MCC–mannitol mixtures after roll compaction/dry granulation: percolation thresholds for ribbon microhardness and granule size distribution

References

• Falzone AM, Peck GE, McCabe GP. Effects of changes in roller compactor parameters on granulations produced by compaction. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1992;18:469–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervieu P, Dehont F, Jerome E, et al. Granulation of pharmaceutical powders by compaction – an experimental study. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1994;20:65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guigon P, Simon O. Roll press design – influence of force feed systems on compaction. Powder Technol 2003;130:41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inghelbrecht S, Remon JP. The roller compaction of different types of lactose. Int J Pharm 1998b;166:135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambali B, Baert L, Jans E, Massart DL. Influence of the roll compactor parameter settings and the compression pressure on the buccal bio-adhesive tablet properties. Int J Pharm 2001;220:129–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyenberg W, Vermeire A, Vandervoort J, et al. Effects of roller compaction settings on the preparation of bioadhesive granules and ocular minitablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2005;59:527–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• am Ende MT, Moses SK, Carella AJ, et al. Improving the content uniformity of a low-dose tablet formulation through roller compaction optimization. Pharm Dev Technol 2007;12:391–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souihi N, Josefson M, Tajarobi P, et al. Design space estimation of the roller compaction process. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013;52:12408–12419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy A. Cellulose, Microcrystalline. In: Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME, eds. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press and American Pharmacists Association; 2009: 129–133.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong NA. Mannitol. In: Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME, eds. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press and American Pharmacists Association; 2009: 424–428.
   Google Scholar
• Ragnarsson G. Force-displacement and network measurements. In: Alderborn G, Nystrom C, eds. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1996: 77–97.
   Google Scholar
• Inghelbrecht S, Remon JP. Roller compaction and tableting of microcrystalline cellulose drug mixtures. Int J Pharm 1998a;161:215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herting MG, Klose K, Kleinebudde P. Comparison of different dry binders for roll compaction/dry granulation. Pharm Dev Technol 2007;12:525–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S, Adams M, Gururajan B, et al. The effects of lubrication on roll compaction, ribbon milling and tabletting. Chem Eng Sci 2013;86:9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souihi N, Dumarey M, Wikstrom H, et al. A quality by design approach to investigate the effect of mannitol and dicalcium phosphate qualities on roll compaction. Int J Pharm 2013;447:47–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner CM, Pein M, Breitkreutz J. Roll compaction of granulated mannitol grades and the unprocessed crystalline delta-polymorph. Powder Technol 2015;270:470–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkowska S, Khan KA. Effect of re-compression on the properties of tablets prepared by dry granulation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1983;9:331–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag F, Runge J, Kleinebudde P. Coprocessing of powdered cellulose and magnesium carbonate: direct tableting versus tableting after roll compaction/dry granulation. Pharm Dev Technol 2005;10:353–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herting MG, Kleinebudde P. Roll compaction/dry granulation: effect of raw material particle size on granule and tablet properties. Int J Pharm 2007;338:110–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S, Gururajan B, Reynolds G, et al. A comparative study of roll compaction of free-flowing and cohesive pharmaceutical powders. Int J Pharm 2012;428:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Gandarillas L, Mazor A, Souriou D, et al. Compaction behaviour of dry granulated binary mixtures. Powder Technol 2015;285:62–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer D, Aharony A. Introduction to percolation theory. London: Taylor and Francis; 1994:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Blattner D, Kolb M, Leuenberger H. Percolation theory and compactibility of binary powder systems. Pharm Res 1990;7:113–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuenberger H. The application of percolation theory in powder technology. Adv Powder Technol 1999;10:323–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonny JD, Leuenberger H. Matrix type controlled release systems. II. Percolation effects in non-swellable matrices. Pharm Acta Helvet 1993;68:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Caraballo I, Fernández-Arévalo M, Holgado MA, Rabasco AM. Percolation theory: application to the study of the release behaviour from inert matrix systems. Int J Pharm 1993;96:175–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuenberger H, Bonny JD, Kolb M. Percolation effects in matrix-type controlled drug release systems. Int J Pharm 1995;115:217–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez Hervas MJ, Vela MT, Gonzalez Rodriguez MLG, Rabasco AM. Using the percolation theory to explain the release behavior from inert matrix systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1996;22:201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuertes I, Miranda A, Millan M, Caraballo I. Estimation of the percolation thresholds in acyclovir hydrophilic matrix tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006;64:336–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caraballo I. Factors affecting drug release from hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrix systems in the light of classical and percolation theories. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2010;7:1291–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grund J, Körber M, Bodmeier R. Predictability of drug release from water-insoluble polymeric matrix tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2013;85:650–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersen N, Carvajal MT, Morris KR, et al. The influence of API concentration on the roller compaction process: modeling and prediction of the post compacted ribbon, granule and tablet properties using multivariate data analysis. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2015;41:1470–1478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiman J, Tajarobi F, Gururajan B, et al. Roller compaction of hydrophilic extended release tablets-combined effects of processing variables and drug/matrix former particle size. AAPS PharmSciTech 2015;16:267–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Secreast PJ, Amidon GE. Mechanistic study of the effect of roller compaction and lubricant on tablet mechanical strength. J Pharm Sci 2007;96:1342–1355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell GM, Bunn PJ, Webb C, Hook SCW. On predicting roller milling performance: Part II. The breakage function. Powder Technol 2001;115:243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison RD, Shi F, Whyte R. Modelling of incremental rock breakage by impact – for use in DEM models. Miner Eng 2007;20:303–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwanichol J, Puttipipatkhachorn S, Ingenerf G, Kleinebudde P. Roll compaction/dry granulation: comparison between roll mill and oscillating granulator in dry granulation. Pharm Dev Technol 2012;17:30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retsch. Bedienungsanleitung/Handbuch Korngrößenmesssystem Camsizer® und Camsizer® XT. Retsch Technology GmbH; 2012, Haan (Germany).
   Google Scholar
• Roquette. Pearlitol®, Mannitol for pharmaceutical applications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Farber L, Hapgood KP, Michaels JN, et al. Unified compaction curve model for tensile strength of tablets made by roller compaction and direct compression. Int J Pharm 2008;346:17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguélez-Morán AM, Wu CY, Seville JPK. The effect of lubrication on density distributions of roller compacted ribbons. Int J Pharm 2008;362:52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon O, Guigon P. Correlation between powder-packing properties and roll press compact heterogeneity. Powder Technol 2003;130:257–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim H, Dave VS, Kidder L, et al. Assessment of the critical factors affecting the porosity of roller compacted ribbons and the feasibility of using NIR chemical imaging to evaluate the porosity distribution. Int J Pharm 2011;410:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesarikar VV, Patel C, Early W, et al. Roller compaction process development and scale up using Johanson model calibrated with instrumented roll data. Int J Pharm 2012;436:486–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souihi N, Nilsson D, Josefson M, Trygg J. Near-infrared chemical imaging (NIR-CI) on roll compacted ribbons and tablets – multivariate mapping of physical and chemical properties. Int J Pharm 2015;483:200–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FMC BioPolymer. Binders (Data sheet for Avicel® PH 101); 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sinko CM, Carlson GT, Gierer DS. The identification of percolation and mechanical thresholds during the compaction of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: comparison to thresholds determined from out-of-die indentation experiments. Int J Pharm 1995;114:85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellanos Gil E, Iraizoz Colarte A, Bataille B, et al. Estimation of the percolation thresholds in ternary lobenzarit disodium–dextran–HPMC hydrophilic matrices tablets: effects of initial porosity. Eur J Pharm Sci 2009;38:312–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar