Participation in social internet-based activities: Five seniors' intervention processes

References

• White P, Selwyn N. Moving on line? An analysis of patterns of adult internet use in the UK, 2002–2010. Inform Comm Soc 2013;16:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findahl O. Swedes and the internet 2012. Stockholm; 2012. Available from https://www.iis.se/english/reports/.
   Google Scholar
• Verdonck CM, Ryan S. Mainstream technology as an occupational therapy tool: Technophobe or technogeek? Br J Occup Ther 2008;71:253–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne A, Trenwith L, Zubrinich S, Corlis M. “I feel less lonely”: what older people say about participating in a social networking website. Qual Ageing 2010;11:25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Findahl O. Swedes and the internet 2011. Stockholm; 2011. Available from https://www.iis.se/english/reports/.
   Google Scholar
• Blit-Cohen E, Litwin H. Elder participation in cyberspace: A qualitative analysis of Israeli retirees. J Aging Stud 2004;18:385–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sum S, Mathews RM, Pourghasem M, Hughes I. Internet use as a predictor of sense of community in older people. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;12:235–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wellman B, Haase AQ, Witte J, Hampton K. Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation and community commitment. Am Behav Sci 2001;45:436–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zickuhr K, Smith A. Digital differences. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life project: Washington, DC; 2012. Available from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Demoussis M, Giannakopoulos N. Facets of the digital divide in Europe: Determination and extent of internet use. Econ Innovat New Tech 2006;15:235–46.
   Google Scholar
• Zickuhr K, Madden M. Older adults and internet use: For the first time, half of adults ages 65 and older are online. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life project: Washington, DC; 2012. Available from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Older-adults-and-internet-use.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson E, Larsson-Lund M, Nilsson I. Internet based activities (IBAs): Seniors' experiences of the conditions required for the performance of and the influence of these conditions on their own participation in society. Educ Gerontol 2013;39:155–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahm E-S, Preece J, Resnick B, Mills ME. Usability of health web sites for older adults. Comput Inform Nurs 2004;22:326–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin AJ, Maddux CD. Accessibility accomodations for older adults seeking e-health information. J Gerontol Nurs 2007;6–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:640–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: Theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar SS, Oeldorf-Hirsch A, Nussbaum FJ, Behr AR. Retirees on Facebook: Can online social networking enhance their health and wellness? Proceedings of the CHI 2011 conference; Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011. p 2287–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hogeboom LD, McDermott JR, Perrin MK, Osman H. Internet use and social networking among middle aged and older adults. Educ Gerontol 2010;36:93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke CM, Freddolino PP, Mullen EE. Ageing and technology: A review of the research literature. Br J Soc Work 2009;39:641–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fänge A, Ivanoff-Dahlin S. Integrating research into practice: A challenge for local authority occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther 2009;16:40–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay RA. Interventions to reduce social isolation amongst older people: Where is the evidence? Ageing Soc 2003;23:647–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattan M, White M, Bond J, Learmouth A. Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: A systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing Soc 2005;25:41–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell WK. Using qualitative research to inform the client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther 2001;64:228–34.
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fischl C, Fisher AG. Development and Rasch analysis of the Assessment of Computer-Related Skills. Scand J Occup Ther 2007;14:126–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson E, Nilsson I. Social Network Online & Offline: Self-evaluation tool. 2010 [ Unpublished material].
   Google Scholar
• Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess 1996;66:20–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry G. Loneliness and coping among tertiary level adult cancer patients in the home. Cancer Nurs 1990;13:293–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiresuk JT, Sherman ER. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J 1968;4:443–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M-A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 4th ed. Toronto: CAOT Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Samuelsson K, Henriksson C. Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scand J Occup Ther 1999;6:84–9.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson PM, Sandqvist G, Sturesson A-L, Gulfe A, Kopylov P, Tägil M, et al. Individualized outcome measures of daily activities are sensitive tools for evaluating hand surgery in rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology 2012;53:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 2nd ed. Toronto: CAOT Publications ACE; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Occupational therapy intervention process model: A model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centered and occupation based interventions. Fort Collins: Three Star Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Svedhem L. Nätverksterapi: teori och praktik [Network therapy: theory and practice]. Sweden: Carlssons; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman EC. Humanistic inquiry in marketing research: Philosophy, method, and criteria. J Market Res 1986;23:237–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christofides E, Muise A, Desmarais S. Hey mom, what's on your Facebook? Comparing Facebook disclosure and privacy in adolescents and adults. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2012;3:48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd D. Facebook's privacy trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence 2008;14:13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rui R, Jian Stefanone M. Strategic image management online. Inform Comm Soc 2013;1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson Jr, NR. Social isolation in older adults: An evolutionary concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:1342–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res 1999;34:1209–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AA, Foreit JR. Designing HIV/AIDS intervention studies: An operations research handbook. Washington, DC: Population Council; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart I, McCutcheon D, Handfield R, McLachlin R, Samson D. Effective case research in operations management: A process perspective. J Oper Manag 2002;20:419–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riege AM. Validity and reliability tests in case study research: A literature review with “hands-on” applications for each research phase. Qual Market Res Int J 2003;6:75–86.
   Google Scholar