Deproteinized natural rubber film forming polymeric solutions for nicotine transdermal delivery

References

• Spernath A, Aserin A, Sintov AC, Garti N. Phosphatidylcholine embedded micellar systems: Enhanced permeability through rat skin. J Colloid Interface Sci 2008;318:421–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Peng Z, Kong LX, Huang MF, Li PW. Natural rubber nanocomposite reinforced with nano silica. Polym Eng Sci 2008;48:1674–1677.
   Google Scholar
• Rippel MM, Lee L-T, Leite CAP, Galembeck F. Skim and cream natural rubber particles: Colloidal properties, coalescence and film formation. J Colloid Interface Sci 2003;268:330–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turjanmaa K, Alenius H, Mäkinen-Kiljunen S, Reunala T, Palosuo T. Natural rubber latex allergy. Allergy 1996;51:593–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeang HY, Arif SA, Yusof F, Sunderasan E. Allergenic proteins of natural rubber latex. Methods 2002;27:32–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suksaeree J, Boonme P, Taweepreda W, Ritthidej GC, Pichayakorn W. Characterization, in vitro release and permeation studies of nicotine transdermal patches prepared from deproteinized natural rubber latex blends. Chem Eng Res Des 2012;90:906–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenta C, Auner BG. The use of polymers for dermal and transdermal delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004;58:279–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wokovich AM, Prodduturi S, Doub WH, Hussain AS, Buhse LF. Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) adhesion as a critical safety, efficacy and quality attribute. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006;64:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar HO, Ghorab M, Mahmoud AA, Makram TS, Ghoneim AM. Rapid pain relief using transdermal film forming polymeric solution of ketorolac. Pharm Dev Technol 2011. doi: 10.3109/10837450.2011.627867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra A, Pal R, Majumdar SS, Talwar GP, Singh O. Biphasic testosterone delivery profile observed with two different transdermal formulations. Pharm Res 1997;14:1264–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurdo Schroeder I, Franke P, Schaefer UF, Lehr C-M. Development and characterization of film forming polymeric solutions for skin drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;65:111–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurdo Schroeder I, Franke P, Schaefer UF, Lehr C-M. Delivery of ethinylestradiol from film forming polymeric solutions across human epidermis in vitro and in vivo in pigs. J Control Release 2007;118:196–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CR, Munday DL. Development and evaluation of a biphasic buccal adhesive tablet for nicotine replacement therapy. Int J Pharm 2002;237:215–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz D. Nicotine, its metabolism and an overview of its biological effects. Toxicon 2004;43:619–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose JE. (2006). Nicotine replacement therapies and other nicotinic strategies. In: George TP, ed. Medication Treatments for Nicotine Dependence. Boca Raton: Chemical Rubber Company Press, 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Olivier J-C, Rabouan S, Couet W. In vitro comparative studies of two marketed transdermal nicotine delivery systems: Nicopatch® and Nicorette®. Int J Pharm 2003;252:133–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Casiraghi A, Cilurzo F, Montanari L. Development of local patches containing melilot extract and ex vivo-in vivo evaluation of skin permeation. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000;10:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichayakorn W, Suksaeree J, Boonme P, Amnuaikit T, Taweepreda W, Ritthidej GC. Deproteinized natural rubber latex/hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose blending polymers for nicotine matrix films. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012;51:8442–8452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagariya K, Jadon PS, Naruka PS, Chauhan CS. Formulation development and characterization of aceclofenac gel using poloxamer 407. J Chem Pharm Res 2010;2:357–363.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat NS. Evaluation of glycofurol-based gel as a new vehicle for topical application of naproxen. AAPS PharmSciTech 2010;11:1138–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigi A, Cojazzi G, Panzavolta S, Rubini K, Roveri N. Mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin films at different degrees of glutaraldehyde crosslinking. Biomaterials 2001;22:763–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM International. (2003). Standard test methods for vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers-tension D412. West Conshohocken.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International. (2001). Standard test method for peel resistance of adhesives (T-peel test) D1876. West Conshohocken.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International. (2003). Standard test methods for loop tack D6195. West Conshohocken.
   Google Scholar
• Pongjanyakul T, Prakongpan S, Priprem A. Acrylic matrix type nicotine transdermal patches: In vitro evaluations and batch-to-batch uniformity. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2003;29:843–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songkro S, Purwo Y, Becket G, Rades T. Investigation of newborn pig skin as an in vitro animal model for transdermal drug delivery. STP Pharma Sci 2003;13:133–139.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang B-Y, Jung B-H, Chung S-J, Lee M-H, Shim C-K. In vitro skin permeation of nicotine from proliposomes. J Control Release 1997;49:177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L-C, Chen X-G, Yu L-J, Li P-W. Controlled drug release through carboxymethyl-chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) blend films. Polym Eng Sci 2007;47:1373–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa P, Sousa Lobo JM. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;13:123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;48:139–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichayakorn W, Suksaeree J, Boonme P, Taweepreda W, Ritthidej GC. Preparation of deproteinized natural rubber latex and properties of films formed by itself and several adhesive polymer blends. 2012 (In manuscript submission).
   Google Scholar
• Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO. Method for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944;82:377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hukkanen J, Jacob P 3rd, Benowitz NL. Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol Rev 2005;57:79–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utracki LA. (2002). Introduction to polymer blends. In: Utracki LA, ed. Polymer Blends Handbook. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1–96.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz M, Ghannam MM. Influence of titanium chloride addition on the optical and dielectric properties of PVA films. Phys B 2010;405:958–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golomb G, Fisher P, Rahamim E. The relationship between drug release rate, particle size and swelling of silicone matrices. J Control Release 1990;12:121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limpongsa E, Umprayn K. Preparation and evaluation of diltiazem hydrochloride diffusion-controlled transdermal delivery system. AAPS PharmSciTech 2008;9:464–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo M, Song Y, Zheng Q. Preparation and properties of wheat gluten/methylcellulose binary blend film casting from aqueous ammonia: A comparison with compression molded composites. J Food Eng 2009;91:415–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aouada FA, Chiou B-S, Orts WJ, Mattoso LHC. Physicochemical and morphological properties of poly(acrylamide) and methylcellulose hydrogels: Effects of monomer, crosslinker and polysaccharide compositions. Polym Eng Sci 2009;49:2467–2474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvainen M, Sutinen R, Somppi M, Paronen P, Poso A. Predicting plasticization efficiency from three-dimensional molecular structure of a polymer plasticizer. Pharm Res 2001;18:1760–1766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvainen M, Sutinen R, Peltonen S, Mikkonen H, Maunus J, Vähä-Heikkilä K et al. Enhanced film-forming properties for ethyl cellulose and starch acetate using n-alkenyl succinic anhydrides as novel plasticizers. Eur J Pharm Sci 2003;19:363–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofori-Kwakye K, Fell JT. Leaching of pectin from mixed films containing pectin, chitosan and HPMC intended for biphasic drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2003;250:251–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilurzo F, Minghetti P, Sinico C. Newborn pig skin as model membrane in in vitro drug permeation studies: A technical note. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8:E94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Príborský J, Takayama K, Nagai T, Waitzová D, Elis J. Evaluation of in vitro and in situ transdermal absorption of drugs in pig and rat skin. Chem Pharm Bull 1987;35:4915–4920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songkro S, Rades T, Becket G. Effects of some terpenes on the in vitro permeation of LHRH through newborn pig skin. Pharmazie 2009;64:110–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AC, Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004;56:603–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar