Providing support for decision making to adults with intellectual disability: Perspectives of family members and workers in disability support services

References

• Antaki, C., Finlay, W., & Walton, C. (2009). Choices for people with intellectual disabilities: Official discourse and everyday practice. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 260–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., Finlay, W., Walton, C., & Pate, L. (2008). Offering choices to people with intellectual disabilities: An interactional study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(12), 1165–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission. (2014). Equality, capacity and disability in commonwealth laws: Final report. Sydney: Australian Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, M. (2017). Inclusive citizenship: Refusing the construction of “cognitive foreigners” in neo-liberal times. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 4(1), 4–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, M., & Kerzner, L. (2010). A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity: Advancing substantive equality for persons with disabilities through law, policy and practice. Toronto: Law Commission of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Beadle-Brown, J. (2015). Supported decision making in the United Kingdom: Lessons for future success. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2(1), 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beadle-Brown, J., Hutchinson, A., & Whelton, B. (2012). Person-centred active support–increasing choice, promoting independence and reducing challenging behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25(4), 291–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, CA: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Bowers, B., & Webber, R. (2011). Planning and decision making about the future care of older group home residents and transition to residential aged care. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(8), 777–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Douglas, J., Carney, T., Then, S., Wiesel, I., & Smith, E. (2017). Delivering decision-making support to people with cognitive disability – what has been learned from pilot programs in Australia from 2010–2015. Australian Journal of Social Issues. doi: 10.1002/ajs4.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Webber, R., & Bower, B. (2015). Sibling roles in the lives of older group home residents with intellectual disability: Working with staff to safeguard wellbeing. Australian Social Work, 68, 453–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonyhady, B. (2016). Reducing the inequality of luck: Keynote address at the 2015 Australasian Society for Intellectual Disability National Conference. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Boundy, M., & Fleischner, B. (2013). Supported decision making instead of guardianship: An international overview. Washington: TASC [Training & Advocacy Support Center], National Disability Rights Network.
   Google Scholar
• Bowey, L., & McGlaughlin, A. (2005). Assessing the barriers to achieving genuine housing choice for adults with a learning disability: The views of family carers and professionals. British Journal of Social Work, 35(1), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, I., & Brown, R. I. (2009). Choice as an aspect of quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6(1), 11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31–57). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burgen, B. (2010). Women with cognitive impairment and unplanned or unwanted pregnancy: A 2-year audit of women contacting the pregnancy advisory service. Australian Social Work, 63(1), 18–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (2013). Participation & service access rights for people with intellectual disability: A role for law? Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 38(1), 59–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, T., & Beaupert, F. (2013). Public and private bricolage-challenges balancing law, services & civil society in advancing CRPD supported decision making. UNSW Law Journal, 36(1): 175–201.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Conder, J., Mirfin-Veitch, B., Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2011). Planned pregnancy, planned parenting: Enabling choice for adults with a learning disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. J., & Browder, D. M. (2001). Preparing staff to enhance active participation of adults with severe disabilities by offering choice and prompting performance during a community purchasing activity. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22(1), 1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspectives in the research process. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, United Kingdom. (2010). Nothing ventured, nothing gained: Risk guidance for people with dementia. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. (2012). Supporting decision making – a quick reference guide for disability support workers. Melbourne: Disability Services Division Victorian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., Bigby, C., Knox, L., & Browning, M. (2015). Factors that underpin the delivery of effective decision-making support for people with cognitive disability. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2, 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, M., Clare, I., & Holland, A. (2010). Living “a life like ours”: Support workers’ accounts of substitute decision-making in residential care homes for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(2), 144–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellem, K., O’Connor, M., Wilson, J., & Williams, S. (2013). Social work with marginalised people who have a mild or borderline intellectual disability: Practicing gentleness and encouraging hope. Australian Social Work, 66(1), 56–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espiner, D., & Hartnett, F. M. (2012). “I felt I was in control of the meeting”: Facilitating planning with adults with an intellectual disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(1), 62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M., Jarrett, D., & Terras, M. (2011). Inclusion and healthcare choices: The experiences of adults with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(1), 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Z., Bailey, R., & Willner, P. (2012). Practical aspects of a visual aid to decision making. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(6), 588–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., Redley, M., & Holland, A. (2011). Duty of care and autonomy: How support workers managed the tension between protecting service users from risk and promoting their independence in a specialist group home. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(9), 873–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, E., McGuire, B., Evans, D., & Carley, S. (2009). Sexuality and personal relationships for people with an intellectual disability. Part I: Service-user perspectives. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(11), 905–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, J. S., & Luken, K. (2006). Stakeholders’ perceptions of planning needs to support retirement choices by persons with developmental disabilities. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 40(2), 96–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, A. (2002). More or less independent. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(16), 828–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2015). “The biggest thing is trying to live for two people”: The experience of making decisions within spousal relationships after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 29(6), 745–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2016a). “I’ve never been a yes person”: decision-making participation and self-conceptualisation after severe traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2016b). Becoming a decision-making supporter for someone with acquired cognitive disability following traumatic brain injury. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(1), 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2016c). “I won’t be around forever”: Understanding the decision-making experiences of adults with severe TBI and their parents. Neuropscychological Rehabilitation, 26(2), 236–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, N. A., & Blumenthal, J. A. (2014). A critical assessment of supported decision-making for persons aging with intellectual disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 7(1), S40–S43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (2000). Autonomy refigured. In C. Mackenzie, & N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy. Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2004). Person-centred planning or person-centred action? A response to the commentaries. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, A., Mayes, R., & McConnell, D. (2010). Negotiating autonomy within the family: The experiences of young adults with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), 194–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Scheme Act. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2013A00020
   Google Scholar
• Nota, L., Ferrari, L., Soresi, S., & Wehmeyer, M. (2007). Self-determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(11), 850–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, J., & Lyle O’Brien, C. (Eds.). (2002). Implementing person-centred planning: Voices of experience. Toronto: Inclusion Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pilnick, A., Clegg, J., Murphy, E., & Almack, K. (2010). Questioning the answer: Questioning style, choice and self-determination in interactions with young people with intellectual disabilities. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(3), 415–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratti, V., Hassiotis, A., Crabtree, J., Deb, S., Gallagher, P., & Unwin, G. (2016). The effectiveness of person-centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 57, 63–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossow-Kimball, B., & Goodwin, D. (2009). Self-determination and leisure experiences of women living in two group homes. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 26(1), 1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Series, L. (2015). Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support paradigms. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 40, 80–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shogren, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2015). A framework for research and intervention design in supported decision-making. Inclusion, 3(1), 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Silvers, A., & Francis, L. (2009). Thinking about the good: Reconfiguring liberal metaphysics (or not) for people with cognitive disabilities. Metaphilosophy, 40(3–4), 475–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, D., & Gulyurtlu, S. (2014). A scoping review of personalization in the UK; approaches to social work and people with learning disabilities. Health and Social Care, 22, 13–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowney, M., & Barr, O. (2007). The challenges for nurses communicating with and gaining valid consent from adults with intellectual disabilities within the accident and emergency care service. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(9), 1678–1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainton, T. (2016). Supported decision-making in Canada: Principles, policy and practice. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Then, S. (2013). Evolution and innovation in guardianship laws: Assisted decision-making. Sydney Law Review, 35(1), 133–166.
   Google Scholar
• Tideman, M. (2016, November 18). Swedish “god man”: An unique supported decision making system – but does it work? Paper presented to the Living with Disability Research Center Roundtable: Supporting people with cognitive disabilities with decision making, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Timmons, J. C., Hall, A. C., Bose, J., Wolfe, A., & Winsor, J. (2011). Choosing employment: Factors that impact employment decisions for individuals with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 285–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2006). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg, B., & Kjellberg, A. (2010). Participation when using cognitive assistive devices – from the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 17(4), 168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willner, P., Bailey, R., Parry, R., & Dymond, S. (2010). Evaluation of the ability of people with intellectual disabilities to “weigh up” information in two tests of financial reasoning. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(4), 380–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar