Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing

References

• Duffy GP, Prpa B, Rowland CM, Berry DJ. Primary uncemented Harris–Galante acetabular components in patients 50 years old or younger: results at 10 to 12 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 427: 157–161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan JJ, O'Rourke MR, Saleh KJ. Why knees fail: lessons learned. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(4 Suppl. 1)31–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler HP, Reineck FT, Wixson RL, McCarthy JC. Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63(9)1426–1434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr LD. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87-A(3)675
   Google Scholar
• Joshi AB, Porter ML, Trail IA, Hunt LP, Murphy JC, Hardinge K. Long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75(4)616–623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(1)28–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaule PE, Amstutz HC, Le Duff M, Dorey F. Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(8 Suppl. 3)54–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(2)177–184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87(2)167–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 329 Suppl.: S89–S98
   Google Scholar
• Shekhman M, Masri BA, Greidanus NV, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP, Anglin C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen KB. Variability of femoral positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Presentation at 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Washington, DC, February, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Mont MA, Rajadhyaksha AD, Hungerford DS. Outcomes of limited femoral resurfacing arthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(8 Suppl. 1)134–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mont M, Bezweda H, Thomas C, Etienne G. The results of metal on metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: learning curve stratification of results. Presentation at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Washington, DC, February, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Sugano N, Nishii T, Kahahodo K, Sasama T, Sato Y, Tamura S, Sakai KT, Haraguchi K, Nishihara S, Ozono K, Yodenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T (2000) Combined acetabular and femoral navigation for resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress and Exhibition (CARS 2000), San Francisco, CA, 28 June–1 July, 2000, HU Lemke, MW Vannier, K Inamura, AG Farman, K Doi. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 226–230
   Google Scholar
• Zambelli PY, Brégand CH, Dewarrat ST, Marti GS, Baur CH, Leyvarz PF (2003) Planning and navigation solution in resurfacing hip surgery—A way to reduce the surgical approach. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of CAOS-International, MarbellaSpain, June, 2003. Darmstadt, Steinkopff
   Google Scholar
• Wacek G, Boyle D (2003) Techniques of computer-assisted surgery applied to metal on metal hip resurfacing procedures. Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress and Exhibition (CARS 2003), LondonUK, June, 2003, HU Lemke, MW Vannier, K Inamura, AG Farman, KJ Doi, JHC Reiber. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1329
   Google Scholar
• Hess T, Gampe T, Köttgen, Szawlowski B. Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing: methods and first results [In German]. Der Orthopäde 2004; 33(10)1183–1193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett ARW, Cobb JP, Jalopec M, Harris SJ, Rodriguez y Baena FM, Davies BL. The Tubes™ system for minimally invasive computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery. Presentation at 5th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery (CAOS-International), HelsinkiFinland, June, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Harris SJ, Barrett ARW, Jakopec M, Dandachli W, Cobb JP, Davies BL. Computer assisted planning for hip resurfacing replacement surgery. Presentation at 5th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery (CAOS-International), HelsinkiFinland, June, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Long WJ, Rudan J, Ellis RE. Computer aided hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Presentation at 5th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery (CAOS-International), HelsinkiFinland, June, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Muller H, Bracke B, Dick R. Automatic detection of femoral neck axes for hip resurfacing surgeries. Presentation at 5th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery (CAOS-International), HelsinkiFinland, June, 2005
   Google Scholar