References
- Siris ES, Gehlbach S, Adachi JD, et al. Failure to perceive increased risk of fracture in women 55 years and older: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). Osteoporos Int 2010 April 1. Epub ahead of print
- Hooven FH, Adachi JD, Adami S, et al. The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW): rationale and study design. Osteoporos Int 2009;20:1107–16
- Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, et al. The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 2007;18:1033–46
- Gerend MA, Erchull MJ, Aiken LS, Maner JK. Reasons and risk: factors underlying women's perceptions of susceptibility to osteoporosis. Maturitas 2006;55:227–37
- Miller DT, Ross M. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychol Bull 1975;82:213–25
- Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR. Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA 2009;301:513–21
- Saag KG, Geusens P. Progress in osteoporosis and fracture prevention: focus on postmenopausal women. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:251
- van Geel TA, van den Bergh JP, Dinant GJ, Geusens PP. Individualizing fracture risk prediction. Maturitas 2010;65:143–8
- Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, Beaton DE. Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:767–78