Who Drops Out of Drug-User Treatment Research on Women?

References

• Bale R. N., Arnoldussen B. H., Quittner A. M. Follow-up difficulty with substance abusers: Predictors of time to locate and relationship to outcome. Int. J. Addict. 1984; 19: 885–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale R. N., Cabrera S., Brown J. Follow-up evaluation of drug abuse treatment. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 1977; 4: 233–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandstra E. Discussion: Subject selection, recruitment, and retention in longitudinal studies involving perinatal substance abuse and human immunodeficiency virus infection. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Methodological Issues in Epidemiological, Prevention, and Treatment Research on Drug-Exposed Women and Their Children. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1992, [DHHS Publication (ADM)92–1881]
   Google Scholar
• Beck A. T., Steer R. A., Garbin M. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 1988a; 8: 77–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck A. T., Ward C. H., Medelson M., Mock J., Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1988b; 4: 561–571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan A., Hood D., Brozovsky P., Ochs L., Ary D., Black C. Subject attrition in prevention research. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodological Issues. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1991, [DHHS Publication (ADM)91–1761].
   Google Scholar
• Cook T. D., Campbell D. T. Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago, IL 1979; 341–386
   Google Scholar
• Cooney T. M., Schaie K. W., Willis S. L. The relationship between prior functioning on cognitive and personality dimensions and subject attrition in longitudinal research. J. Gerontol. 1988; 43: 12–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craig R. J. Locating drug addicts who have dropped out of treatment. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 1979; 30: 402–404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Derogatis L. R., Cleary P. A. Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90R: A study in construct validation. J. Clin. Psychol. 1977; 33: 981–989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis L. R., Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychol. Med. 1983; 13: 595–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis L. R., Spencer P. M. The Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual. Clinical Psychometric Research, Baltimore, MD 1982; Vol. 1
   Google Scholar
• Desland M., Batey R. High retention rates within a prospective study of heroin users. Br. J. Addict. 1991; 86: 859–865
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desmond D., Maddux J. F., Johnson T. H., Confer B. Obtaining follow-up interviews for treatment evaluation. J. Substance Abuse Treat. 1995; 12: 95–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington D. P. Longitudinal research strategies: Advantages, problems, and prospects. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 1991; 30: 369–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick S. Managing attrition in clinical research. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 1988; 8: 499–515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried P. A. Who is it going to be? Subject selection issues in prenatal drug exposure research. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Methodological Issues in Epidemiological, Prevention, and Treatment Research on Drug-Exposed Women and Their Children. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1992, [DHHS Publication (ADM)92–1881].
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert F. S., Maxwell P. J. Predicting attendance at follow-up evaluation in alcohol treatment outcome research. J. Stud. Alcohol 1987; 48: 569–573
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein P. J., Abbott W., Paige W., Sobel I., Soto F. Tracking procedures in follow-up studies of drug abusers. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 1977; 4: 21–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green S. M., Navratil J. L., Loeber R., Lahey B. B. Potential dropouts in a longitudinal study: Prevalence, stability, and associated characteristics. J. Child Fam. Stud. 1994; 3: 69–87
   Google Scholar
• Hansen W. B., Collins L. M., Malotte C. K., Johnson C. A., Fielding J. E. Attrition in prevention research. J. Behav. Med. 1985; 8: 261–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard K. I., Cox W. M., Saunders S. M. Attrition in substance abuse comparative treatment research: The illusion of randomization. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Psychotherapy and Counseling in the Treatment of Drug Abuse. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1990, [DHHS Publication (ADM)90–1722].
   Google Scholar
• Howard K. I., Krause M. S., Orlinsky D. E. The attrition dilemma: Toward a new strategy for psychotherapy research. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1986; 1: 106–110
   Google Scholar
• Hudson W. W. The Clinical Measurement Package: A Field Manual. Dorsey Press, Chicago, IL 1982
   Google Scholar
• Jurs S. B., Glass G. V. The effect of experimental mortality on the internal and external validity of the randomized experiment. J. Exp. Educ. 1971; 40: 971–976
   Google Scholar
• Laporte D. J., McLellan A. T., Erdlen F. R., Parente R. J. Treatment outcome as a function of follow-up difficulty in substance abusers. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1981; 49: 112–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackenzie A., Funderburk F. R., Allen R. P., Stefan R. L. The characteristics of alcoholics frequently lost to follow-up. J. Stud. Alcohol 1985; 48: 119–123
   Google Scholar
• McLellan A. T., Kushner H., Metzger D., Peters R., Smith I., Grissom G., Pattinati H., Argeriou M. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J. Substance Abuse Treat. 1992; 9: 199–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan A. T., Luborsky L., Cacciola J., Griffith J., Evans F., Barr H. L., O'Brien C. P. New data from the Addiction Severity Index: Reliability and validity in three centers. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1985; 173: 412–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson-Zlupko L., Kauffman E., Morrison D. M. Gender differences in drug addiction and treatment: Implications for social work interventions with substance-abusing women. Soc. Work 1995; 40: 45–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurco D. N., Lerner M. The feasibility of locating addicts in the community. Int. J. Addict. 1971; 6: 51–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles N., Flaherty D. G., Day N. L. Retention of resistant subjects in longitudinal studies: Description and procedures. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 1994; 20: 87–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudy E., Estok P. J., Kerr M. E., Menzel L. Research incentives: Money versus gifts. Nurs. Res. 1994; 43: 253–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russe B. R., McBride D. C, McCoy C. B., Inciardi J. A. An analysis of the accessibility and nonaccessibility of patients in a follow-up study. Int. J. Addict. 1977; 12: 707–716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw W. S., Cronan T. A., Christie M. D. Predictors of attrition in health intervention research among older subjects with osteoarthritis. Health Psychol. 1994; 5: 421–431
   Google Scholar
• Smith I. E., Dent D. Z., Coles C. D., Falek A. A comparison study of treated and untreated pregnant and postpartum cocaine-abusing women. J. Substance Abuse Treat. 1992; 9: 343–348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow D. L., Tebes J. K., Arthur M. Panel attrition and external validity in adolescent substance use research. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1992; 60: 804–807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell L. C. Alcohol research outcome evaluation: Contributions from behavioral research. Alcoholism: New Directions in Behavioral Research and Treatment, P. E. Nathan, G. A. Marlatt. Plenum Press, New York, NY 1978
   Google Scholar
• Sobell L. C, Sobell M. B. Driver records: An aid in follow-up tracking and verification of self-reports of alcoholics. Int. J. Addict. 1977; 12: 429–438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young C. L., Dombrowski M. Psychosocial influences on research subject recruitment, enrollment and retention. Soc. Work Health Care 1990; 14: 43–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar