The Law, Social Control, and Drug Policy: Models, Factors, and Processes

References

• Addiction Research Foundation. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto 1987–1988, Annual Report.
   Google Scholar
• Akers R. L. Addiction: The troublesome concept. J. Drug Issues 1991; 21(4)777–792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen F. A. The Borderland of Criminal Justice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1964
   Google Scholar
• Andenaes J. General prevention revisited: Research and policy implications. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 1975; 66(3)338–365
   Google Scholar
• Anglin D. M., Speckart G. Narcotics use and crime: A multisample, multimethod analysis. Criminology 1988; 26(2)197–233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman J. G., Johnston L. D., O'Malley P. M., Humphrey R. H. Explaining the recent decline in marijuana use: Differentiating the effects of perceived risks, disapproval, and general lifestyle factors. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1988; 29(March)92–112
   Google Scholar
• Beaglehole R. Science, advocacy and health policy: Lessons from the New Zealand tobacco wars. J. Public Health Policy 1991; 12(2)175–183
   Google Scholar
• Black D. The Behavior of Law. Academic Press, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Black D. Sociological Justice. Oxford University Press, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell J. Drifting, controlling and overcoming: Opiate users who avoid becoming chronically dependent. J. Drug Issues 1983; 13(2)159–162
   Google Scholar
• Brecher E. M. Licit and Illicit Drugs. Consumers Union, Mount Vernon, New York 1972, and the Editors ofConsumer Reports
   Google Scholar
• Chein I., Gerrard D. L., Lee R. S., Rosenfeld E. The Road to H: Narcotics, Delinquency and Social Policy. Basic Books, New York 1964
   Google Scholar
• Clayton R. Cocaine use in the U.S.: In a blizzard or just being snowed?. Cocaine Use in America: Epidemiologic and Clinical Perspectives, N. J. Kozel, E. H. Adams. NIDA, Rockville, Maryland 1985; 8–34, NIDA Research Monograph 61
   Google Scholar
• Cook P. An introduction to vice. Law Contemp. Probl. 1988; 51(1)1–8
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim E. The Rules of Sociological Method, S. Solovay, J. Mueller, G. Catlin. Free Press, New York 1895; 1938
   Google Scholar
• Duster T. The Legislation of Morality. Macmillan, New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• Erickson P. G. Deterrence and deviance: The example of cannabis prohibition. J. Crim. Law Criminal. 1976; 67(June)222–232
   Google Scholar
• Erickson P. G. Cannabis Criminals: The Social Effects of Punishment on Drug Users. Addiction Research Foundation Books, Toronto 1980
   Google Scholar
• Erickson P. G. The Law in Addictions: Principles, Practicalities and Prospects. Lecture presented at the 40th Anniversary Scientific Lecture Series. Addiction Research Foundation. November 8, 1989a; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Erickson P. G. Living with prohibition: Regular cannabis users, legal sanctions and informal controls. Int. J. Addict. 1989b; 24(3)175–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson P. G. A public health approach to demand reduction. J. Drug Issues 1990; 20(4)563–575
   Google Scholar
• Geis G. Not the Law's Business. National Institute of Mental Health, Center for Studies in Crime and Delinquency, Rockville, Maryland 1979
   Google Scholar
• Giffen P. J. The criminal courts and the control of addictions. Courts and Trials, A Multidisciplinary Approach, M. Friedland. University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1976
   Google Scholar
• Giffen P. J., Endicott S., Lambert S. Panic and Indifference: The Politics of Canada's Drug Laws. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, Ottawa 1991
   Google Scholar
• Glaser D. Interlocking dualities in drug use, drug control and crime. Drugs and the Criminal Justice System, J. A. Inciardi, C. D. Chambers. Sage, Beverly Hills, California 1974; Vol. II: 39–56
   Google Scholar
• Glaser D. Crime in Our Changing Society. Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein P. J., Brownstein H. H., Ryan P. J., Bulluci P. A. Crack and homicide in New York City, 1988: A conceptually based event analysis. Contemp. Drug Probl. 1989; 15(4)651–688
   Google Scholar
• Goode E. The Marijuana Smokers. Basic Books, New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• Hagan J. The Disreputable Pleasures: Crime and Deviance in Canada. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto 1977
   Google Scholar
• Heath D. B. U.S. drug control policy: A cultural perspective. Daedalus 1992; 121: 269–291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelstein J. The continuing career of marijuana: Backlash… within limits. Contemp. Drug Probl. 1986; 13(1)1–21
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe J. H. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics4th ed, L. Goodman, A. Gilman. Macmillan, New York 1970; 286
   Google Scholar
• Jansen A. C. M. Cannabis in Amsterdam: A Geography of Hashish and Marihuana. Coutinho, Muiderberg 1991
   Google Scholar
• Johnson W. T., Peterson R. E., Wells L. E. Arrest probabilities for marijuana users as indicators of selective law enforcement. Am. J. Sociol. 1977; 83: 681–699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadish S. H. The crisis of overcriminalization. Ann. Am. Acad. Soc. Polit. Sci. 1967; 374: 157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan J. Taking drugs seriously. Public Interest 1988; 92(Summer)32–50
   Google Scholar
• King R. “The American system”: Legal sanctions to repress drug abuse. Drugs and the Criminal Justics System, J. A. Inciardi, C. D. Chambers. Sage, Beverly Hills, California 1974; 17–37
   Google Scholar
• Kolb L. Drug Addiction, A Medical Problem. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois 1962
   Google Scholar
• Le Dain Commission, Commission of Inquiry into the Non-medical Use of Drugs. Cannabis. Information Canada, Ottawa 1972
   Google Scholar
• Le Dain Commission. Commission of Inquiry into the Non-medical Use of Drugs. Information Canada, Ottawa 1973, Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Lindesmith A. The Addict and the Law. Indiana University Press, Bloomington 1965
   Google Scholar
• Lundman R. J. One-wave perceptual deterrence literature: Some grounds for the renewed examination of cross-sectional methods. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 1986; 23(4)370–388
   Google Scholar
• Meier R. F., Johnson W. T. Deterrence as social control: The legal and extra-legal production of conformity. Am. Social. Rev. 1977; 42(April)292–304
   Google Scholar
• Moher W. Letter to the Editor. Vie Journal. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto June 1, 1989; 6
   Google Scholar
• Morris N., Hawkins G. The Honest Politician's Guide to Crime Control. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1970
   Google Scholar
• Mosher J. F., Yanagisako K. L. Public health not social welfare: A public health approach to illicit drug policy. J. Public Health Policy 1991; 12(3)278–323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musto D. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut 1973
   Google Scholar
• Nadelmann E. Drug prohibition in the U.S.: Costs, consequences and alternatives. Science 1989; 245: 939–947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hare P. A., Newcombe R., Matthews A., Buning E. C., Drucker E. The Reduction of Drug-Related Harm. Routledge, London 1992
   Google Scholar
• Packer H. L. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California 1968
   Google Scholar
• Petersen D. M. Some reflections on compulsory treatment of addiction. Drugs and the Criminal Justice System, J. A. Inciardi, C. D. Chambers. Sage, Beverly Hills, California 1974; 143–169
   Google Scholar
• Plant M. A. Drug Takers in an English Town. Tavistock, London 1975
   Google Scholar
• Reuter P., Kleiman M. Risks and prices: An economic analysis of drug enforcement. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, M. Tonry, N. Morris. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1986; Vol. 7: 289–340
   Google Scholar
• Shafer Commission [National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse]. Marijuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1972
   Google Scholar
• Silberman M. Toward a theory of criminal deterrence. Am. Social. Rev. 1976; 41(June)442–461
   Google Scholar
• Single E. The impact of marijuana decriminalization: An update. J. Public Health Policy 1989; 10(4)456–466
   Google Scholar
• Single E., Geisbrecht N., Eakins B. The alcohol policy debate in Ontario in the postwar era. Alcohol, Society and the State, E. Single, P. Morgan, J. De Lint. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto 1981; Vol. 2: 127–158
   Google Scholar
• Skolnick J. H. The social transformation of vice. Law Contemp. Probl. 1988; 51(1)9–30
   Google Scholar
• Snyder S. Brainstorming: The Science and Politics of Opiate Research. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1989
   Google Scholar
• Solomon R., Single E., Erickson P. Legal considerations in Canadian cannabis policy. Can. Public Policy 1983; 9(4)419–433
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson G. H., Lingley L. P., Trasov G. E., Stanfield H. Drug Addiction in British Columbia. University of British Columbia. 1956, Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Drugs and Crime, M. Tonry, J. Q. Wilson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1990
   Google Scholar
• Wagstaff A., Maynard A. Economic Aspects of the Illicit Drug Market and Drug Enforcement Policies in the United Kingdom (Home Office Research Unit Study, No. 95). HMSO, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Waldo G. P., Chiricos T. G. Perceived penal sanctions and self-reported criminality: A neglected approach to deterrence research. Soc. Probl. 1972; 19(Spring)522–540
   Google Scholar
• Wisotsky S. Breaking the Impasse in the War on Drugs. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut 1986
   Google Scholar
• Zimring F. E., Hawkins G. Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1973
   Google Scholar