References
- GKielhofner. A model of human occupation: Theory and practice. Maryland: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
- PLEmiliani. Assistive Technology (AT) versus Mainstream Technology (MST): The research perspective. Technol Disabil 2006;18:19–29.
- A-HPatomella, AKottorp, LNygård. Design and management features of everyday technology that challenge older adults. Br J Occup Ther 2013;76:390–8.
- CMalinowsky, OAlmkvist, AKottorp, LNygard. Ability to manage everyday technology: A comparison of persons with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and older adults without cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:462–9.
- LNygard, MPantzar, BUppgard, AKottorp. Detection of activity limitations in older adults with MCI or Alzheimer’s disease through evaluation of perceived difficulty in use of everyday technology: A replication study. Aging Ment Health 2012;16:361–71.
- LRosenberg, AKottorp, BWinblad, LNygard. Perceived difficulty in everyday technology use among older adults with or without cognitive deficits. Scand J Occup Ther 2009;16:216–26.
- LNygård, AKottorp. Engagement in IADLs, social activities and use of everyday technology in older adults with and without cognitive imapirment. Br J Occup Ther; Accepted.
- AGFisher. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills Volume 1: Development, standardization and administration manual. 7th ed. Forth Collins, CO: Three Star Press; 2012.
- BJKelley, RCPetersen. Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurol Clin 2007;25:577–609.
- HMArrighi, IGélinas, TPMcLaughlin, JBuchanan, SGauthier. Longitudinal changes in functional disability in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Int Psychogeriatr 2013;25:929–37.
- GHSuh, YSJu, BKYeon, AShah. A longitudinal study of Alzheimer’s disease: Rates of cognitive and functional decline. Int J Geriatr Psych 2004;19:817–24.
- BWinblad, KPalmer, MKivipelto, VJelic, LFratiglioni, LOWahlund, et al. Mild cognitive impairment – beyond controversies, towards a consensus: Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med 2004;256:240–6.
- MSAlbert, STDeKosky, DDickson, BDubois, HHFeldman, NCFox, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dementia 2011;7:270–9.
- AWard, HMArrighi, SMichels, JMCedarbaum. Mild cognitive impairment: Disparity of incidence and prevalence estimates. Alzheimer’s Dement 2012;8:14–21.
- AJMitchell, MShiri-Feshki. Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia: Meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009;119:252–65.
- GAMarshall, REAmariglio, RASperling, DMRentz. Activities of daily living: Where do they fit in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease? Neurodegener Dis Manag 2012;2:483–91.
- AKottorp, LNygard. Development of a short-form assessment for detection of subtle activity limitations: Can use of everyday technology distinguish between MCI and Alzheimer’s disease? Expert Rev Neurother 2011;11:647–55.
- GMcKhann, DDrachman, MFolstein, RKatzman, DPrice, EMStadlan. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984;34:939–44.
- RCPetersen. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med 2004;256:183–94.
- LNygård. The meaning of everyday technology as experienced by people with dementia who live alone. Dementia 2008;7:481–502.
- LNygård. Manual to the questionnaire about everyday technology in home and society: Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ II) & Short ETUQ (S-ETUQ). Stockholm Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy; 2012.
- LRosenberg, LNygård, AKottorp. Everyday technology use questionnaire: Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of competence in technology use. OTJR: Occup. Particip Health 2009;29:52.
- FOakley, LDuran, AFisher, BMerritt. Differences in activities of daily living motor skills of persons with and without Alzheimer’s disease. Aust Occup Ther J 2003;50:72–8.
- FOakley, TSunderland. Assessment of motor and process skills as a measure of IADL functioning in pharmacologic studies of people with Alzheimer’s disease: A pilot study. Int Psychogeriatr 1997;9:197–206.
- MLHartman, AGFisher, LDuran. Assessment of functional ability of people with Alzheimer’s disease. Scand J Occup Ther 1999;6:111–18.
- LRosenberg. Navigating through technological landscapes: Views of people with dementia or MCI and their significant others. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2009.
- JMLinacre. WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program. Chicago: Winsteps; 2006.
- STFarias, DMungas, WJagust. Degree of discrepancy between self and other‐reported everyday functioning by cognitive status: Dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy elders. Int J Geriatr Psych 2005;20:827–34.
- CMalinowsky. Managing technology in everyday activities: A study of older adults with dementia, MCI, and no cognitive impairment. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2011.
- CMalinowsky, LNygard, AKottorp. Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of the ability to manage technology in everyday life. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:26–35.
- KRockwood. The measuring, meaning and importance of activities of daily living (ADLs) as an outcome. Int Psychogeriatr 2007;19:467–82.