References
- Akkerman, A., Janssen, C. G. C., Kef, S., & Meiniger, H. P. (2014). Perspectives of employees with intellectual disabilities on themes relevant to their job satisfaction. An explorative study using photovoice. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(6), 542–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12092
- Benoot, T., Dursin, W., Verschuere, B., & Roose, R. (2020). Lessons from Ricoeur’s ‘capable human being’ for practices of personalisation in three European Countries. Disability & Society, 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1769561
- Bonvin, J. M. (2011). Reframing the issue of responsibility in labour market activation policies. In R. Rogowski, R. Salais, & N. Whiteside (Eds.), Transforming European employment policy: Labour market transitions and the promotion of capability (pp. 138–156). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Booth, T., & Booth, W. (2003). In the frame: Photovoice and mothers with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 18(4), 431–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000080986
- Clarke, J. (2005). New Labour’s citizens: Activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned? Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 447–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018305057024
- De Wilde, L., Roets, R., & Vanobbergen, B. (2019). Discovering dimensions of research ethics in doing oral history: Going public in the case of the Ghent orphanages. Qualitative Research, 20(3), 294–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119851330
- Dean, H. (2004). The ethics of welfare: Human rights, dependency and responsibility. The Policy Press.
- Dean, H. (2015). Social rights and human welfare. Routledge.
- Department of Welfare, Public Health and Family Affairs. (2018). Policy white paper. Flemish Government.
- Dermaut, V., Schiettecat, T., Vandevelde, S., & Roets, G. (2020). Citizenship, disability rights and the changing relationship between formal and informal caregivers: It takes three to tango. Disability & Society, 35(2), 280–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1634521
- DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
- Dowse, L. (2009). “Some people are never going to be able to do that”. challenges for people with intellectual disability in the twenty-first century. Disability & Society, 24(5), 571–584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590903010933
- Ferguson, I. (2007). Increasing user choice or Privatizing Risk? The Antinomies of Personalization. British Journal of Social Work, 37(3), 387–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm016
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
- Goodley, D. (1996). Tales of hidden lives: A critical examination of life history research with people who have learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 11(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599627642
- Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. Routledge.
- Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019). Provocations for critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 34(6), 972–997. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889
- Goodley, D., & Roets, G. (2008). The (be)comings and goings of developmental disabilities: The cultural politics of ‘impairment’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 29(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300801966971
- Gridley, K., Brooks, J., & Glendinning, C. (2014). Good practice in social care: The views of people with severe and complex needs and those who support them. Health and Social Care in the Community, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10:1111/hsc.12105
- Johnson, K., & Traustadòttir, R. (2005). In and Out of Institutions. In K. Johnson, & R. Traustadòttir (Eds.), Deinstitutionalisation and people with intellectual disabilities. in and out of institutions (pp. 13–29). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- Jurkowski, J. M. (2008). Photovoice as participatory action research tool for engaging people with intellectual disabilities in research and program development. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2008)46[1:PAPART]2.0.CO;2
- Jurkowski, J. M., & Paul-Ward, A. (2007). Photovoice with vulnerable populations: Addressing disparities in health promotion among people with intellectual disabilities. Health Promotion Practice, 8(4), 358–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839906292181
- Leadbeater, C. (2004). Personalization through Participation: A new script for public services. Demos.
- Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. Macmillan.
- Mansell, J. (2006). Deinstitutionalisation and community living: Progress, problems and priorities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250600686726
- Mitchel, C. (2011). Doing visual research. Sage Publications.
- Mladenov, T. (2015). Critical theory and disability: A phenomenological approach. Bloomsbury.
- Nussbaum, M. (1988). Nature, function, and capability: Aristotle on political distribution. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 1(Supplementary), 145–184.
- Nussbaum, M. (2000). Woman and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. The Belknap Press Harvard University Press.
- Nussbaum, M. (2009). The capabilities of people with cognitive disabilities. Metaphilosophy, 40(3-4), 331–351. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01606.x
- Ottman, G., & Crosbie, J. (2013). Mixed method approaches in open-ended, qualitative, exploratory research involving people with intellectual disabilities: A comparative methods study. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 17(3), 182–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629513494927
- Otto, H. U., Walker, M., & Ziegler, H. (2018). Capability promoting policies, enhancing individual and social development. Policy Press.
- Overmars-Marx, T., Thomése, F., & Moonen, X. (2018). Photovoice in research involving people with intellectual disabilities: A guided photovoice approach as an alternative. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(1), e92–e104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12329
- Owens, J., Mladenov, T., & Cribb, A. (2017). What justice, what autonomy? The ethical constraints upon personalisation. Ethics and Social Welfare, 11(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2016.1234631
- Povee, K., Bishop, B. J., & Roberts, L. D. (2014). The use of photovoice with people with intellectual disabilities: Reflections, challenges and opportunities. Disability & Society, 29(6), 893–907. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.874331
- Ricœur, P. (2005). The course of recognition. Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Robeyns, I. (2003). The capability approach: An interdisciplinary introduction. University of Amsterdam.
- Roets, G., Dermaut, V., Benoot, T., Claes, C., Schiettecat, T., Roose, R., Van lancker, W., & Vandevelde, S. (2020). A critical analysis of disability policy in practice in Flanders; towards differentiated manifestations of interdependency. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12336
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Knopf.
- Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. Penguin, Allen Lane.
- Shumba, T. W., & Moodley, I. (2018). Part 1: A review of using photovoice as a disability research method: Implications for eliciting the experiences of persons with disabilities on the community based Rehabilitation programme in Namibia. African Journal of Disability, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v7i0.418
- van Heumen, L., & Schippers, L. (2016). Quality of life for young adults with intellectual disability following individualised support: Individual and family responses. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 41(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2016.1213797
- Vandekinderen, C., Roets, G., & Van Hove, G. (2014). The researcher and the beast: Uncovering processes of othering and becoming animal in research ventures in the field of critical disability studies. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413489267
- Walker, M. (2006). Towards a capability-based theory of social justice in education. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500500245
- Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. (1994). Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819402100204
- Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
- Williams, F. (2001). In and beyond New Labour: Towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 467–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830102100405
- Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning Real Utopias. Verso.