Staff members' understandings about communication with individuals who have multiple learning disabilities: A case of Finnish OIVA communication training

References

• Ager, A., O'May, F. (2001). Issues in the definition and implementation of “best practice” for staff delivery of interventions for challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 26, 243– 256. doi: 10.1080/13668250120063412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M., Stayton, D. J. (1974). Infant–mother attachment and social development: ‘Socialisation’ as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. Richards, M. P. M. The integration of a child into a social world London, UK: Cambridge University Press. 99– 135.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, C. F., Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Clement, T., Mansell, J., Beadle-Brown, J. (2009). ‘It's pretty hard with our ones, they can't talk, the more able bodied can participate’: Staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 363– 376. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01154.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., West, D., Iacono, T. A. (2003). PICTURE IT: An evaluation of a training program for carers of adults with severe and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 28, 260– 282. doi: 10.1080/1366825031000150964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. I: Attachment. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. (2001). Complexity of staff communication and reported level of understanding skills in adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 233– 243. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00318.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burakoff, K., Launonen, K. (2002, August). Conversations of three interaction pairs using alternative communication Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Odense, Denmark
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, C. (1988). A review of staff training: The emperor's old clothes. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 309– 323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, R. (2002). Nonverbal narratives: Listening to people with severe intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27, 239– 249. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.27.4.239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D. L. (1994). Is communication really the point?: Some thoughts on communication and membership. Mental Retardation, 32, 7– 18. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firth, G., Elford, H., Leeming, C., Crabbe, M. (2008). Intensive interaction as a novel approach in social care: Care staff's views on the practice change process. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21, 58– 69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, S., Iacono, T. (2008). Disability support workers' experience of interaction with a person with profound intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33, 137– 147. doi: 10.1080/13668250802094216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukkink, R. G. (2008). Video feedback in widescreen: A meta-analysis of family programs. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 904– 916. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, A., Rikberg Smyly, S. (1997). How do we stop ‘doing’ and start listening: Responding to the emotional needs of people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 26– 30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.1997.tb00005.x.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, J., Reese, M. (1996). Focus on communication: Improving interaction between staff and residents who have severe or profound mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 363– 382. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(96)00022-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., Olsson, C. (1998). Familjen och habiliteringen. Stockholm, Sweden: Stiftelsen ala. [The family and the habilitation.]
   Google Scholar
• Hilden, S., Merikoski, H., Launonen, K. (2001). Yhteisöpohjainen kuntoutus. Launonen, K. Lehtihalmes, M. Lapsen kielen käytön kehitys ja sen ongelmat – pragmaattinen näkökulma [The development of child language usage and its problems – pragmatic view]. Helsinki, Finland: Publications of the Finnish Logopedics and Phoniatrics Association, 33. 113– 119.
   Google Scholar
• Hile, M. G., Walbran, B. B. (1991). Observing staff-resident interactions: What staff do, what residents receive. Mental Retardation, 29, 35– 41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Labour Organization, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, and the World Health Organization. (2004). CBR: A strategy for rehabilitation equalization of opportunities, poverty reduction and social inclusion of people with disabilities. Joint position paper 2004. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Katajainen, A., Lipponen, K., Litovaara, A. (2008). Voimaa! Oman tarinani mahdollisuudet. Helsinki, Finland: Kustannus Oy Duodecim. [Power! The possibilities of my own story.]
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, E., Buys, N., & Larner, J. (2000). Community-based service delivery in rehabilitation: The promise and the paradox. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22, 435– 445. doi: 10.1080/09638280050045901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H., & Sked, H. (2008). Video interaction guidance: A bridge to better interactions for individuals with communication impairments Zeedyk, M. S. Promoting social interaction for individuals with communicative impairments: Making contact. London: Jessica Kingsley. 139– 154.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerkvist, B. (1992). Community-based rehabilitation: Outcome for the disabled in the Philippines and Zimbabwe. Disability and Rehabilitation, 14, 44– 50. doi: 10.3109/09638289209166427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343– 356. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launonen, K. (2002, August). The use of augmentative and alternative communication in Finnish communities Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Odense, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Dattilo, J., English, J., Gutierrez, L., Hartz, J. (1992). Instructing facilitators to support the communication of people who use augmentative communication systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 865– 875.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maes, B., Lambrechts, G., Hostyn, I., & Petry, K. (2007). Quality-enhancing interventions for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A review of the empirical research literature. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32, 163– 178. doi: 10.1080/13668250701549427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13, 522– 525. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martikainen, K., Burakoff, K. (2006, July). Using video as an instrument when promoting communication Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Düsseldorf, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Martikainen, K., Burakoff, K., Vuoti, K., Launonen, K. (2008, August). Guiding interaction partners on the way to successful interaction Proceedings of the 13th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Montreal, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Martikainen, K., Roisko, E. (2004, October). Interactive skills of personnel and communication partners with intellectual disability Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Natal, Brazil
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370– 396. doi: 10.1037/h0054346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, R., Morris, I., Purcell, M. (1999). Communication between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 194– 205. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1999.00191.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, J. E., McLean, L. K. S., Brady, N. C., Etter, R. (1991). Communication profiles of two types of gesture using nonverbal persons with severe to profound mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 294– 308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McVilly, K. R. (1997). Residential staff: How they view their training and professional support. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 18– 25. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.1997.tb00004.x.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, S., Aitken, S. (2003). Personal communication passports: Guidelines for good practice. Edinburgh, UK: CALL Centre, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., Mathy-Laikko, P. (1989). Augmentative and alternative communication applications for persons with severe congenital communication disorders: An introduction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 3– 13. doi: 10.1080/07434618912331274916.
   Google Scholar
• Nafstad, A., Rødbroe, I. (1999). Co-creating communication: Perspectives on diagnostic education for individuals who are congenitally deafblind and individuals whose impairments may have similar effects. Dronninglund, Denmark: Forlaget-Nord Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M., Hewett, D. (2005). Access to communication: Developing the basics of communication with people with severe intellectual difficulties through intensive interaction. 2nd ed. London, UK: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, K. (2005). Ethnographic methods. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M., McConkey, R., Morris, I. (2000). Notes and discussion. Staff communication with people with intellectual disabilities: The impact of a work-based training programme. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35, 147– 158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter, I. D. (2000). Allow me! A guide to promoting communication skills in adults with developmental delays. Toronto, Canada: The Hanen Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Dunworth, F. (2003). Qualitative methodology Valsiner, J. Connolly, K. J. The handbook of developmental psychology. London, UK: Sage. 603– 621.
   Google Scholar
• Sollied, S., Harmon, T. (2002, August). Qualitative and quantitative video analysis as a tool in parental guidance Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Odense, Denmark
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237– 246. doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations
   Google Scholar
• Von Tetzchner, S., & Jensen, K. (1999). Interacting with people who have severe communication problems: Ethical considerations. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46, 453– 462. doi: 10.1080/103491299100434.
   Google Scholar
• Vuoti, K., Burakoff, K., Martikainen, K. (2009). Jokainen hetki on mahdollisuus: Tutkimus OIVA-hankkeen yhteisöllisen työskentelytavan vaikutuksista. Helsinki: Communication and Technology Centre Tikoteekki and Finnish Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. [Every situation is a possibility: A report of the effects of a communication training framework used in the OIVA project]
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J. (2004). Ascertaining the views of people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 175– 179. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00316.x.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar