Intelligibility of oesophageal and tracheo-oesophageal speech: preliminary observations

References

• Baggs T, Pine S. Acoustic characteristics: tracheoesophageal speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 1983; 16: 299–307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blakley BW, Podraza BL. Acoustic and perceptual assessment of speech using a voice-prosthesis with valvular and manual occlusion. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery 1987; 97: 552–557
   Google Scholar
• Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamaker RC. Tracheostoma valve for postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 1982; 91: 576–578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood GW, Luther AR, Stemple JC. Coping and adjustment in alaryngeal speakers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1992; 1: 63–69
   Google Scholar
• Bridges A. Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1991; 26: 325–335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke WM, Hoops HR. The effect of speech-type background noise on esophageal speech production. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 1970; 79: 653–665
   Google Scholar
• Clark JG, Stemple JC. Assessment of three modes of alaryngeal speech with a synthetic sentence identification (SSI) task in varying message-to-competition ratios. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1982; 25: 333–338
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullinan WL, Brown CS, Blalock PD. Ratings of intelligibility of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 1986; 19: 185–195
   Google Scholar
• Doyle PC, Danhauer JL, Mendel LL. A Sindscal analysis of perceptual features for consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1990; 55: 756–760
   Google Scholar
• Doyle PC, Danhauer JL, Reed CG. Listeners' perceptions of consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1988; 53: 400–407
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doyle PC, Swift ER, Haaf RG. Effects of listener sophistication on judgements of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility. Journal of Communication Disorders 1989; 22: 105–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filter MD, Hyman M. Relationship of acoustic parameters and perceptual ratings of esophageal speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1975; 40: 63–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto PA, Madison CL, Larrigan LB. The effects of a tracheostoma valve on the intelligibility and quality of tracheoesophageal speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 33–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greene MCL. The Voice and Its Disorders. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia 1964
   Google Scholar
• Holley SC, Lerman J, Randolph K. A comparison of the intelligibility of esophageal, electrolaryngeal, and normal speech in quiet and in noise. Journal of Communication Disorders 1983; 16: 143–155
   Google Scholar
• Hoops HR, Curtis JF. Intelligibility of the esophageal speaker. Archives of Otolaryngology 1971; 93: 300–303
   Google Scholar
• Hyman M. An experimental study of artificial larynx and esophageal speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1955; 20: 291–299
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalb M, Carpenter M. Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1981; 46: 77–80
   Google Scholar
• Kent RD, Weismer G, Kent JF, Rosenbek JC. Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 482–499
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinishi M, Amatsu M. Pitch perturbation measures of voice production of laryngectomees after the Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt operation. Auris Nasus Larynx 1986; 13: 53–62
   Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, Erman A, Berke GS. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993; 36: 21–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Max L, Steurs W, De Bruyn W. Vocal capacities in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 93–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey R, Mulligan M. The relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1963; 28: 37–41
   Google Scholar
• Cancer of the Head and Neck, EN Myers, JY Suen. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Miralles JL, Cervera T. Voice intelligibility in patients who have undergone laryngectomies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995; 38: 564–571
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neale JM, Liebert RM. Science and Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1986
   Google Scholar
• Nichols AC. Confusions in recognizing phonemes spoken by esophageal speakers: I. Initial consonants and clusters. Journal of Communication Disorders 1976; 9: 27–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols AC. Confusions in recognizing phonemes spoken by esophageal speakers: II. Vowels and diphthongs. Journal of Communication Disorders 1976; 9: 247–260
   Google Scholar
• Nichols AC. Confusions in recognizing phonemes spoken by esophageal speakers: III. Terminal consonants and clusters. Journal of Communication Disorders 1977; 10: 285–299
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary IK, Heaton JM, Clegg RT, Parker AJ. Acceptability and intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech using the Groningen Valve. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 1994; 46: 180–187
   Google Scholar
• Panje W. Prosthetic vocal rehabilitation following laryngectomy: the voice button. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1981; 90: 116–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pindzola RH, Cain BH. Acceptability ratings of tracheoesophageal speech. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 394–397
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pouloski BR, Fisher HB, Kempster GB, Blom ED. Statistical differentiation of tracheoesophageal speech produced under four prosthetic/occlusion speaking conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1989; 32: 591–599
   Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Weinberg B. Characteristics of voicing source waveforms produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995; 38: 536–548
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbins J. Acoustic differentiation of laryngeal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984; 27: 577–585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbins J, Fisher HB, Blom ED, Singer MI. A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1984; 49: 202–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbins J, Fisher HB, Blom ED, Singer MI. Selected acoustic features of tracheoesophageal, esophageal, and laryngeal speech. Archives of Otolaryngology 1984; 110: 670–672
   Google Scholar
• Shames GH, Font J, Mathews J. Factors related to speech proficiency of the laryngectomized. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1963; 28: 273–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman FH. Research Design and Evaluation in Speech-language Pathology and Audiology (third edition). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1993
   Google Scholar
• Singer MI. Tracheoesophageal speech: vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 1983; 93: 1454–1465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer MI, Blom ED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology 1980; 89: 529–533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardy-Mitzell S, Andrews ML, Bowman SA. Acceptability and intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech. Archives of Otolaryngology 1985; 111: 213–215
   Google Scholar
• Trudeau MD. A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Journal of Communication Disorders 1987; 20: 41–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Riper C, Emerick L. Speech Correction: An Introduction to Speech Pathology and Audiology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1984
   Google Scholar
• Williams S, Watson J. Differences in speaking proficiencies in three laryngectomee groups. Archives of Otolaryngology 1985; 111: 216–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams SE, Watson JB. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing. Laryngoscope 1987; 97: 737–739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR. A comparison of techniques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 1978; 11: 499–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR. Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech. CC Publications, Tigard, OR 1981
   Google Scholar
• Zanoff DJ, Wold D, Montague JC, Krueger K, Drummond S. Tracheoesophageal speech: with and without tracheostoma valve. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 498–502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar