Stuttering inhibition via visual feedback at normal and fast speech rates

References

• Alm, P.. 2004. Stuttering and the basal ganglia circuits: a critical review of possible relations. Journal of Communication Disorders. 37, 325–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, P., 2005, On the causal mechanisms of stuttering. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Lund University, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Bloodstein, O., Bernstein-Ratner, N., 2008, A Handbook on Stuttering, 6th edn New York, NY: Thomson-Delmar.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. and Weenink, D., 2009, Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.08) [Computer Program] (available at: http://www.praat.org/) (accessed on 21 June 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Brady, J. P.. 1969. Studies on the metronome effect on stuttering. Behavioral Research and Therapy. 7, 197–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherry, C., Sayers, B.. 1956. Experiments upon the total inhibition of stammering by external control, and some clinical results. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1, 233–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J.. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational Psychology Measures. 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayalu, V. N., 2004, Inhibition of stuttering from second speech signals. Unpublished doctoral thesis, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., Paik, M. C., 2003, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd edn Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons3rdn.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, G., Bloom, K. K.. 1990. The alien hand sign. Localization, lateralization and recovery. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 69, 228–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guntupalli, V. K., Kalinowski, J., Saltuklaroglu, T., Nanjundeswaran, C.. 2005. The effects of temporal modification of second speech signals on stuttering inhibition at two speech rates in adults. Neuroscience Letters. 385, 7–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannan, R., Morris, S.. 1977. Stuttering, speech rate, and the metronome effect. Perceptual Motor Skills. 44, 452–454.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrave, S., Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A., Armson, J., Jones, K.. 1994. Effect of frequency-altered feedback on stuttering frequency at normal and fast speech rates. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 37, 1313–1319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howell, P., Au-Yeung, J., 2002, The EXPLAN Theory of Fluency Control and the Diagnosis of Stuttering 2005. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory Series: Pathology and Therapy of Speech Disorders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, J., Armson, J., Roland-Mieszowski, M., Stuart, A., Gracco, V. L.. 1993. Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency. Language and Speech. 36, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, J., Armson, J., Stuart, A.. 1995. Effect of normal and fast articulatory rates on stuttering frequency. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 20, 293–302.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A.. 1996. Stuttering amelioration at various auditory feedback delays and speech rates. European Journal of Disorders of Communication. 31, 259–269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalinowski, J., Dayalu, V. N.. 2002. A common element in the immediate inducement of effortless, natural-sounding, fluent speech in people who stutter: ‘the second speech signal’. Medical Hypotheses. 58, 61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, J., Saltuklaroglu, T.. Choral speech: the amelioration of stuttering via imitation and the mirror neuronal system. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2003a; 27, 339–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, J., Saltuklaroglu, T.. Speaking with a mirror: engagement of mirror neurons via choral speech and its derivatives induces stuttering inhibition. Medical Hypotheses. 2003b; 60, 538–543.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, J., Saltuklaroglu, T., 2005, Stuttering Abingdon: Plural.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A., Rastatter, M. P., Snyder, G., Dayalu, V.. 2000. Inducement of fluent speech in persons who stutter via visual choral speech. Neuroscience Letters. 281, 198–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauramäki, J., Jaaskelainen, I. P., Hari, R., Mottonen, R., Rauschecker, J. P., Sams, M.. 2010. Lipreading and covert speech production similarly modulate human auditory-cortex responses to pure tones. Journal of Neuroscience. 30, 1314–1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keifte, M., Armson, J.. 2008. Dissecting choral speech: properties of the accompanist critical to stuttering reduction. Journal of Communication Disorders. 41, 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kuniszyk-Jozkowiak, W., Adamczyk, B.. 1989. Effect of tactile reverberation on the speech fluency of stutterers. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Research. 12, 312–317.
   Google Scholar
• Kuniszyk-Jozkowiak, W., Smolka, E., Adamczyk, B.. 1996. Effect of acoustical, visual and tactile echo on speech fluency of stutterers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 48, 193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kuniszyk-Jozkowiak, W., Smolka, E., Adamczyk, B.. 1997. Effect of acoustical, visual and tactile reverberation on speech fluency of stutterers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 49, 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. G.. 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition. 21, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., Whalen, D. H.. 2000. On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4, 187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, M., Packman, A., Onslow, M.. 2006. Altered auditory feedback and the treatment of stuttering: a review. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 31, 71–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., Rubin, D. B., 2002, Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd edn New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, J., Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A., Armson, J.. 1995. Effect of single and combined altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency at two speech rates. Journal of Communication Disorders. 28, 217–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max, L., Guenther, F. H., Gracco, V. L., Gosh, S. S., Wallace, M. E.. 2004. Internal models and feedback-biased motor control as sources of dysfluency: a theoretical model of stuttering. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders. 31, 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Nishitani, N., Hari, R.. 2002. Viewing lip forms: cortical dynamics. Neuron. 36, 1211–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panico, J., Healey, E. C., Brouwer, K., Susca, M.. 2005. Listener perceptions of stuttering across two presentation modes: a quantitative and qualitative approach. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 30, 65–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passingham, R. E.. 1987. Two cortical systems for directing movement. Ciba Foundation Symposium. 132, 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkola, J., Ojanen, V., Autti, T., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Möttönen, R., Sams, M.. 2006. Attention to visual speech gestures enhances hemodynamic activity in the left planum temporale. Human Brain Mapping. 27, 471–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rami, M. K., Kalinowski, J., Rastatter, M. P., Holbert, D., Allen, M.. 2005. Choral reading with filtered speech: effect on stuttering. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 100, 421–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Arbib, M. A.. 1998. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences. 21, 188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, I., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Jones, M.. 2008. Comparisons of audio and audiovisual measures of stuttering frequency and severity in preschool-age children. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology. 17, 173–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltuklaroglu, T., Dayalu, V. N., Kalinowski, J.. 2002. Reduction of stuttering: the dual inhibition hypothesis. Medical Hypothesis. 58, 67–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltuklaroglu, T., Dayalu, V. N., Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A., Rastatter, M. P.. 2004. Say it with me: stuttering inhibited. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 26, 161–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sams, M., Möttönen, R., Sihvonen, T.. 2005. Seeing and hearing others and oneself talk. Cognitive Brain Research. 23, 429–435.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman, F. H., 1996, Stuttering and Other Fluency Disorders, 2nd edn Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Adamczyk, B.. 1992. Influence of visual echo and visual reverberation on speech fluency in stutterers. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Research. 15, 134–139.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G., 2004, Exploratory research in the role of cognitive initiation in the enhanced fluency phenomenon. Unpublished doctoral thesis, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. J., Hough, M. S., Blanchet, P., Ivy, L. J., Waddell, D.. 2009. The effects of self-generated synchronous and asynchronous visual speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency. Journal of Communication Disorders. 42, 235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, A., Kalinowski, J.. 1996. Fluent speech, fast articulatory rate, and delayed auditory feedback: creating a crisis for a scientific revolution?. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 82, 211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Studdert-Kennedy, M., Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Cooper, F. S.. 1970. Theoretical notes. motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review. Psychological Review. 77, 234–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. M., Jordan, T. R.. 2004. Contributions of oral and extraoral facial movement to visual and audiovisual speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance. 30, 873–888.
   Google Scholar
• van Riper, C., 1971, The Nature of Stuttering Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, M. E., 1976, Stuttering: Theory and Treatment Irvington: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, A. J.. 1963. Delayed auditory feedback. Psychological Bulletin. 60, 213–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar