Novel patient-specific navigational template for total knee arthroplasty

References

• Rodricks DJ, Patil S, Pulido P, Colwell CW Jr. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty: Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89–A: 89–95
   Google Scholar
• Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 28–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 635–640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihalko WM, Boyle J, Clark LD, Krackow KA. The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 25–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356: 144–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihalko WM, Krackow KA. Difference between extramedullary, intramedullary, and computer-aided surgery tibial alignment techniques for total knee atrthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006; 19: 33–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 2276–2280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T. Interindividual reproducibility in preoperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002; 10: 194–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny JY, Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intraoperative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75: 74–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3: 67–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 416: 177–184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 682–687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 282–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: A randomized, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86–B: 372–377
   Google Scholar
• Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 354: 49–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskin RS. Instrumentation pitfalls: You just can’t go on autopilot!. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18(Suppl 1)18–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novotny J, Gonzalez MH, Amirouche FM, Li YC. Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 641–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, Zimolong A, Kaspers G, Rau G, Staudte HW. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 354: 28–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen BD, Christensen GE, Reinhardt JM, Ryken TC. Rapid prototype patient-specific drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12(5)303–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, Xie L, Guo H, Li DP. A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for placement of C2 laminar screws. Eur Spine J 2009; 18(9)1379–1385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu S, Xu YQ, Lu WW, Ni GX, Li YB, Shi JH, Li DP, Chen GP, Chen YB, Zhang YZ. A novel patient-specific navigational template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Spine 2009; 34(26)E959–E964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leightly R, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg RG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 299: 31–43
   Google Scholar
• Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59–A: 77–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishihara S, Sugano N, Ikai M, Sasama T, Tamura S, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T. Accuracy evaluation of a shape-based navigation system for total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2003; 16: 98–105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis appropriates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356: 111–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olcott CW, Scott RD. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 367: 39–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olcott CW, Scott RD. Determining proper femoral component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2000; 13: 166–168
   Google Scholar
• Hood RW, Vanni M, Insall JN. The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 229: 32–43
   Google Scholar
• Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the antero-posterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee: A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77–A: 1331–1334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhoff DG, Piatt BE, Gnadinger CA, Blaschko RC. Assessing rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 318: 176–181
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritter MA, Fans PM, Keating EM. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 299: 153–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 404: 7–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Okazaki K, Akasaki Y, Iwamoto Y. The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1025–1031
   Google Scholar
• Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell Jr CW. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 321: 106–110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 709–713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C, Ragone V. Computer-assisted technique versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems in total knee replacement: a radiological comparison. Acta Orthop Belg 2005; 71: 703–709
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer-navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in the functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89–B: 477–480
   Google Scholar
• Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 2003; 27: 366–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89–B: 471–476
   Google Scholar
• Casino D, Zaffagnini S, Martelli S, Lopomo N, Bignozzi S, Iacono F, Russo A, Marcacci M. Intraoperative evaluation of total knee replacement: Kinematic assessment with a navigation system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17: 369–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 236–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lionberger R. The attraction of electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation in orthopaedic surgery. Navigation and MIS in Orthopaedic Surgery, JB Stiehl, W Konermann, R Hacker. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg 2006; 44–53
   Google Scholar
• Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 433: 152–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Gunther KP, Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90–B: 1039–1044
   Google Scholar
• Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM, Lotke PA. Determining femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 301–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar