Sharing the agenda: pondering the politics and practices of occupational therapy research

References

• Law M. The environment: A focus for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1991;58:171–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollard N, Sakellariou D, Kronenberg F. Preface. In: Pollard N, Sakellariou D, Kronenberg F, editors. A political practice of occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2009. p xvii.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Perspectives on disability and rehabilitation: Contesting assumptions; challenging practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Reflections on … a disability methodology for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy research. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:365–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finlayson M. Developing our science. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:363.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas C. Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. 2nd ed. Ottawa: Author; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Swain J, French S, Cameron C. Controversial issues in a disabling society. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers. Chambers' twentieth century dictionary. Edinburgh: Chambers; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference? Can J Occup Ther 1995;62:250–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Letts L. Occupational therapy and participatory research: A partnership worth pursuing. Am J Occup Ther 2003; 57:77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley M, Waddington L, Bessozi C. New priorities for disability research in Europe: Towards a user-led agenda. ALTER: European J Disabil Res 2010;4:239–55.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley M, Waddington L, Bessozi C. Towards an agenda for disability research in Europe: Learning from disabled people's organisations. Disabil Society 2010;25:731–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White GW, Suchowierska MA, Campbell M Developing and systematically implementing participatory action research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:(4 Suppl. 2):S3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward L, Flynn M. What matters most: Disability, research and empowerment. In: Rioux MH, Bach M, editors. Disability is not measles: New research paradigms in disability. North York, ONT: L'Institut Roeher; 1994. p 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane S. Opening spaces for alternative understandings in mental health practice. In: Allen J, Briskman L, Pease B, editors. Critical social work: Theories and practices for a socially just world. 2nd edn. Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin; 2009. p 201–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ilott I, White E. 2001 College of Occupational Therapists' Research and Development Strategic Vision and Action Plan. Br J Occup Ther 2001;64:270–7.
   Google Scholar
• White GW, Nary DE, Froehlich AK. Consumers as collaborators in research and action. J Prev Interv 2001;21:15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Birch D, Langley J, Langille L. Participatory research in a mental health clubhouse. Occup Ther J Res 2000;20:18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes C, Mercer G, Shakespeare T. Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight J. Professionalised service and disabling help. In: Brechin A, Liddiard P, Swain J, editors. Handicap in a social world. Sevenoaks, UK: Hodder & Stoughton; 1981:24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Basnett I. Health care professionals and their attitudes toward and decisions affecting disabled people. In: Albrecht GL, Seelman KD, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage Publications; 2001. p 450–67.
   Google Scholar
• Glasby J, Beresford P. Who knows best? Evidence-based practice and the service user contribution. Critic Soc Pol 2006;26:268–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodare H, Lockwood S. Involving patients in clinical research: Improves the quality of research. BMJ 1999;319:724–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton DK, Rogers S, Stuifbergen A. Answers to unasked questions: Writing in the margins. Res Nurs Health 1999;22:512–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warms CA, Marshall HM, Hoffman AJ, Tyler EJ. There are a few things you did not ask about my pain: Writing on the margins of a survey questionnaire. Rehabil Nurs 2005;30:248–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW. Psychosocial outcome following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1994;32:771–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW. Psychosocial outcome following severe closed head injury. Int J Rehabil Res 1994;17:319–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhopal K. Gender, “race” and power in the research process. In: Truman C, Mertens D, Humphries B, editors. Research and inequality. London: UCL Press; 2000. p 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hart KA, Rintala DH, Fuhrer MJ. Educational interests of individuals with spinal cord injury living in the community: Medical, sexuality, and wellness topics. Rehabil Nurs 1996;21:82–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fawkes-Kirby TM, Wheeler MA, Anton HA, Miller WC, Townson AF, Weeks CAO. Clinical correlates of fatigue in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46:21–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnartt S, Altman B. Exploring theories and expanding methodologies: Where we are and where we need to go. Res Soc Sci Disabil 2001;2:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Abma TA. Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1310–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone E, Priestley M. Parasites, pawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. Br J Sociol 1996;47:699–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White GW. Consumer participation in disability research: The golden rule as a guide for ethical practice. Rehabil Psychol 2002;47:438–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Focus groups with users and providers of health care. In: Pope C, Mays N, editors. Qualitative research in health care. 2nd ed. London: BMJ; 2000. p 20–9.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage Publications; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J, Barbour RS. Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, editors. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage Publications; 1999. p 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S. How useful are focus groups in feminist research? In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, editors. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage Publications; 1999. p 64–78.
   Google Scholar
• Baker R, Hinton R. Do focus groups facilitate meaningful participation in social research? In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, editors. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage Publications; 1999. p 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW, Miller WC, Forwell SJ, Forman BE, Jacobsen BA. Fatigue and spinal cord injury: A qualitative analysis. Spinal Cord 2009;47:44–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW, Miller WC, Forwell SJ, Forman BE, Jacobsen BA. Managing fatigue following spinal cord injury: A qualitative exploration. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1437–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin R. The researched opinions on research: Disabled people and disability research. Dis Soc 2000;15:25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northway R. Disability, nursing research and the importance of reflexivity. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:391–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnitt R, Partridge C. The legacy of being a research subject: Follow-up studies of participants in therapy research. Physio Res Int 1999;4:250–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hall BL. From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research. Am Sociol 1992;23:15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty CT. Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In: Williams P, Chrisman L, editors. Colonial discourse and postcolonial theory. New York: Columbia University Press; 1994. p 196–220.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Brown M, Gordon WA. Empowerment in measurement: “Muscle”, “voice” and subjective quality of life as a gold standard. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:(4 Suppl 2):S13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke, UK, Macmillan; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn L, Trentham B. Participatory action research: Integrating community occupational therapy practice and research. Can J Occup Ther 2002;69:20–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Said EW. Orientalism, London: Routledge; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Young RJC. Postcolonialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ryen A. Colonial methodology? In: Truman C, Mertens D, Humphries B, editors. Research and inequality. London: UCL Press; 2000. p 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Childs P, Williams P. An introduction to post-colonial theory. London: Prentice-Hall; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ford S, Schofield T, Hope T. What are the ingredients for a successful evidence-based patient choice consultation?: A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:589–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan M, Hanson E, Grant G, Keady J. User participation in health and social care research. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood DJ, Levin M. Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000. p 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull AP, Friesen BJ, Ramirez C. Participatory Action Research as a model for conducting family research. J Assoc Persons Severe Handicaps 1998;23:178–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braye S. Participation and involvement in social care. In: Kemshall H, Littlechild R, editors. User involvement and participation in social care: Research informing practice. London: Jessica Kingsley; 2000. p 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor RR, Braveman B. Hammel J. Developing and evaluating community-based services through participatory action research: Two case examples. Am J Occup Ther 2004;58:73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat JD, Redmond JD, Grabowecky BR. The Winter Walkability project: Occupational therapists' role in promoting citizen engagement. Can J Occup Ther 2010;77:7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebeiro K. How qualitative research can inform and challenge occupational therapy practice. In: Hammell KW, Carpenter C, editors. Qualitative research in evidence-based rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier;2004. p 89–102.
   Google Scholar