Acceptability of intrauterine contraception among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a randomised clinical trial

References

• UNAIDS. Global report. UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013 [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jun 25]. Available from: www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/epidemiology/2013/gr2013/UNAIDS_Global_Report_2013_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. The gap report, 2014 [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jun 24]. Available from: www.unaids.org/en/resources/campaigns/2014gapreport
   Google Scholar
• Mugo NR, Heffron R, Donnell D, et al. Increased risk of HIV-1 transmission in pregnancy: a prospective study among African HIV-1-Serodiscordant couples. AIDS 2011;25:1887–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray RH, Li X, Kigozi G, et al. Increased risk of incident HIV during pregnancy in Rakai, Uganda: a prospective study. Lancet 2005;366:1182–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy SI, Buzdugan R, Ralph LJ, et al. Unmet need for family planning, contraceptive failure, and unintended pregnancy among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women in Zimbabwe. PLoS One 2014;e105320.
   Google Scholar
• Hubacher D, Mavranezouli I, McGinn E. Unintended pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: magnitude of the problem and potential role of contraceptive implants to alleviate it. Contraception 2008;78:73–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahy M, Stover J, Kiragu K, et al. What will it take to achieve virtual elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV? An assessment of current progress and future needs. Sex Transm Infect 2010;86(Suppl. 2):ii48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayford SR, Agadjanian V, Luz L. Now or never: perceived HIV status and fertility intentions in rural Mozambique. Stud Fam Plann 2012;43:191–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World contraceptive use 2011 [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 7]. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/contraceptive2011.htm
   Google Scholar
• Heikinheimo O, Lehtovirta P, Aho I, et al. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women: a 5-year follow-up study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:126.e1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikinheimo O, Lehtovirta P, Suni J, et al. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in HIV-infected women – effects on bleeding patterns, ovarian function and genital shedding of HIV. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2857–2861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2004;70:89–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Lalla AM, Doan QV, et al. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 2009;79:5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uganda Bureau of Statistics and ICF International, 2012. Uganda demographic and health survey 2011 [Internet]. [cited 2014 Jul 24]. Available from: www.ubos.org/onlinefiles/uploads/ubos/UDHS/UDHS2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy and abortion in Uganda. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Institute) 2013;2:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kisakye P, Akena WO, Kikampikaho G, et al. Factors associated with conception among a sample of HIV-positive women at a hospital in Uganda. Afr J AIDS Res 2009;8:255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaida A, Matthews LT, Kanters S, et al. Incidence and predictors of pregnancy among a cohort of HIV-positive women initiating antiretroviral therapy in Mbarara, Uganda. PLoS One 2013;8:e63411.
   Google Scholar
• UNAIDS. 2014 Progress report on the Global Plan towards the elimination of new HIV infections among children by 2015 and keeping their mothers alive [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jul 24]. Available from: www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/documents/JC2681_2014-Global-Plan-progress_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oddens BJ. Women’s satisfaction with birth control: a population survey of physical and psychological effects of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, condoms, natural family planning, and sterilization among 1466 women. Contraception 1999;59:277–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkatz RB, Plagianos M, Hoskin E, et al. Acceptability of the Nestorone®/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring: Development of a model; implications for introduction. Contraception 2014;90:514–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasier AF, Smith KB, van der Spuy ZM, et al. Amenorrhea associated with contraception—an international study on acceptability Contraception 2003;67:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. Geneva: WHO 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health. Sexually transmitted infections. Treatment guidelines for use by operational level health workers in Uganda, 2003 [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jul 24]. Available from: aim.jsi.com/Docs/sti_treatment_guideline_hcp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Diaz J, Bahamondes L, Monteiro I, et al. Acceptability and performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in Campinas, Brazil. Contraception 2000;62:59–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1105–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse J, Chipato T, Blanchard K, et al. Provision of long-acting reversible contraception in HIV-prevalent countries: results from nationally representative surveys in southern Africa. BJOG 2013;120:1386–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaida A, Laher F, Strathdee SA, et al. Contraceptive use and method preference among women in Soweto, South Africa: the influence of expanding access to HIV care and treatment services. PloS One 2010;5:e13868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalwadda G, Mirembe F, Byamugisha J, et al. Persistent high fertility in Uganda: young people recount obstacles and enabling factors to use of contraceptives. BMC Public Health 2010;10:530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari R, Kay VJ. Compliance and user satisfaction with the intra-uterine contraceptive device in family planning service: The results of a survey in Fife, Scotland, August 2004. Eur J Contracep Reproduct Health Care 2006;11:28–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhonen S, Haukkamaa M, Jakobsson T, et al. Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study. Contraception 2004;69:407V12.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad L, Wall KM, Vwalika B, et al. Contraceptive discontinuation and switching among couples receiving integrated HIV and family planning services in Lusaka, Zambia. AIDS 2013;27(Suppl. 1):S93–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enzlin P, Weyers S, Janssens D, et al. Sexual functioning in women using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems as compared to copper intrauterine devices. J Sex Med 2012;9:1065–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severy LJ, Newcomer S. Critical issues in contraceptive and STI acceptability. Res J Social Issues 2005;61:45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JA, Davis AR. Contraceptive sex acceptability: a commentary, synopsis and agenda for future research. Contraception 2014;90:4–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrzypulec V, Drosdzol A. Evaluation of quality of life and sexual functioning of women using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive system – Mirena. Coll Antropol 2008;32:1059–1068.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorgen H, Api M, Akca A, et al. Use of the levonorgestrel-IUS in the treatment of menorrhagia: assessment of quality of life in Turkish users. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;279:835–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewies AA. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system – the discontinuing story. Gynecolog Endocrinol 2009;25:668–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry SH, Swamy P, Preidis GA, et al. Implementing the Jadelle implant for women living with HIV in a resource-limited setting: concerns for drug interactions leading to unintended pregnancies. AIDS 2014;28:791–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JA, Jamshidi R, Burke AE. Contraception for the HIV-positive woman: a review of interactions between hormonal contraception and antiretroviral therapy. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2012;2012:890160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heffron R, Donnell D, Rees H, et al. Use of hormonal contraceptives and risk of HIV-1 transmission: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2012;12:19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison CS, Chen PL, Kwok C, et al. Hormonal contraception and the risk of HIV acquisition: an individual participant data metaanalysis. PLoS medicine 2015;12:e1001778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachanas P, Medley A, Pals S, et al. Disclosure, knowledge of partner status, and condom use among HIV-positive patients attending clinical care in Tanzania, Kenya, and Namibia. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2013;27:425–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawani LO, Onyebuchi AK, Iyoke CA. Dual method use for protection of pregnancy and disease prevention among HIV-infected women in South East Nigeria. BMC Women Health 2014;14:39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heys J, Kipp W, Jhangri GS, et al. Fertility desires and infection with the HIV: results from a survey in rural Uganda. AIDS 2009;23(Suppl. 1):S37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar