Perforating Appendicitis: is it a Separate Disease?

REFERENCES

• Anders son RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJG. Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: associa-tion with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg 1992; 158: 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A, Nystrom PO, Olaison G. Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ 1994; 308: 107–110.
   Google Scholar
• Arnbjörnsson E. Small intestinal obstruction after appendectomy: an unavoidable complication? Curr Surg 1984; 41: 354–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baigrie RJ, Dehn TCB, Fowler SM, Dunn DC. Analysis of 8651 appendicectomies in England and Wales during 1992. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 933.
   Google Scholar
• Bennion RS, Baron EJ, Thompson JE, et al. The bacteriology of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis-revisited. Ann Surg 1990; 211: 165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blind PJ, Dahlgren ST. The continuing challenge of the negative appendix. Acta Chir Scand 1986; 152: 623–627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell KL, DeBeaux AC. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and appendicitis in patients aged over 50 years. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 967–968.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Dombal FT. The diagnosis of acute abdominal pain with computer assistance: worldwide perspective. Ann Chir 1991; 45: 273–277.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon JM. Rectal examination in patients with pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. BMJ 1991; 302: 386–388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durlach V. Livosovski F, Gross A, et al. Appendicec-tomy in an unusual case of lead poisoning. Lancet 1986; ii: 687–688.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson S. Acute appendicitis-ways to improve diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Surg 1996; 162: 435–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. Clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Theor Surg 1992; 7: 81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. Sex specific diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 29: 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Fenyö G. Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults. Acta Chir Scand 1987; 153: 545–551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham DF. Computer-aided prediction of gangrenous and perforating appendicitis. BMJ 1977; 2: 1375–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock DM, Heptinstall M, Old JM, et al. Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. The practical impact of a "theoretical" exercise. Theor Surg 1987; 2: 99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorn IE. Abdominal pain as a cause of acute admission to hospital. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37: 389–393.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann J, Rasmussen OO. Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 774–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homtrich J, Hinkel M, Köhler KM. Klinische Aspekte der Appendicitis. Zentbl Chir 1991; 116: 243–252.
   Google Scholar
• Jess P. Bjerregaard B, Brynitz S, et al. Acute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications. Am J Surg 1981; 141: 232–234.
   Google Scholar
• John H, Neff U, Kelemen M. Appendicitis diagnosis today: clinical and ultrasonic deductions. World J Surg 1993; 17: 243–249.
   Google Scholar
• Kallinowski F, Buhr H. Wertigkeit klinischer, labor-chemischer und sonographischer Befunde bei der akuten Appendicitis- EinfluB der chirurgischen Erfahrung und der bakteriologischen Diagnostik auf die Rate der Wundheilungsstörungen. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1992; 377: 162–167.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson CJ, Swolin K. Postoperative adhesions: etiology, prevention, and therapy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 23: 1213–1220.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert H, Detzner D. Präoperative Untersuchungs-befunde bei Patienten mit einer Appendixperforation. Zentralbl Chir 1986; 111: 801–806.
   Google Scholar
• Luckmann R. Incidence and case fatality rates for acute appendicitis in California. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 905–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man KM, Keeffe EB, Garcia-Kennedy R, Hansen JE, Verhille MS. Acute appendicitis secondary to metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 1966–1968.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler S, Cappell MS, Bhatt B, et al. Appendiceal infection by Entamoeba histolytica and Strongyloides stercoralis presenting like acute appendicitis. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35: 603–608.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nitecki S, Karmeli R, San MG. Appendiceal calculi and fecaliths as indications for appendectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171: 185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Pasurka B, Filler D, Muhrer KH. Der Ileus nach Appendektomie. Akt Chir 1984; 19: 124–127.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper R, Forsell P. Kager L. Perforating appendicitis. A nine-year survey of treatment and results. Acta Chir Scand 1986; 530: 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Primate sta P. Goldacre MJ. Appendicectomy for acute appendicitis and for other conditions: an epidemiologi-cal study. Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen OO, Hoffmann J. Assessment of the reliability of the symptoms and signs of acute appendi-citis. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1991; 36: 372–377.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci MA, Trevisani MF, Beck WC. Acute appendicitis, a 5-year review. Am Surg 1991; 57: 301–305.
   Google Scholar
• Schickedanz H, Giggel S Die Appendizitis-Eine Analyse nach 4000 Fallen. Kinderarzt 1990; 21: 693–696.
   Google Scholar
• Shin MS, Ho KH. Appendicolith. Significance in acute appendicitis and demonstration by computed tomogra-phy. Dig Dis Sci 1985; 30: 184–187.
   Google Scholar
• Temple CL, Hutchcroft SA, Temple WJ. The natural history of appendicitis in adults-a prospective study. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 278–281.
   Google Scholar
• Walker SJ, West R, Colmer MR. Acute appendicitis: does removal of a normal appendix matter, what is the value of diagnostic accuracy and is surgical delay important?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1995; 68: 358–363.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Wen S, Naylor CD. Diagnostic accuracy and short-term surgical outcomes in cases of suspected acute appendicitis. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 152: 1617–1626.
   Google Scholar