Effect of degree of methoxylation and particle size on compression properties and compactibility of pectin powders

References

• Kertesz ZI. The pectic substances. New York/London: Interscience publishing; 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Sungthongjeen S, Pitaksuteepong T, Somsiri A, Sriamornsak P. Studies on pectins as potential hydrogel matrices for controlled-release drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999;25(12):1271–1276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sriamornsak P, Thirawong N, Weerapol Y, Nunthanid J, Sungthongjeen S. Swelling and erosion of pectin matrix tablets and their impact on drug release behavior. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;67(1):211–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashford M, Fell J, Attwood D, Sharma H, Woodhead P. Studies on pectin formulations for colonic drug-delivery. J Control Release 1994;30(3):225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Mura P, Maestrelli F, Cirri M, Rodriguez MLG, Alvarez AMR. Development of enteric-coated pectin-based matrix tablets for colonic delivery of theophylline. J Drug Target 2003;11(6):365–371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim H, Venkatesh G, Fassihi R. Compactibility characterization of granular pectin for tableting operation using a compaction simulator. Int J Pharm [Article]. 1998;161(2):149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Salbu L, Bauer-Brandl A, Tho I. Direct compression behavior of low- and high-methoxylated pectins. AAPS PharmSciTech 2010;11(1):18–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordström J, Klevan I, Alderborn G. A particle rearrangement index based on the Kawakita powder compression equation. J Pharm Sci 2009;98(3):1053–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klevan I, Nordstrom J, Bauer-Brandl A, Alderborn G. On the physical interpretation of the initial bending of a Shapiro-Konopicky-Heckel compression profile. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;71(2):395–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klevan I, Nordstrom J, Tho I, Alderborn G. A statistical approach to evaluate the potential use of compression parameters for classification of pharmaceutical powder materials. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2010;75:425–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakita K, Hattori I, Kishigami M. Characteristic constants in Kawakita’s powder compression equation. J Powder Bulk Solids Technol 1977;1:3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro I. Compaction of powders. 11. Application of the general equation to both metal powders and ceramic powders. In: Lall C, Neupaver AJ, editors. Advances in powder metallurgy & particulate materials – 1994, Vol. 3 – compaction, sintering and secondary operations. Princeton: Metal Powder Industries Fed; 1994:41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hausner HH. Friction conditions in a mass of metal powder. Int J Powder Metall 1967;3(4):7–13.
   Google Scholar
• 2.9.36 Powder flow [database on the Internet]. European Pharmacopoeia Online, 6th ed. 2010 (6.6). Accessed 18 March 2010 from the website: http://online6.edqm.eu/ep606/#doc_31_of_382.
   Google Scholar
• Carr RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng 1965;72:163–168.
   Google Scholar
• 2.9.34 Bulk density and tapped density of powders [database on the Internet]. European Pharmacopoeia Online, 6th ed. 2010 (6.6). Accessed 18 March 2010 from the website: http://online6.edqm.eu/ep606/#doc_29_of_384.
   Google Scholar
• Klevan I, Haware RV, Reichenbach M, Bauer-Brandl A, editors. A new tablet press simulator device for extremely accurate measurement of time-resolved forces and displacements based on an electromechanical press. Pharmaceutical Sciences World Congress; 2007; Amsterdam. The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kawakita K, Lüdde K-H. Some considerations on powder compression equations. Powder Technol 1971;4(2):61–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Kaushal AM, Bansal AK. Effect of particle size and compression force on compaction behavior and derived mathematical parameters of compressibility. Pharm Res 2007;24(1):111–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicklasson F, Alderborn G. Analysis of the compression mechanics of pharmaceutical agglomerates of different porosity and composition using the Adams and Kawakita equations. Pharm Res 2000;17(8):949–954.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shapiro I. Compaction of powders. 10. Development of a general compaction equation. In: Lawley A, Swanson A, editors. Advances in powder metallurgy & particulate materials – 1993, Vol. 3 – Modeling, design, and computational methods. Princeton: Metal Powder Industries Fed; 1993:229–243.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye BH. Permeability techniques for characterizing fine powders. Powder Technol 1967;1:11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Nicklasson F, Alderborn G. Compression shear strength and tableting behavior of microcrystalline cellulose agglomerates modulated by a solution binder (polyethylene glycol). Pharm Res 2001;18(6):873–877.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alderborn G, Duberg M, Nystrom C. Studies on direct compression of tablets. 10. Measurement of tablet surface-area by permeametry. Powder Technol 1985;41(1):49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Alderborn G. Tablets and compaction. In: Aulton ME, editor. Pharmaceutics The science of dosage form design. 2nd ed. London: Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:397–440.
   Google Scholar
• Alderborn G, Nystrom C. Studies on direct compression of tablets. 3. The effect on tablet strength of changes in particle-shape and texture obtained by milling. Acta Pharm Suec 1982;19(2):147–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heckel RW. Density-pressure relationships in powder compaction. Trans Metall Soc AIME 1961;221(4):671–675.
   Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans Metall Soc Aime 1961;221(5):1001–1008.
   Google Scholar
• Duberg M, Nystrom C. Studies on direct compression of tablets. 17. Porosity pressure curves for the characterization of volume reduction-mechanisms in powder compression. Powder Technol 1986;46(1):67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Fell JT, Newton JM. Determination of tablet strength by diametral-compression test. J Pharm Sci 1970;59(5):688–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. The compaction of pharmaceutical and other model materials – a pragmatic approach. Chem Eng Sci [Article] 1987;42(4):903–911.
   Google Scholar
• Sebhatu T, Ahlneck C, Alderborn G. The effect of moisture content on the compression and bond-formation properties of amorphous lactose particles. Int J Pharm 1997;146(1):101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Alderborn G, Nystrom C. Studies on direct compression of tablets. 14. The effect of powder fineness on the relation between tablet permeametry surface-area and compaction pressure. Powder Technol 1985;44(1):37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Alderborn G. Particle dimensions. In: Alderborn G. Nystrom C, editors. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1996:245–282.
   Google Scholar