A Minimax Entropy Registration Framework for Patient Setup Verification in Radiotherapy

References

• Bansal R, Staib L, Chen Z, Rangarajan A, Knisely J, Nath R, Duncan J S. (1998) A novel approach for the registration of 2D portal and 3D CT images for treatment setup verification in radiotherapy. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI'98). Proceedings of First International Conference, Cambridge, MA, October, 1998, W M Wells, A Colchester, S Delp. Springer, Berlin, 1075–1086, LNCS 1496
   Google Scholar
• Bansal R, Staib L, et al. A novel approach for the registration of 2D portal and 3D CT images for treatment setup verification in radiotherapy. Technical Report 1998-1. Department of Electrical Engineering and Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University. January, 1998, http://noodle.med.yale.edu/∼bansal/techreps/regis. ps.gz
   Google Scholar
• Berger M, Gerig G. (1998) Motion measurements in low-contrast X-ray imagery. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI'98). Proceedings of First International Conference, Cambridge, MA, October, 1998, W M Wells, A Colchester, S Delp. Springer, Berlin, 832–841, LNCS 1496
   Google Scholar
• Bevensee R M. Maximum entropy solutions to scientific problems. PTR Prentice Hall. 1993
   Google Scholar
• Bijhold J, Gilhuijs K G, van Herk M, Meertens H. Radiation field edge detection in portal images. Phys MedBiol 1991; 36: 1705–1710
   Google Scholar
• Dempster A P, Laird N M, Rubin D B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via EM algorithm. J Royal Statistical Soc Ser B 1977; 39: 1–38
   Google Scholar
• Dong L, Boyer A L. An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1995; 33: 1053–1060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda R O, Hart P E. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. John Wiley & Sons. 1973
   Google Scholar
• Feldmar J, Malandain G, Ayache N, Fernandez-Vidal S, Maurincomme E, Trousset Y. (1997) Matching 3D MR angiography data and 2D X-ray angiograms. Proceedings of First Joint Conference, Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery (CVRMed-MR-CAS'97), Grenoble, France, March, 1997, J Troc-caz, E Grimson, R Mosges. Springer, Berlin, 129–138, LNCS 1205
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch D S, Chaney E L, Boxwala A, McAuliffe M J, Raghavan S, Thall A, Earnhart J R. Core-based portal image registration for automatic radiotherapy treatment verification. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1995; 33: 1287–1300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhuijs K. Automated verification of radiation treatment geometry. Ph.D. thesis. University of Amsterdam, Radiotherapy Department, The Netherlands 1995
   Google Scholar
• Gilhuijs K, Drukker K, Touw A, van de Ven P J, van Herk M. Interactive three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images and computed tomography data. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1996; 34: 873–885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueziec A, Kazanzides P, Williamson B, Taylor R H. Anatomy-based registration of CT-scan and intraop-erative X-ray images for guiding a surgical robot. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1998; 17: 715–728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley J, Mageras G S, Sun J, Kutcher G J. The effects of out-of-plane rotations on two dimensional portal image registration in conformal radiotherapy of the prostate. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1995; 33: 1331–1343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiristov D H, Fallone B G. A gray-level image alignment algorithm for registration of portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs. Med Phys 1996; 23: 75–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubble J H. Photon cross sections, attenuation coefficients, and energy absorption coefficients from 10 KeV to 100 GeV. Nat Stand Ref Data Ser, Nat Bur Stand (US). August, 1969
   Google Scholar
• Jaynes E T. Prior probabilities. ET Jaynes: Papers on probability, statistics and statistical physics, R D Rosenkrantz. D Re-idel Publishing Company, Boston, MA 1983; 158: 114–130
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick S, et al. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983; 220: 671–680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavallée S, Szeliski R, Brunie L. Anatomy-based registration of three-dimensional medical images, range images, X-ray projections, and three-dimensional models using octree-splines. Computer-Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, R H Taylor, S Lavallée, G C Burdea, R Mösges. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1996; 115–143
   Google Scholar
• Lemieux L, Jagoe R, Fish D R, Kitchen N D, Thomas D C. A patient-to-computed-tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs. Med Phys 1994; 21: 1749–1760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski K W, Loose S, Boyko S. An image registration scheme applied to verification of radiation therapy. Br J Radiology 1998; 71: 413–426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meertens H, Bijhold J, Strackee J. A method for the measurement of field displacement errors in digital portal images. Phys Med Biol 1990; 35: 299–323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubata C D, Bidmead A M, Ellingham L M, Thompson V, Deamaley D P. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer. IntJ Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1998; 40: 221–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neve W D, van den Heuvel F, Coghe M, Verellen D, De Beukeleer M, Roelstraete A, De Roover P, Thon L, Storme G. Interactive use of on-line portal imaging in pelvic radiation. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1993; 25: 517–524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sensor Systems, Inc. MEDx™: Multimodality Radiological Image Processing For Unix Workstations. 1998, Version 2.1
   Google Scholar
• Studholme C, et al. Incorporating connected region labeling into automated image registration using mutual information. Proceedings of MMBIA'96. 1996; 23–31
   Google Scholar
• Van den Elsen P A, Viergever M A. Medical image matching—a review with classification. IEEE Eng in Med and Biol 1993; 12: 26–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vemuri B C, et al. An efficient motion estimator with application to medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 1998; 2: 79–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viola P, Wells W M. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision. 1995; 16–23
   Google Scholar
• Weese J, Penney G P, Buzug T M, Fassnacht C, Lorenz C. 2D/3D registration of pre-operative CT images and intra-operative x-ray projections for image guided surgery. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium and Exhibition (CAR'97), H Lerake, M W Vannier, K Inamura. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1997; 833–838
   Google Scholar