The reality of in-line tablet coating

References

• Sohi H, Sultana Y, Khar RK. Taste masking technologies in oral pharmaceuticals: recent developments and approaches. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2004;30:429–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerea M, Zheng W, Young CR, McGinity JW. A novel powder coating process for attaining taste masking and moisture protective films applied to tablets. Int J Pharm 2004;279:127–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmori S, Ohno Y, Makino T, Kashihara T. Application of an electronic nose system for evaluation of unpleasant odor in coated tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2005;59:289–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando M, Ito R, Ozeki Y, Nakayama Y, Nabeshima T. Evaluation of a novel sugar coating method for moisture protective tablets. Int J Pharm 2007;336:319–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bechard SR, Quraishi O, Kwong E. Film coating: effect of titanium dioxide concentration and film thickness on the photostability of nifedipine. Pharm Res (New York) 1992;9(10 Suppl.):S148.
   Google Scholar
• Pearnchob N, Siepmann J, Bodmeier R. Pharmaceutical applications of shellac: moisture-protective and taste-masking coatings and extended-release matrix tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2003;29:925–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole GC. Introduction and overview of pharmaceutical coating. In: Cole GC, editor. Pharmaceutical Coating Technology. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1995, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Sawada T, Kondo H, Nakashima H, Sako K, Hayashi M. Time-release compression-coated core tablet containing nifedipine for chronopharmacotherapy. Int J Pharm 2004;280:103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha VR, Singh A, Singh S, Bhinge JR. Compression coated systems for colonic delivery of 5-fluorouracil. J Pharm Pharmacol 2007;59:359–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter SC. Coating of tablets and multiparticulates. In: Aulton ME, editor. Aulton’s Pharmaceutics: The Design and Manufacture of Medicines, 3rd edition. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2007, pp. 500–514.
   Google Scholar
• Marvola M, Rajaniemi M, Marttila E, Vahervuo K, Sothmann A. Effect of dosage form and formulation factors on the adherence of drugs to the esophagus. J Pharm Sci 1983;7:259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Channer KS, Virjee JP. The effect of formulation on oesophageal transit. J Pharm Pharmacol 1985;37:126–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvola M, Nykänen P, Rautio S, Isonen N, Autere A. Enteric polymers as binders and coating materials in multiple-unit site-specific drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Sci 1999;7:259–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgaard AB, Højsted J, Hansen R, Møller-Sonnergaard J, Christrup LL. Patients’ evaluation of shape, size and colour of solid dosage forms. Pharm World Sci 2001;23:185–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi F, Ford JL, Rubinstein MH, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR. Comparative study of drug release from pellets coated with HPMC or Surelease. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2000;26:651–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta VK, Beckert TE, Price JC. A novel pH- and time-based multi-unit potential colonic drug delivery system. I. Development. Int J Pharm 2001;213:83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz P, Tho I, Kleinebudde P. A new multiparticulate delayed release system. 2. Coating formulation and properties of free films. J Control Release 1997;47:191–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maganti L, Celik M. Compaction studies on pellets: II. Coated pellets. Int J Pharm 1994;147:95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Bodmeier R. Tabletting of coated pellets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1997;43:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner KG, Krumme M, Schmidt PC. Pellet containing tablets. Examination of distribution and deformation behaviour. STP Pharma Sci 2000;10:327–332.
   Google Scholar
• Jones BE. Hard gelatin capsules. In: Aulton ME, editor. Aulton’s Pharmaceutics: The Design and Manufacture of Medicines, 3rd edition. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2007, pp. 515–526.
   Google Scholar
• Alderborn G. Tablets and compaction. In: Aulton ME, editor. Aulton’s Pharmaceutics: The Design and Manufacture of Medicines, 3rd edition. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2007, pp. 441–482.
   Google Scholar
• Cole GC. The coating process In: Cole GC, editor. Pharmaceutical Coating Technology. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1995, pp. 170–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bose S, Bogner RH. Solventless pharmaceutical coating processes: a review. Pharm Dev Technol 2007;12:115–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DM, Percel PJ. Coating of multiparticulates using molten materials. In: Ghebre-Sellassie I, editor. Multiparticulate Oral Drug Delivery. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker; 1994, pp. 113–142.
   Google Scholar
• Achanta AS, Adusumilli PS, James KW, Rhodes CT. Development of hot melt coating methods. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1997;23:387–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan M, Gupta VK. A novel concept for the production of compression-coated tablets. Pharm Technol Eur 2002;14:46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer D, Zheng W, Coots LB, McGinity JW. Influence of processing parameters and formulation factors on the drug release from tablets powder-coated with Eudragit L 100-55. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;67:464–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reees LA, Feather DH, Nelson DH, Whiteman M, inventors. Electrostatic application of powder material to solid dosage forms. US Patent 2004/6806017.
   Google Scholar
• Wang JZY, Bogner RH. Solvent free film coating using a novel photocurable polymer. Int J Pharm 1995;119:81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies C, Ribeiro Dos Santos I, Richard J, VandeVelde V, Rolland H, Benoit JP. A supercritical fluid-based coating technology 1: process considerations. J Microencapsul 2003;20:87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole GC, editor. Coating Pans and Coating Columns. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Tang ESK, Chan LW, Heng PWS. Coating of multiparticulates for sustained release. Am J Drug Deliv 2005;3:17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann K. Coating of multiparticulates using polymeric solutions. Formulation and process considerations. In: Ghebre-Sellassie I, editor. Multiparticulate Oral Drug Delivery. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker; 1994, pp. 51–78.
   Google Scholar
• Walter KT, Neidlinger MA, inventors. Apparatus for coating tablets. US Patent 2001/6209479.
   Google Scholar
• Heng PW, Chan LW, Tang ES. Use of swirling airflow to enhance coating performance of bottom spray fluid bed coaters. Int J Pharm 2006;327:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkmire AP, Liew CV. An accurate method of coating tablets with active pharmaceutical ingredients. 5th European Coating Symposium 2003 Proceeding s2003:279–284.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson M, Josefson M, Langkilde FW, Wahlund KG. Monitoring of a film coating process for tablets using near infrared reflectance spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 1999;20:27–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ramos JD, Findlay WP, Peck G, Morris KR. Quantitative analysis of film coating in a pan coater based on in-line sensor measurements. AAPS PharmSciTech 2005;6:E127–E136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer L, Leuenberger H. Applications of near infrared spectroscopy in the full-scale manufacturing of pharmaceutical solid dosage forms. Pharm Ind 2009;71:672–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer L, Leuenberger H. Terahertz pulsed imaging and near infrared imaging to monitor the coating process of pharmaceutical tablets. Int J Pharm 2009;370:8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese I, Cetinkaya C. Noncontact photo-acoustic defect detection in drug tablets. J Pharm Sci 2007;96:2125–2133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akseli I, Cetinkaya C. Drug tablet thickness estimations using air-coupled acoustics. Int J Pharm 2008;351:165–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wikström H, Romero-Torres S, Wongweragiat S, Williams JA, Grant ER, Taylor LS. On-line content uniformity determination of tablets using low-resolution Raman spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 2006;60:672–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. Guidance for industry: PAT—a framework for innovative pharmaceutical development, manufacturing and quality assurance, USA, 2004. (www.fda.gov).
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Hansell J, Nuneviller F 3rd, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR. Evaluation of recent advances in continuous film coating processes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2010;36:227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkley A, Levine S, Signorino C. The evolution and evaluation of tablet coatings. Tablets and capsules, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Driam. Film coating with the continuous cycled coater DRIACONTI-T Pharma. Driam, 2009. (www.driamusa.com).
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara D, Marjeram J, inventors. Continuous feed tablet coating system. US Patent 2008/01936322008.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas-Engineering. Thomas Engineering Continuous Coater. Total Coverage, Every Tablet, Every Process, Every Time. Thomas Engineering; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mancoff W. Film coating compressed tablets in a continuous process. Pharm Technol 1998;22:12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Tang ES, Liew CV, Er DZ, Liu X, Wigmore AJ, Heng PW. Study of coat quality of tablets coated by an on-line Supercell coater. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8:E63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkmire AP, Walter KT. Enteric tablet coating. Pharma Magazine 2006;2:28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham C, Neely C, Kevra A. Investigation of a new coating process for the application of enteric coatings to small tablet samples. AAPS Annual meeting and Exposition Poster, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan-Hewitt WC. Modelling the compression behaviour of parcel assemblies from the mechanical properties of individual particles. In: Alderborn G, Nystrom C, editors. Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker; 1996, pp. 375–417.
   Google Scholar
• Adolfsson A, Nystrom C. Tablet strength, porosity, elasticity and solid state structure of tablets compressed at high loads. Int J Pharm 1996;132:95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong NA, Haines-Nutt RF. Elastic recovery and surface area changes in compacted powder systems. J Pharm Pharmacol 1972;24:Suppl:135P–Suppl:1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picker KM. Time dependence of elastic recovery for characterization of tableting materials. Pharm Dev Technol 2001;6:61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croll SG. Internal stress in a solvent-cast thermoplastic coating. J Coatings Technol 1978;50:33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC. A reappraisal of the equations used to predict the internal stresses in film coatings applied to tablet substrates. J Pharm Pharmacol 1983;35:112–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okutgen E, Hogan JE, Aulton ME. Effects of tablet core dimensional instability on the generation of internal stresses within film coats. 3. Exposure to temperatures and relative humidities which mimic the film coating process. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1991;17:2005–2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croll SG. Origin of residual internal-stress in solvent-cast thermoplastic coatings. J Appl Polym Sci 1979;23:847–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiestand EN, Wells JE, Peot CB, Ochs JF. Physical processes of tableting. J Pharm Sci 1977;66:510–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picker KM. “Soft tableting”: a new concept to tablet pressure-sensitive materials. Pharm Dev Technol 2004;9:107–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okor RS. Brittle fracture during tableting—a problem for the pharmaceutical industry. Trop J Pharm Res 2005;4:481–482.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC. The expansion and contraction of tablets during film coating—a possible contributory factor in the creation of stresses within the film? J Pharm Pharmacol 1980;32:851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippie EG, Morehead WT. Structure evolution of tablets during compression unloading. J Pharm Sci 1994;83:708–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okutgen E, Hogan JE, Aulton ME. Quantitative estimation of internal stress development in aqueous HPMC tablet film coats. Int J Pharm 1995;119:193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maarschalk KV, Zuurman K, Vromans H, Bolhuis GK, Lerk CF. Porosity expansion of tablets as a result of bonding and deformation of particulate solids. Int J Pharm 1996;140:185–193.
   Google Scholar
• Maarschalk K, Zuurman K, Vromans H, Bolhuis GK, Lerk CF. Stress relaxation of compacts produced from viscoelastic materials. Int J Pharm 1997;151:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Picker KM. The use of carrageenan in mixture with microcrystalline cellulose and its functionality for making tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1999;48:27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi SK, Oates RJ, Mitchell AG. Estimation of elastic recovery, work of decompression and Young’s modulus using a rotary tablet press. J Pharm Pharmacol 1992;44:459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe RC, Roberts RJ. Mechanical properties. In: Alderborn G, Nyström C, editors. Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996, pp. 283–322.
   Google Scholar
• Zuurman K, Van der Voort Maarschalk K, Bolhuis GK. Effect of magnesium stearate on bonding and porosity expansion of tablets produced from materials with different consolidation properties. Int J Pharm 1999;179:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachrimanis K, Malamataris S. “Apparent” Young’s elastic modulus and radial recovery for some tableted pharmaceutical excipients. Eur J Pharm Sci 2004;21:197–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye CK, Sun CC, Amidon GE. Evaluation of the effects of tableting speed on the relationships between compaction pressure, tablet tensile strength, and tablet solid fraction. J Pharm Sci 2005;94:465–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maarschalk KV, Vromans H, Groenendijk W, Bolhuis GK, Lerk CF. Effect of water on deformation and bonding of pregelatinized starch compacts. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1997;44:253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutt T, Fell JT, Rue PJ, Spring MS. Granulation and compaction of a model system. 2. Stress relaxation. Int J Pharm 1987;39:157–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourkavoos N, Peck GE. The effect of swelling characteristics of superdisintegrants on the aqueous coating solution penetration into the tablet matrix during the film coating process. Pharm Res 1993;10:1363–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock BC, Rowe RC. The thermal expansion of pharmaceutical solids. STP Pharm Sci 1998;8:213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Pilpel N, Malamataris S, Bangudu AB, Esezobo S, Itiola OA. Plastoelasticity and tabletting of single and multicomponent powders. Powder Technol 1992;69:195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruotsalainen M, Heinamaki J, Antikainen O, Yliruusi J. Time-dependent dimensional changes and film adhesion of coated tablets. STP Pharm Sci 2002;12:385–389.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall K. Compression/Compaction. FMC Corporation, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Garr JSM, Rubinstein MH. The effect of rate of force application on the properties of microcrystalline cellulose and dibasic calcium phosphate mixtures. Int J Pharm 1991;73:75–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anuar MS, Briscoe BJ. The elastic relaxation of starch tablets during ejection. Powder Technol 2009;195:96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain S. Mechanical properties of powders for compaction and tableting: an overview. Pharm Sci Technol Today 1999;2:20–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rippie EG, Danielson DW. Viscoelastic stress/strain behavior of pharmaceutical tablets: analysis during unloading and postcompression periods. J Pharm Sci 1981;70:476–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train D. An investigation into the compaction of powders. J Pharm Pharmacol 1956;8:745–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullarney MP, Hancock BC. Mechanical property anisotropy of pharmaceutical excipient compacts. Int J Pharm 2006;314:9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulton ME, Travers DN, White PJ. Strain recovery of compacts on extended storage. J Pharm Pharmacol 1973;25:Suppl:79P–Suppl:86P.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe RC. The adhesion of film coatings to tablet surfaces—a problem of stress distribution. J Pharm Pharmacol 1981;33:610–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton LA, McGinity JW. Adhesion of polymeric films to pharmaceutical solids. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1999;47:3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton LA, McGinity JW. Influence of tablet hardness and hydrophobicity on the adhesive properties of an acrylic resin copolymer. Pharm Dev Technol 1996;1:381–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen TC, Lin WJ, Chen DL. Effect of temperature gradient on simultaneously experimental determination of thermal expansion coefficients and elastic modulus of thin film materials. J Appl Phys. 2004;96:3800–3806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe RC, Forse SF. The effect of polymer molecular weight on the incidence of film cracking and splitting on film coated tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol 1980;32:583–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton LA, Porter SC. Guest Editor’s comments. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2010;36:127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BASF. Technical Information: Kollicoat IR. Germany: Limburgerhof; 2010, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers T, Sheskey P, Furukawa H, Mallon C, Trampe M, Holbrook D. Investigation of a novel hypromellose polymer for high productivity tablet coating applications. Annual Meeting and Exposition of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), Atlanta, Georgia, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Parissaux X, Joshi A, Dusautois C, Bihan GL, Lefevre P. Functional advantages of a novel modified starch over HPMC in aqueous film coating of tablets. AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition Poster, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kai Z. Suitability of a new aqueous polymer dispersion for moisture barrier coating of soft gelatin capsules. BASF Corporation, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Porter SC, Ridgway K. An evaluation of the properties of enteric coating polymers: measurement of glass transition temperature. J Pharm Pharmacol 1983;35:341–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe RC, Forse SF. Bridging of the intagliations on film coated tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol 1982;34:282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel M, Patel JM, Lemberger AP. Water vapor permeation of selected cellulose ester films. J Pharm Sci 1964;53:286–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulton ME. Mechanical properties of film coats. In: Cole GC, editor. Pharmacaeutical Coating Technology. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1995, pp. 288–362.
   Google Scholar
• Müller J, Knop K, Thies J, Uerpmann C, Kleinebudde P. Feasibility of Raman spectroscopy as PAT tool in active coating. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2010;36:234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Chang SY, Kiang S, Marchut A, Lyngberg O, Wang J et al. Modeling of pan coating processes: prediction of tablet content uniformity and determination of critical process parameters. J Pharm Sci 2010;99:3213–3225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton LA, McGinity JW. Influence of insoluble excipients on film coating systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2002;28:225–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson SHM, Rowe RC, White EFT. Determination of the critical pigment volume concentrations of pigmented film coating formulations using gloss measurement. Int J Pharm 1988;45:245–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funke W, Zorll U, Murthy BGK. Interfacial effects in solid paint films related to some film properties. J Paint Technol 1969;41:210–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton LA, McGinity JW. Influence of pigment concentration and particle size on adhesion of an acrylic resin copolymer to tablet compacts. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999;25:597–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe RC, Roberts RJ. Simulation of crack-propagation in tablet film coatings containing pigments. Int J Pharm 1992;78:49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC. Modulus enhancement in pigmented tablet film coating formulations. Int J Pharm 1983;14:355–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okhamafe AO, York P. Effect of solids polymer interactions on the properties of some aqueous based tablet film coating formulations. 2. Mechanical characteristics. Int J Pharm 1984;22:273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC. The cracking of film coatings on film-coated tablets—a theoretical approach with practical implications. J Pharm Pharmacol 1981;33:423–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson SHM, Rowe RC, White EFT. The mechanical properties of pigmented tablet coating formulations and their resistance to cracking. 2. Dynamic mechanical measurement. Int J Pharm 1989;50:163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson SHM, Rowe RC, White EFT. Mechanical properties of pigmented tablet coating formulations and their resistance to cracking. 1. Static mechanical measurement. Int J Pharm 1988;48:63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Porter SC, Felton LA. Techniques to assess film coatings and evaluate film-coated products. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2010;36:128–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe RC. The measurement of the adhesion of film coatings to tablet surfaces: the effect of tablet porosity, surface roughness and film thickness. J Pharm Pharmacol 1978;30:343–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta AM. Processing and equipment considerations for aqueous coatings. In: McGinity JW, Felton LA, editors. Aqueous Polymeric Coatings for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2008, pp. 67–103.
   Google Scholar
• Felton LA, Perry WL. A novel technique to quantify film–tablet interfacial thickness. Pharm Dev Technol 2002;7:43–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahyadi C, Chan LW, Heng PWS. High-speed air suspension in-line coating. AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition Poster (submitted), Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Okutgen E, Hogan JE, Aulton ME. Effects of tablet core dimensional instability on the generation of internal stresses within film coats. 1. Influence of temperature changes during the film coating process. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1991;17:1177–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan JE. Film coating materials and their properties. In: Cole GC, editor. Pharmaceutical Coating Technology. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1995, pp. 6–52.
   Google Scholar
• Amighi K, Moes A. Influence of plasticizer concentration and storage conditions on the drug release rate from Eudragit(R) RS30D film-coated sustained-release theophylline pellets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1996;42:29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter SC, Sackett G, Liu L. Development, optimization, and scale-up of process parameters: pan coating. In: Qiu Y CY, Zhang GGZ, Liu L, Porter WR, editors. Developing Solid Oral Dosage Forms—Pharmaceutical Theory and Practice. New York, USA: Elsevier Inc.; 2009, pp. 761–805.
   Google Scholar
• Ngui MO, Mallapragada SK. Mechanistic investigation of drying regimes during solvent removal from poly(vinyl alcohol) films. J Appl Polym Sci 1999;72:1913–1920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Wang Q, Li L. Evaporation behaviour of water and its plasticizing effect in modified poly(vinyl alcohol) systems. Polym Int 2003;52:1820–1826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar