1981; 38: 875–880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Joe G. W., Bracy S. A. Six-year follow-up of opioid addicts after admission to treatment. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1982; 39: 1318–1323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Joe G. W., Lehman W. E.K. Addiction Careers: Summary of Studies Based on the DARP 12-Year Followup. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1986, NIDA Treatment Research Report, DHHS Publ. No. (ADM) 86–1420.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Lloyd M. R. Alcohol and illicit drug use: Follow-up study of treatment admissions to DARP during 1969–1971. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 1978; 5: 1–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Sells S. B. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program. Adv. Alcohol Subs. Abuse 1982; 2: 7–29
   Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Sells S. B. Highlights of the DARP Followup Research on the Evaluation of Drug Abuse Treatment Effectiveness. Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TC 1981, Report 81–3, Institute of Behavioral Research.
   Google Scholar
• Smart R. G. Outcome studies of therapeutic community and halfway house treatment for addicts. Int. J. Addict. 1976; 11: 143–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell L. C., Sobell M. B., Maisto S. A., Fain W. Alcohol and drug use by alcohol and drug abusers when incarcerated: Clinical and research implications. Addict. Behav. 1983; 8: 89–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walizer D. G. The need for standardized scientific criteria for describing drug-using behavior. Int. J. Addict. 1975; 10: 927–936
   PubMedGoogle Scholar