Networks of support: Microboards for children with intellectual disability

References

• Afshordi, N., & Liberman, Z. (2021). Keeping friends in mind: Development of friendship concepts in early childhood. Social Development, 30(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2008). Known well by no-one: Trends in the informal social networks of middle-aged and older people with intellectual disability five years after moving to the community. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250802094141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Fyffe, C. (2012). Services and families working together to support adults with intellectual disability. In Proceedings of the sixth roundtable on intellectual disability policy, Bundoora, VIC Australia. La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• DeZonia, K. (2009). Microboards: An option in life span supports. Exceptional Parent, 39(11), 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, W. M. L., Antaki, C., Walton, C., & Stribling, P. (2008). The dilemma for staff in ‘playing a game’ with a person with profound intellectual disabilities: Empowerment, inclusion and competence in interactional practice. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(4), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01080.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, C., & Rizzolo, M. C. (2018). Friendship, quality of life, and people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 30(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9576-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. M., Wendel, K. F., Day, T. L., & McMillan, E. D. (2016). Developing peer supports for college students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(3), 263–269.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, L., & Schaper, M. T. (2012). Microboards: What are they and how do they work? Training & Management Development Methods, 26(4), 401–406.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., Douglas, J., Bigby, C., & Iacono, T. (2012). A model of processes that underpin positive relationships for adults with severe intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 37(4), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2012.732221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamstra, A., van der Putten, A. A., & Vlaskamp, C. (2015). The structure of informal social networks of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 28(3), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruithof, K., Ijzerman, L., Nieuwenhuijse, A., Huisman, S., Schippers, A., Willems, D., & Olsman, E. (2021). Siblings’ and parents’ perspectives on the future care for their family member with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A qualitative study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 46(4), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2021.1892261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruithof, K., Olsman, E., Nieuwenhuijse, A., & Willems, D. (2022). “I hope I’ll outlive him”: A qualitative study of parents’ concerns about being outlived by their child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 47(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2021.1920377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. E., & Burke, M. M. (2020). Future planning among families of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, J., Stollon, N., Wu, K., Liang, A., Changolkar, S., Steinway, C., Trachtenberg, S., Coccia, A., Devaney, M., & Jan, S. (2019). Domains of planning for future long-term care of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Parent and sibling perspectives. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(5), 1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, P., Oh, J., Leahy, K. E., & Chopik, W. J. (2021). Friendship importance around the world: Links to cultural factors, health, and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes, B., Lambrechts, G., Hostyn, I., & Petry, K. (2007). Quality-enhancing interventions for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A review of the empirical research literature. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250701549427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microboards Australia. (2016). Microboards Australia. Retrieved June 28, 2021, from http://microboard.org.au/
   Google Scholar
• Narr, R. K., Allen, J. P., Tan, J. S., & Loeb, E. L. (2019). Close friendship strength and broader peer group desirability as differential predictors of adult mental health. Child Development, 90(1), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry, K., Maes, B., & Vlaskamp, C. (2009). Measuring the quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities using the QOL-PMD: First results. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(6), 1394–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, G., Gur, A., & Watson, J. (2018). Ageism, moral agency and autonomy: Getting beyond guardianship in the 21st century. In I Doron & N Georgantzi (Eds.), Ageing, ageism and the law (pp. 51–71). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sigstad, H. M. H. (2016). Significance of friendship for quality of life in adolescents with mild intellectual disability: A parental perspective. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 41(4), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2016.1200018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainton, T., Morris, R., Borja, C., Nei, C., Cook, S., Perry, L., & Bahadshah, Z. (2020). Microboards™, social capital and quality of life.
   Google Scholar
• Stotsky, M. T., & Bowker, J. C. (2018). An examination of reciprocal associations between social preference, popularity, and friendship during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(9), 1830–1841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0846-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Voss, H., & Bloomer, M. J. (2019). Placing the preferences of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities at the center of end-of-life decision making through storytelling. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(4), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919879701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Wilson, E., & Hagiliassis, N. (2017). Supporting end of life decision making: Case studies of relational closeness in supported decision making for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(6), 1022–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherow, D., & Wetherow, F. (2004). Microboards and microboard association design, development and implementation. Retrieved August 22, 2023, from https://www.communityworks.info/articles/microboard.html
   Google Scholar