Novel organogels for topical delivery of naproxen: design, physicochemical characteristics and in vitro drug permeation

References

• Laneuville O, Breuer DK, Dewitt DL, et al. Differential inhibition of human prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases-1 and -2 by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Pharm Exp Ther 1994;271:927–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan KC, Walters MJ, Musee J, et al. Molecular basis for cyclooxygenase inhibition by the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug naproxen. J Biol Chem 2010;285:34950–34959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts DN, Miner PB. Safety aspects and rational use of a naproxen + esomeprazole combination in the treatment of rheumatoid disease. Drug Healthc Patient Saf 2011;3:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundberg GD. Prednisolone and naproxen both work for pain relief in acute gout. Medscape J Med 2008;10:207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lecomte J, Buyse H, Taymans J, Monti T. Treatment of tendinitis and bursitis: a comparison of nimesulide and naproxen sodium in a double-blind parallel trial. Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm 1994;14:29–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin VT, Ballard J, Diamond MP, et al. Relief of menstrual symptoms and migraine with a single-tablet formulation of sumatriptan and naproxen sodium. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014;23:389–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbulut N, Üstüner E, Atakan C, Çölok G. Comparison of the effect of Naproxen, Etodolac and Diclofenac on postoperative sequelsfollowing third molar surgery: a randomised, double-blind, crossover study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014;19:149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubet RA, Steele VE, Juliana MM, Grubbs CJ. Screening agents for preventive efficacy in a bladder cancer model: study design, end points, and gefitinib and naproxen efficacy. J Urol 2010;183:1598–1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Maglio DH, Paz ML, Ferrari A, et al. Alterations in skin immune response throughout chronic UVB irradiation-skin cancer development and prevention by naproxen. Photochem Photobiol 2010;86:146–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Q, Ren F, Xu Z, et al. Preparation of high solubilizable microemulsion of naproxen and its solubilization mechanism. Int J Pharm 2012;426:202–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aabakken L, Bjørnbeth BA, Hofstad B, et al. Comparison of the gastrointestinal side effects of naproxen formulated as plain tablets, enteric-coated tablets, or enteric-coated granules in capsules. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1989;163:65–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kovacevic L, Bernstein J, Valentini RP, et al. Renal papillary necrosis induced by naproxen. Pediatr Nephrol 2003;18:826–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victorino RM, Silveira JC, Baptista A, de Moura MC. Jaundice associated with naproxen. Postgrad Med J 1980;56:368–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood M, Ashby D, Cross P, et al. Advice to use topical or oral ibuprofen for chronic knee pain in older people: randomised controlled trial and patient preference study. BMJ 2008;336:138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemes Z, Steinert PM. Bricks and mortar of the epidermal barrier. Exp Mol Med 1999;31:5–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe MA, Burlingame AL, Whitney J, et al. Human stratum corneum lipids: characterization and regional variations. J Lipid Res 1983;24:120–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trommer H, Neubert RHH. Overcoming the stratum corneum: the modulation of skin penetration. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2006;19:106–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoughton RB. Percutaneous absorption of drugs. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1989;29:55–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagelreiter C, Raffeiner S, Geyerhofer C, et al. Influence of drug content, type of semi-solid vehicle and rheological properties on the skin penetration of the model drug fludrocortisone acetate. Int J Pharm 2013;448:305–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh H, Jun HW, Dzimianski MT, Lu GW. Pharmacokinetic and local tissue disposition studies of naproxen-following topical and systemic administration in dogs and rats. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1997;18:623–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn GL, Stewart B. Percutaneous drug penetration: choosing candidates for transdermal development. Drug Dev Res 1988;13:169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AC, Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004;56:604–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Fang L, Guo J, et al. Effect of counter-ions and penetration enhancers on the skin permeation of flurbiprofen. J Pharm Sci 2010;99:1826–1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadgraft J, Peck J, Williams DG, et al. Mechanisms of action of skin penetration enhancers/retarders: azone and analogues. Int J Pharm 1996;141:17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degim T, Uslu A, Hadgraft J, et al. The effects of azone and capsaicin on the permeation of naproxen through human skin. Int J Pharm 1999;179:21–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane ME. Skin penetration enhancers. Int J Pharm 2013;447:12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto A, Wiechers JW, Kelly CL, et al. Effect of penetration modifiers on the dermal and transdermal delivery of drugs and cosmetic active ingredients. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2008;21:326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squillante E, Needham T, Maniar A, et al. Codiffusion of propylene glycol and dimethyl isosorbide in hairless mouse skin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1998;46:265–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Nie S, Guo H, et al. Effects of Transcutol P on the corneal permeability of drugs and evaluation of its ocular irritation of rabbit eyes. J Pharm Pharmacol 2005;58:45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganem-Quintanar A, Lafforgue C, Falson-Rieg F, Buri P. Evaluation of the transepidermal permeation of diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and skin water loss. Int J Pharm 1997;147:165–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puglia C, Bonina F, Rizza L, et al. Evaluation of percutaneous absorption of naproxen from different liposomal formulations. J Pharm Sci 2010;99:2819–2829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szura D, Ozimek Ł, Przybyło M, et al. The impact of liposomes on transdermal permeation of naproxen-in vitro studies. Acta Pol Pharm 2014;71:145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okur NÜ, Apaydın S, Yavaşoğlu NÜK, et al. Evaluation of skin permeation and anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of new naproxen microemulsion formulations. Int J Pharm 2011;416:136–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajurkar VG, Tambe AB, Deshmukh VK. Topical anti-inflammatory gels of naproxen entrapped in eudragit based microsponge delivery system. J Adv Chem Eng 5:122. DOI: 10.4172/2090-4568.1000122.
   Google Scholar
• Tambade SA, Aloorkar NH, Dabane NS, et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Novel Gel Containing Liquid Crystals of Naproxen. AJADD 2014;2:364–386.
   Google Scholar
• Dharmalingam SR, Kumarappan CT, Yong MWH, et al. An investigation on the naproxen solubility and permeability enhancement in poly(vinyl alcohol) gel for topical application. International Conference on Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (ICMPS’2012); 2012 June 16-17; Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat NS. Evaluation of glycofurol-based gel as a new vehicle for topical application of naproxen. AAPS PharmSciTech 2010;11:1138–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valjakka-Koskela R, Kirjavainen M, Miinkkanen J, et al. Enhancement of percutaneous absorption of naproxen by phospholipids. Int J Pharm 1998;175:225–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar-Chávez JJ, Quintanar-Guerrero D, Ganem-Quintanar A. In vivo skin permeation of sodium naproxen formulated in Pluronic F-127 gels: effect of azone and transcutol. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2005;31:447–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura P, Faucci MT, Bettinetti GP. The influence of polyvinylpyrrolidone on naproxen complexation with hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;13:187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetge E, Du Plessis J, Müller DG, et al. The influence of the physicochemical characteristics and pharmacokinetic properties of selected NSAID's on their transdermal absorption. Int J Pharm 2000;193:261–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco DP, Martínez F. Thermodynamic analysis of the solubility of naproxen in ethanol1water cosolvent mixtures. Phys Chem Liq 2007;45:581–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair A, Jacob S, Al-Dhubiab B, et al. Basic considerations in the dermatokinetics of topical formulations. Braz J Pharm Sci 2013;49:423–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacucina G, Martelli S, Palmieri GF. Rheological, mucoadhesive and release properties of Carbopol gels in hydrophilic cosolvents. Int J Pharm 2004;282:115–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmsten M. Surfactants and polymers in drug delivery. Basel, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova R, Lindman B, Alexandridis P. Effect of pharmaceutically acceptable glycols on the stability of the liquid crystalline gels formed by Poloxamer 407 in water. J Colloid Interface Sci 2002;252:226–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel HR, Patel RP, Patel MM. Poloxamers: a pharmaceutical excipients with therapeutic behaviors. Int J Pharm Tech Res 2009;1:299–303.
   Google Scholar
• Karadzovska D, Riviere JE. Assessing vehicle effects on skin absorption using artificial membrane assays. Eur J Pharm 2013;50:569–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida T, Kadhum WR, Kanai S, et al. Prediction of skin permeation by chemical compounds using the artificial membrane, Strat-M™. Eur J Pharm Sci 2015;67:113–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhse L, Kolinski R, Westenberger B, et al. Topical drug classification. Int J Pharm 2005;295:101–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farinha A, Toscano C, Campos R, et al. Permeation of naproxen from saturated solutions and commercial formulations through synthetic membranes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2003;29:489–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StatSoft, Inc. (2011). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. Available from: www.statsoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Benson HAE. Transdermal drug delivery: penetration enhancement techniques. Curr Drug Deliver 2005;2:23–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song J-S, Sohn Y-T. Crystal forms of naproxen. Arch Pharm Res 2011;34:87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chieng N, Rades T, Aaltonen J. An overview of recent studies on the analysis of pharmaceutical polymorphs. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2011;55:618–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang R-K, Raw A, Lionberger R, Yu L. Generic development of topical dermatologic products: formulation development, process development, and testing of topical dermatologic products. AAPS 2013; 15:41–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokic L, Dapcevic T, Krstonosic V, et al. Rheological characterization of corn starch isolated by alkali method. Food Hydrocolloid 2010;24:172–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Kim YD, Kee DD. Non-Newtonian fluids with a yield stress. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 2005;129:177–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannote M, Flores F, Torres L, Galindo E. Apparent yield stress estimation in xanthan gum solutions and fermentation broths using a low-cost viscometer. Chem Eng J 1991;45:49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyvis TKL, De Smedt SC, Demeester J, Hennink WE. Rheological monitoring of long-term degrading polymer hydrogels. J Rheol 1999;43:933–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyvis TKL, Stubbe BG, Van Steenbergen MJ, et al. A comparison between the use of dynamic mechanical analysis and oscillatory shear rheometry for the characterisation of hydrogels. Int J Pharm 2002;244:163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A-sasutjarit R, Sirivat A, Vayumhasuwan P. Viscoelastic properties of carbopol 940 gels and their relationships to piroxicam diffusion coefficients in gel bases. Pharm Res 2005;22:2134–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu JS, Yu DM, Amidon GL, et al. Viscoelastic properties of polyacrylic acid gels in mixed solvents. Pharm Res 1992;9:1659–1663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TJ, Kennedy JE, Higginbotham CL. Rheological and thermal characteristics of a two phase hydrogel system for potential wound healing applications. J Mater Sci 2010;45:2884–2891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng PWS, Chan LW, Chow KT. Development of novel nonaqueous ethylcellulose gel matrices: rheological and mechanical characterization. Pharm Res 2005;22:676–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MT, Rodríguez-Hornedo N, Ciotti S, Ackermann C. Rheological characterization of topical carbomer gels neutralized to different pH. Pharm Res 2004;21:1192–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson J, Kemblowski Z. Applied Fluid Rheology. London: Elsevier; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF. Textural analysis and flow rheometry of novel, bioadhesive antimicrobial oral gels. Pharm Res 1977;14:450–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF. Textural, viscoelastic and mucoadhesive properties of pharmaceutical gels composed of cellulose polymers. Int J Pharm 1997;151:223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Woolfson D, Djokic J. Texture profile analysis of bioadhesive polymeric semisolids: mechanical characterization and investigation of interactions between formulation components. J Appl Polym Sci 1996;61:2229–2234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratieri T, Gelfuso GM, Rocha EM, et al. A poloxamer/chitosan in situ forming gel with prolonged retention time for ocular delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2010;75:186–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz MT, Karaman S, Dogan M, et al. Characterization of O/W model system meat emulsions using shear creep and creep recovery tests based on mechanical simulation models and their correlation with texture profile analysis (TPA) parameters. J Food Eng 2012;108:327–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The United States Pharmacopoeial Convention. Semisolid drug products-performance tests. USP 36-NF 31: <1724>; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ng S-F, Rouse JJ, Sanderson FD, et al. Validation of a static franz diffusion cell system for in vitro permeation studies. AAPS PharmSciTech 2010;11:1432–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng S-F, Rouse J, Sanderson D, Eccleston G. A comparative study of transmembrane diffusion and permeation of ibuprofen across synthetic membranes using Franz diffusion cells. Pharmaceutics 2010;2:209–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barry BW. Drug delivery routes in skin: a novel approach. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002;54:31–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welin-Berger K, Neelissen JAM, Bergenstâhl B. The effect of rheological behaviour of a topical anaesthetic formulation on the release and permeation rates of the active compound. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;13:309–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar