Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: Critical reflections

References

• American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:609–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT) & the Health Services Directorate. Guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Ottawa: Health Services Directorate; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• College of Occupational Therapists (COT). Code of ethics and professional conduct for occupational therapists. London: COT; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. 2nd ed. Ottawa: Author; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference? Can J Occup Ther 1995;62:250–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW. Contesting assumptions in occupational therapy. In Curtin M, Molineux M, Supyk-Mellson J, editors. Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: Enabling occupation. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2010. p 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Nixon SA, Nicholls DA. Critical reflections on the physiotherapy profession in Canada. Physiother Can 2010;62:98–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Sacred texts: A sceptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Self-care, productivity and leisure, or dimensions of occupational experience? Rethinking occupational “categories”. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:107–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molke DK, Rudman DL. Governing the majority world? Critical reflections on the role of occupation technology in international contexts. Aust Occup Ther J 2009;56:239–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan EAS, Paley J, Eva G. Complex interventions and complex systems in occupational therapy: An alternative perspective. Br J Occup Ther 2007;70:199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Mocellin G. Occupational therapy: A critical overview, Part 1. Br J Occup Ther 1995;58:502–6.
   Google Scholar
• Eakin J, Robertson A, Poland B, Coburn D, Edwards R. Towards a critical social science perspective on health promotion research. Health Promo Int 1996;11:157–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macey D. The Penguin dictionary of critical theory. London: Penguin; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Leplege A, Gzil F, Cammelli M, Lefeve C, Pachoud B, Ville I. Person-centredness: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1555–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumsion T. A revised occupational therapy definition of client-centred practice. Br J Occup Ther 2000;63:304–9.
   Google Scholar
• Blank A. Clients' experience of partnership with occupational therapists in community mental health. Br J Occup Ther 2004;67:118–24.
   Google Scholar
• Corring DJ. The missing perspective on client-centred care. OT Now 1999;Jan–Feb;8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Perspectives on disability and rehabilitation. Contesting assumptions; challenging practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko H. Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bibyk B, Day DG, Morris L, O'Brien M, Rebeiro KL, Seguin P, Who's in charge here? The client's perspective on client-centred care. OT Now 1999;Sept–Oct;11–12.
   Google Scholar
• French S. Enabling relationships in therapy practice. In Swain J, Clark J, Parry K, French S, Reynolds F, editors. Enabling relationships in health and social care. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004. p 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Mangset M, Dahl TE, Førde R, Wyller TB. “We're just sick people, nothing else”: … factors contributing to elderly stroke patients' satisfaction with rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:825–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis R, Jackson R. Quality of life and quality of service relationships: Experiences of people with disabilities. Dis Soc 2000;15:411–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebeiro K. Client perspectives on occupational therapy practice: Are we truly client-centred? Can J Occup Ther 2000;67:7–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: Client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1411–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack C, Collins B. Can disability studies contribute to client-centred occupational therapy practice? Br J Occup Ther 2010;73:339–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitra KK, Erway F. Perception of client-centred practice in occupational therapists and their clients. Am J Occup Ther 2006;60:298–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Exposing the emperor: Meditations on credulity and occupational therapy. OT Now 2012; 14(6): 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Position statement on client-centredness in occupational therapy. WFOT 2010.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon AL. Client values and satisfaction with occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther 2000;7:99–106.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight J. Professionalised service and disabling help. In Brechin A, Liddiard P, Swain J, editors. Handicap in a social world. Sevenoaks. UK: Hodder & Stoughton; 1981. p 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Abberley P. Disabling ideology in health and welfare: The case of occupational therapy. Dis Soc 1995;10:221–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellberg A, Kåhlin I, Haglund L, Taylor RR. The myth of participation in occupational therapy: Reconceptualizing a client-centred approach. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:421–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FAS, Boland P, Rutherford SJ, Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Implementing a client-centred approach in rehabilitation: An autoethnography. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:997–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmadottir G. Client perspectives on occupational therapy in rehabilitation services. Scand J Occup Ther 2003;10:157–66.
   Google Scholar
• Palmadottir G. Client–therapist relationships: Experiences of occupational therapy clients in rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther 2006;69:394–401.
   Google Scholar
• Abberley P. A critique of professional support and intervention. In Swain J, French S, Barnes C, Thomas C, editors. Disabling barriers – enabling environments. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2004. p 239–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cant R. Rehabilitation following a stroke: A participant perspective. Disabil Rehabil 1997;19:297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corring D, Cook J. Client-centred care means that I am a valued human being. Can J Occup Ther 1999;66:71–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW. Client-centred practice: Ethical obligation or professional obfuscation? Br J Occup Ther 2007;70:264–6.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein V. Modernising services? In Swain J, French S, Barnes C, Thomas C, editors. Disabling barriers – enabling environments. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2004. p 206–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp L. Why are some people's needs unmet? Dis Soc 2002;17:205–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain J, French S, Cameron C. Controversial issues in a disabling society. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Twigg J. Bathing – the body and community care. London: Routledge; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Barbara A, Curtin M. Gatekeepers or advocates? Occupational therapists and equipment funding schemes. Aust Occup Ther J 2008;55:57–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moats G. Discharge decision-making, enabling occupations, and client-centred practice. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:91–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW. The experience of rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord 2007;45:260–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Reflections on … a disability methodology for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy research. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:365–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW, Miller WC, Forwell SJ, Forman BE, Jacobsen BA. Sharing the agenda: Pondering the politics and practices of occupational therapy research. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basnett I. Health care professionals and their attitudes toward and decisions affecting disabled people. In Albrecht GL, Seelman KD, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage Publications; 2001. p 450–67.
   Google Scholar
• Glasby J, Beresford P. Who knows best? Evidence-based practice and the service user contribution. Critic Soc Pol 2006;26:268–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letts L. Occupational therapy and participatory research: A partnership worth pursuing. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Can J Occup Ther 2004;71:296–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suto M. Exploring leisure meanings that inform client-centred practice. In Hammell KW, Carpenter C, editors. Qualitative research in evidence-based rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Awaad T. Culture, cultural competency and occupational therapy: A review of the literature. Br J Occup Ther 2003;66:356–62.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama MK. The Kawa model. Culturally relevant occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson A. Seeing white: A critical exploration of occupational therapy with Indigenous Australian people. Occup Ther Int 2007;14:237–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson A. Learning from the past, looking to the future: Exploring our place with Indigenous Australians. Aust Occup Ther J 2009;56:97–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwama M. Toward culturally relevant epistemologies in occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:582–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW, Iwama MK. Wellbeing and occupational rights: An imperative for critical occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:385–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jull JE, Giles AR. Health equity, Aboriginal peoples and occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 2012;79:70–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach AJ. A critical reflection on the concept of cultural safety. Can J Occup Ther 2012;79:151–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther 2011;74:27–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creek J. Occupational therapy defined as a complex intervention. London: College of Occupational Therapists; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. A Model of Human Occupation: Theory and application. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Borell L, Asaba E, Rosenberg L, Schult M-L, Townsend E. Exploring experiences of “participation” among individuals living with chronic pain. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:76–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doble SE, Caron Santha J. Occupational well-being: Rethinking occupational therapy outcomes. Can J Occup Ther 2008;75:184–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eklund M, Leufstadius C. Relationships between occupational factors and health and well-being in individuals with persistent mental illness living in the community. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:303–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW. Using qualitative evidence to inform theories of occupation. In Hammell KW, Carpenter C, editors. Qualitative research in evidence-based rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson H. A new direction in the conceptualization and categorization of occupation. J Occup Sci 2008;15:3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce D. Occupation by design: Dimensions, therapeutic power, and creative process. Am J Occup Ther 2001;55:249–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen S, Strong J, Polatajko H. Graduate-entry master's degrees: Launchpad for occupational therapy in this millennium? Br J Occup Ther 2001;64:572–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Graduate-entry master's degrees: Benefits to clients? Letter to the editor. Br J Occup Ther 2002;65:37.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 4th ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock N. Client centred assessment. Am J Occup Ther 1993;47:298–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowls J, Hales S. It's the activity that counts: What clients value in psycho-educational groups. Can J Occup Ther 2005;72:176–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher A, Savin-Baden M. The benefits to young people experiencing psychosis, and their families, of an Early Intervention Programme: Evaluating a service from the consumers' and the providers' perspective. Br J Occup Ther 2001;64:58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Gan C, Campbell KA, Snider A, Cohen S, Hubbard J. Giving Youth a Voice (GYV): A measure of youths' perceptions of the client-centredness of rehabilitation services. Can J Occup Ther 2008;75:96–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krupa T, Eastabrook S, Hern L, Lee D, North R, Percy K, How do people who receive assertive treatment experience this service? Psychiatric Rehabil J 2005;29:18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson S, Wiles R. Advantages and disadvantages of the home setting for therapy: Views of patients and therapists. Br J Occup Ther 2000;63:59–64.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson KM, Brander P, Taylor WJ, McNaughton HK. Living with arthritis: What is important? Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:706–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston J, Haslam S, Lamont L. What do people with multiple sclerosis want from an occupational therapy service? Br J Occup Ther 2012;75:264–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott P. Conflict over the grey areas: District nurses and home helps providing community care. J Gender Stud 1994;3:299–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP). Rules of professional conduct. Physiother 1996;81:460.
   Google Scholar
• Copperman J, Morrison P. We thought we knew … involving patients in nursing practice. London: King's Fund Centre; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Stalker K, Jones C. Normalization and critical disability theory. In Jones D, Blair S, Hartery T, Jones R, editors. Sociology and occupational therapy: An integrated approach. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. p 171–83.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E. Good intentions overruled: A critique of empowerment in the routine organization of mental health services. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Coleridge P. Disability, liberation and development. Oxford: Oxfam; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• French S, Swain J. The relationship between disabled people and health and welfare professionals. In Albrecht GL, Seelman KD, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage Publications; 2001. p 734–53.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes C, Mercer G. Disability. Cambridge: Polity; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sumsion T. Facilitating client-centred practice: Insights from clients. Can J Occup Ther 2005;72:13–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollard N, Sakellariou D, Kronenberg F. Preface. In Pollard N, Sakellariou D, Kronenberg F, editors. A political practice of occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2009. p xvii.
   Google Scholar
• Magasi S. Disability studies in practice: A work in progress. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:611–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocellin G. Occupational therapy: A critical overview, Part 2. Br J Occup Ther 1996;59:11–16.
   Google Scholar