Occupational science: An important contributor to occupational therapists’ clinical reasoning

References

• Mattingly C, Fleming M. Clinical reasoning. Forms of Inquiry in a Therapeutic Practice. F. A. Davis Company, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Conceptual Foundations of Occupational Therapy. 4th edition, Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling Occupation II. Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision for Health, Well-being, & Justice through Occupation. CAOT Publications ACE. 2007
   Google Scholar
• Upshur REG, Van Den Kerkhof EG, Goel V. Meaning and measurement: An inclusive model of evidence in health care. J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7:91–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A, Harvey G, Kitson A, McCormack B. What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice?. J Adv Nurs 2004;47:81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes R, Richardson WS. (2000) Evidence based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Egan M, Dubouloz CJ, von Zweck C, Vallerand J. The client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998;65:136–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Using qualitative research to inform the client-centred evidence-based practice of occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2001;64:228–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rappolt S. The role of professional expertise in evidence-based occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2003;57;589–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagon, C, Bellin, W, Boniface, G. Reconfiguring evidence-based practice for occupational therapists. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 2008;15:428–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes RL. Evidence-based occupational therapy needs strategically-targeted quality research now. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 2000;47:186–90.
   Google Scholar
• Tickle-Degnen L, Bedell Client-centred practice, therapeutic relationship, and the use of research evidence. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2002;56:470–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuntland H. Hvordan bli en kunnskapsbasert yrkesutøver. Ergoterapeuten 2008;1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cusick A, McCluskey A. Becoming an evidence-based practitioner through professional development. Aust Occup Ther J 2000;47:159–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen HK, Borg T, Hounsgaard L. Aspects affecting occupational therapists' reasoning when implementing research-based evidence in stroke rehabilitation. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:118–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerxa EJ, Clark F, Frank G, Jackson J. An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occup Ther Health Care 1990;6:1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonsson H. A New Direction in the Conceptualization and Categorization of Occupation. Journal of Occupational Science 2008;15:3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Occupational science: A stock take of accumulated insights. J Occup Sci 2000;7:58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie V, Cutchin MP, Humphry R. Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. J Occup Sci 2006;13:83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Leclair LL. Re-examining concepts of occupation and occupation-based models: Occupational therapy and community development. Can J Occup Ther 2010;77:15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman DL, Dennhardt S. Shaping knowledge regarding occupation: Examining the cultural underpinnings of the evolving concept of occupational identity. Aust Occup Ther J 2008;55:153–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Sacred texts: A sceptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Can J Occup Ther; 2009;76:6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting occupational science ontological assumptions. In: Whiteford GE, Hocking C, eds. Occupational Science. Society, Inclusion, Participation Wiley-Blackwell. 2012;54–66.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard N, Sakellariou D, Lawson-Porter A. Will occupational science facilitate or divide the practice of occupational therapy?. Int J Ther Rehabil 2010;17:40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bendixen HJ, Nielsen LM. Aktivitetsvidenskab. In: Brandt, Å, Madsen AJ, Peoples H, eds. Basisbog i ergoterapi. 3. udgave. København:Munksgaard; 2013;411–26.
   Google Scholar
• Chapparo C, Ranka J. Clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N, eds. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Third Edition, Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta J, Taff SD. The illusion of client-centred practice. Scand J Occup Ther 2015;12:1–8. (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Scholarship and practice: Bridging the divide. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:231–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly C, Fleming M, Gilette N. Narrative explorations in the tacit dimension: Bringing language to clinical practice. Nordiske Udkast 1997;1:65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Wilcock A. Occupational justice. In: Christiansen C, Townsend E, eds. Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford G. Knowledge, power, evidence: A critical analysis of key issues in evidence based practice”. I: Whiteford G, Wright-St Clair V, eds. Occupation & Practice in Context. Sydney: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2004;34–50.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce D. Promise. J Occup Sci 2012;19:298–311.
   Google Scholar
• Ikiugu MN, Pollard N. Meaningful Living across the Lifespan: Occupation-based intervention strategies for occupational therapists and scientists. Critical Studies in Occupational Therapy & Occupational Science. Whiting & Birk Ltd. 2015.
   Google Scholar