Normalisation and its discontents: Continuing conceptual confusion over theory/praxis issues regarding the empowerment of people with intellectual disability

References

• Altermark, N. (2014). The ideology of neuroscience and intellectual disability: Reconstituting the ‘disordered’ brain. Disability & Society, 29, 1460–1472. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.953244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boghossian, P. (2006). Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287185.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brock, S., & Mares, E. (2007). Realism and antirealism. Chesham, UK: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. (2008). Social selves: Theories of self and society (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. A. K. (2008). Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disability & Society, 23, 151–162. doi:10.1080/09687590701841190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230245181
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2012). Stalking ableism: Using disability to expose ‘abled’ narcissism. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (pp. 212–230). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. (1995). Down's syndrome: Children growing up. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511581779
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, A. (1997). From normalisation to where?. In L. Barton & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disability studies: Past, present and future (pp. 45–62). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, A. L. (1992). Towards a sociological critique of the normalisation principle. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, 35–51. doi:10.1080/02674649266780041
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2007). On language. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2012). Nationalism, ethnicity and the state: Making and breaking nations. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Culham, A., & Nind, M. (2003). Deconstructing normalisation: Clearing the way for inclusion. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 28, 65–78. doi:10.1080/1366825031000086902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashtipour, P. (2012). Social identity in question: Construction, subjectivity and critique. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, R. J., & Lemay, R. A. (1999). Normalization and social role valorization at a quarter-century: Evolution, impact, and renewal. In R. J. Flynn & R. A. Lemay (Eds.), A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact (pp. 3–16). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas & The Frankfurt school. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2011). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., & Rapley, M. (2002). Changing the subject: Postmodernity and people with learning difficulties. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 127–142). London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harpur, P. (2012). From disability to ability: Changing the phrasing of the debate. Disability & Society, 27, 325–337. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.654985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, S. R. C. (2004). Explaining postmodernism: Skepticism and socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Tempe, AZ: Scholargy.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Smith, J. R., & Begg, D. (2007). Effects of norms among those with moral conviction: Counter-conformity emerges on intentions but not behaviors. Social Influence, 2, 244–268. doi:10.1080/15534510701476500
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2008). Social identity (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kukla, A. (2000). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, R. (2004). The Down's syndrome handbook: A practical guide for parents and carers. London, UK: Vermilion.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1999). Capitalism, disability and ideology: A materialist critique of the normalization principle. In R. J. Flynn & R. A. Lemay (Eds.), A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact (pp. 163–177). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, B., & Nirje, B. (1985). Setting the record straight: A critique of some frequent misconceptions of the normalization principle. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 11, 69–74. doi:10.3109/13668258509008748
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Prado, C. G. (2005). Searle and Foucault on truth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511616020
   Google Scholar
• Pueschel, S. M. (2006). Adults with Down syndrome. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Race, D., Boxall, K., & Carson, I. (2005). Towards a dialogue for practice: Reconciling social role valorization and the social model of disability. Disability & Society, 20, 507–521. doi:10.1080/09687590500156196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, W. S. (2011). Social psychology (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, J., & Thomas, F. (1987). The politics of mental handicap. London, UK: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, M. (2010). Noncognitivism in ethics. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selikowitz, M. (1997). Down syndrome: The facts (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. B. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures: Living and working in a changing world. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stalker, K. (2012). Theorizing the position of people with learning difficulties within disability studies: Progress and pitfalls. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 122–135). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Therborn, G. (2008). From Marxism to post-Marxism? London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. (2006). Disability and gender: Reflections on theory and research. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8, 177–185. doi:10.1080/15017410600731368
   Google Scholar
• Tremain, S. (2002). On the subject of impairment. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 32–47). London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Tremain, S. (Ed.). (2005). Foucault and the government of disability. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S., & Mäkelä, P. (2008). A realist account of the ontology of impairment. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 93–95. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J. (2001). Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability & Society, 16, 187–205. doi:10.1080/09687590120035807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. London, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, W. (2002). Social role valorization and, or versus, “empowerment”. Mental Retardation, 40, 252–258. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0252:SRVAOV>2.0.CO;2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright, D. (2011). Downs: The history of a disability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, S., Dyson, S., & Hiles, D. (2008). Beyond normalization and impairment: Theorizing subjectivity in learning difficulties – theory and practice. Disability & Society, 23, 247–258. doi:10.1080/09687590801954018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar