Achieving teamwork in stroke units: The contribution of opportunistic dialogue

References

• Adams, T. L. (2004). Inter-professional conflict and professionalisation: Dentistry and dental hygiene in Ontario. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 2243–2252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, P. A., Adler, P. (1998). Observational techniques. In: N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. ( pp. 79–110). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, M. J., Latchaw, R. E., Selman, W. R., Shepherd, T., Hadley, M. N., Brass, L. M., et al (2005). Recommendations for Comprehensive Stroke Centers. A consensus statement from the Brain Attack Coalition. Stroke [Online] DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000170622.07210.b4. Accessed 1 May 2009 from: http://stroke.ahajournals.org
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D., Griffiths, L., Lyne, P. (2004). Understanding complex trajectories in health and social care provision. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26(7), 1008–1030.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atwal, A., Caldwell, K. (2005). Do all health and social care professionals interact equally: A study of interactions in multidisciplinary teams in the United Kingdom. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(3), 268–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barr, H. (2003). Unpacking interprofessional education. In: A. Leathard (Ed.) Interprofessional collaboration: From policy to practice in health and social care. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barreca, S., Wilkins, S. (2008). Experiences of nurses working in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63(1), 36–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baxter, S. K., Brumfitt, S. M. (2008). Benefits and losses: A qualitative study exploring healthcare staff perceptions of teamworking. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 17, 127–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. In L. Nichol (Ed.), On dialogue. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borrill, C. S., Carletta, J., Carter, A. J., Dawson, J. F., Garrod, S., Rees, A., Richards, A., Shapiro, D., West, M. A. (2003). Teamworking and effectiveness in health care. Birmingham: Aston Centre for Health Services Research, University of Aston.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P., Bowling, A. (1990). Quality of everyday life in long stay institutions for the elderly. Social Science and Medicine, 30(11), 1201–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. J. (2007). Achieving teamwork: A grounded theory investigation in selected stroke units in the North of England. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cott, C. (1999). Structure and meaning in multidisciplinary teamwork. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20(6), 848–873.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2001). National service framework for older people. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2005). National service framework for long term conditions. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2007). National stroke strategy. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. P., Schmitt, M. H., Heineman, G. D. (2001). Informal roles and the stages of interdisciplinary team development. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(3), 282–229.
   Google Scholar
• Friedson, E. (1994). Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophecy and policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, B. (1999). An investigation of interprofessional collaboration in stroke rehabilitation team conferences. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8, 246–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2002). Interprofessionality in health and social care: The Achilles' heel of partnership? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16(1), 7–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2007). Pessimism and optimism in interprofessional working: The Sedgefield Integrated Team. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(1), 3–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsay, P., Bayley, M., Hellings, C., Hill, M., Woodbury, E., Phillips, S. (2008). Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 179(12), S1–20.
   Google Scholar
• McCallin, A. M. (2004). Pluralistic dialoguing: A theory of interdisciplinary teamwork. The Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, 4(1), 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mickan, S., Rodger, S. (2000). Characteristics of effective teams. Australian Health Review, 23(3), 201–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myco, F. (1984) Stroke and its rehabilitation: The perceived role of the nurse in medical and nursing literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 9, 429–439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation (2005). Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Opie, A. (2000). Thinking teams/thinking clients: Knowledge based teamwork. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pound, P., Sabin, C., Ebrahim, S. (1999). Observing the process of care: A stroke unit, elderly care unit and general medical ward compared. Age and Ageing, 28, 433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. (2008). A nursing perspective on the relationship between nursing and allied health in inpatient rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(4), 314–322.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians (2004) National clinical guidelines for stroke, 2nd edition. Prepared by the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. London: Royal College of Physicians.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians (2008). Summary report on the National Sentinel Stroke Audit. London: Royal College of Physicians.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(2), 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. H. (2001). Collaboration improves the quality of care: Methodological challenges and evidence from US health care research. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(1), 47–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheehan, D., Robertson, L., Ormond, T. (2007). Comparison of language used and patterns of communication in interprofessional and multidisciplinary teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(1), 17–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration (2007). Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3. CD000197.
   Google Scholar
• Suddick, K. M., De Souza, L. H. (2007). Therapists experiences and perceptions of teamwork in neurological rehabilitation: Critical happenings in effective and ineffective teamwork. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(6), 669–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization (2006). Working together for health: The World Health Organisation Report 2006. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar