Application of hydrogel polymers for development of thyrotropin releasing hormone-loaded adhesive buccal patches

References

• McElnay JC, Hughes CM. Drug delivery buccal route. In: Swarbrick J, editor. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology: Vol. 1. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2002:800–810.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra AK, Alur HH, Johnston TP. Peptides and proteins-buccal absorption. In: Swarbrick J, editor. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology: Vol. 3. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2002:2081–2095.
   Google Scholar
• Burnette RR, Marrero D. Comparison between the iontophoretic and passive transport of thyrotropin releasing hormone across excised nude mouse skin. J Pharm Sci 1986;75:738–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hypothalamic and pituitary hormones. In: Reynolds JEF, editor. Martindale: The extra pharmacopoeia. London: The Pharmaceutical Press; 1993:962–963.
   Google Scholar
• Rao GN, Sutherland JW, Menon GN. High-performance liquid chromatographic assay for thyrotropin releasing hormone and benzyl alcohol in injectable formulation. Pharm Res 1987;4(1):38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Chou WL, Cheng CH, Yen SC, Jiang TS. The enhanced iontophoretic transport of TRH and its impedance study. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1996;22(9&10):943–950.
   Google Scholar
• Huang YY, Wu SM. Stability of peptides during iontophoretic transdermal delivery. Int J Pharm 1996;131:19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Heya T, Okada H, Tangiawara Y, Ogawa Y, Toguchi H. Effects of counteranion of TRH and loading amount on control of TRH release from copoly (dl-lactic/glycolic acid) microspheres prepared by an in-water drying method. Int J Pharm 1991;69:69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muranishi S, Sakai A, Yamada K, Murakami M, Takada K, Kiso Y. Lipophilic peptides: Synthesis of lauroyl thyrotropin releasing hormone and its biological activity. Pharm Res 1991;8(5):649–652.
   Google Scholar
• Anders R, Merkle HP, Schurr W, Ziegler R. Buccal absorption of protirelin: An effective way to stimulate thyrotropin and prolactin. J Pharm Sci 1983;72:1481–1483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anders R, Merkle HP. Evaluation of laminated mucoadhesive patches for buccal drug delivery. Int J Pharm 1989;49:231–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Bhatt PP, Johnston TP. Transmucosal delivery of oxytocin to rabbits using a mucoadhesive buccal patch. Pharm Dev Technol 1997;2:265–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li C, Koch RL, Raul VA, Bhatt PP, Johnston TP. Absorption of thyrotropin releasing hormone in rats using a mucoadhesive buccal patch. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1997;23:239–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagai T, Machida Y. Buccal delivery systems using hydrogels. Adv Drug Del Rev 1993;11:179–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD, Kellaway IW, Worthington HEC. An in-vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol 1984;36:295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy DS, Rohera BD. Comparative evaluation of rate of hydration and matrix erosion of HEC and HPC and study of drug release from their matrices. Eur J Pharm Sci 2002;16(3):193–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chien YW, Nair M. Mucosal adhesive device for long-acting delivery of pharmaceutical combinations in oral cavity. US Pat No. 5578315, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Smart JD. Recent developments in the use of bioadhesive systems for delivery of drugs to the oral cavity. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 2004;21(4):319–344.
   Google Scholar
• Kellaway IW, Warren SJ. Mucoadhesive hydrogels for buccal delivery. In: Rathbone MJ, editor. Oral mucosal drug delivery. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1996:221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Noveon Inc. Technical Literature 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JW, Park JH, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: The next generation. J Pharm Sci 2000;89(7):850–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H. On the mechanisms of bioadhesion. PhD Thesis Pharm, Madison, WI: School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Barrer RM, Barrie JA, Wong PSL. The diffusion and solution of gases in highly crosslinked copolymers. Polymer 1968;9:609–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Cyr GN.Composition producing adhesion through hydration. In: Manly RS, editor. Adhesive biological systems. New York: Academic Press; 1970:163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Pecosky DA, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive polymers and drug delivery. In: Lenaerts V, Gurny R, editors. Bioadhesive drug delivery systems. Florida: CRC Press; 1990:99–125.
   Google Scholar
• Chickering DE, Mathiowitz E. Definitions, Mechanisms and theories of bioadhesion. In: Mathiowitz E, Chickering DE, Lehr CM, editors. Bioadhesive drug delivery systems: Fundamentals, novel approaches, and development. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1999:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Voyutskii SS. Autohesion and adhesion of high polymers. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Hiemenz PC. The viscous state. In: Hiemenz PS, editor. Polymer chemistry – the basic concepts. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Gurny R, Meyer JM, Peppas NA. Bioadhesive intraoral release systems: Design, testing and analysis. Biomaterials 1984;5:336–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrvold R, Onsøyen E. Alginates, FMC Biopolymer Technical Literature; 2005(16):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gombotz WR, Wee SF. Protein release from alginate matrices. Adv Drug Del Rev 1998;31:267–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla AK, Chawla M, Singh A. Potential applications of carbomer in oral mucoadhesive controlled drug delivery system: A review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2000;26(9):913–924.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed FA, Khedr H. Preparation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation of the buccal bioadhesive properties of slow-release tablets containing miconazole nitrate. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2003;29(3):321–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim SW, Bae YH, Okano T. Hydrogels: Swelling, drug loading, and release. Pharm Res 1992;9(3):283–290.
   Google Scholar
• Using METHOCEL cellulose ethers for controlled release of drugs in hydrophilic matrix systems. Dow Technical Literature; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• METHOCEL Cellulose Ethers Technical Handbook; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Adv Drug Del Rev 2001;48:139–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds TD, Dasbach TP, Rosenberg S. Polymer erosion of hydrophilic matrices, Dow Technical Literature; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds TD, Dasbach TP. A study of polymer blending and polymer erosion of different viscosity grades of hypromellose for hydrophilic matrix tablets. Dow Technical Literature; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Huang X, Brazel CS. On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems. J Control Rel 2001;73:121–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar