References
- Gutierrez C, Scheid P. The history of family medicine and its impact in us health care delivery. American Association of Family Physicians Website. Available at http://www.aafpfoundation.org/online/etc/medialib/found/documents/programs/chfm/foundationgutierrezpaper.Par.0001.File.tmp/foundation-gutierrezpaper.pdf (accessed 3 April 2011).
- Tandeter H, Granek-Catarivas M. Choosing primary care? Influences of medical school curricula on career pathways. Israel Med Assoc J. 2001;3:969–72.
- Rabadán FE, López-Torres Hidalgo J. Changes in knowledge and attitudes toward family medicine after completing a primary care course. Fam Med. 2010;42:35–40.
- Henderson E, Berlin A, Fuller J. Attitude of medical students towards general practice and general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:359–63.
- http://www.euract.org (accessed 3 April 2011).
- Wilm S. Checklist for attachment program organisers. EURACT, Leuven 2005. http://www.euract.org/index.php?folder_id = 19 (accessed 3 April 2011).
- Chumley H. The family medicine clerkship core content curriculum. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7:281–2.
- O'Brien-Gonzales A, Chessman AW, Sheets KJ. Family medicine clerkship curriculum: Competencies and resources. Fam Med. 2007;39:43–6.
- Milman U, Alperin M, Reis S, Van-Ralte R, Hermoni D. Determining teaching objectives for the family medicine clerkship in medical school; an Israeli national Delphi survey. Israel Med Assoc J. 2001;3:978–81.
- Inui TS, Williams WT Jr, Goode L, Anderson RJ, Bhak KN, Forsyth JD, . Sustaining the development of primary care in academic medicine. Acad Med 1998;72:245–57.
- Robbins AS, Cope DW, Campbell L, Vivell S. Expert rating of primary care goals and objectives. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:429–35.
- The Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) working committee to develop curricular guidelines for a third-year family medicine clerkship. National curricular guidelines for third-year family medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 1991; 66:534–9.
- Helmer O. Convergence of expert consensus through feedback. Los Angeles: Rand Corporation; 1964. 2973.
- Bowles N. The Delphi technique. Nursing Standard 1999; 13:32–6.
- Thompson M. Considering the implication of variations within Delphi research. Fam Pract. 2009;26:420–4.
- Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001;38:195–200.
- World Health Organization 2008. The World Health Report 2008—primary health care (now more than ever). WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at http://www.who.int/whr/2008/whr08_en.pdf (accessed 3 April 2011).
- Soler JK, Carelli F, Lionis C, Yaman H. The wind of change: After the European definition—orienting undergraduate medical education towards general practice/family medicine. Eur J Gen Pract. 2007;13:248–51.
- General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: GMC; 1993.
- Astin JA, Sierpina VS, Forys K, Clarridge B. Integration of the biopsychosocial model: Perspectives of medical students and residents. Acad Med. 2008;83:20–7.