Patient satisfaction with family practice in Turkey: Three-year trend from 2010 to 2012

References

• Turkish Constitution—Title 5. Aims and duties of the State. Available at: https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/anayasa/anayasa_2011.pdf (accessed 10 July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Marotta A. Total quality: Priority objective to improve the services of health facilities. Professioni infermieristiche 1998;51:41–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calkin C. Change management. Quality is a target for the total team. Health Serv J. 2012;122:19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Çoruh M. Total quality management in primary care practice. Ankara: Haberal EğitimVakfı; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J. Patients’ priorities with respect to general practice care: An international comparison. European Task Force on patient evaluations of general practice (EUROPEP). Fam Pract. 1999;16:4–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensing M, Vedsted P, Kersnik J. Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: An international comparison. Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14:111–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin R. Measuring patient satisfaction. JADA 2005;136:362–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ervin NE. Does patient satisfaction contribute to nursing care quality? J Nurs Adm. 2006;36:126–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztek Z. Quality in Primary care health services. Ankara: Haberal Eğitim Vakfı; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Mollahaliloğlu S, Kosdak M, Sanisoğlu Y, Boz D, Demirok AB. Report on patient satisfaction from primary care services. Akdağ R, editor. Ankara: Hıfzıssıhha Mektebi Müdürlüğü; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mollahaliloğlu S, Kosdak M, Sanisoğlu Y, Ateşoğlu D, Çiftçi E, Tuncel T. Patient satisfaction in primary care services, 2011. Akdağ R, editor. Ankara: Hıfzıssıhha Mektebi Müdürlüğü; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Petek D, Kunzi B, Kersnik J, Szecsenyi J, Wensing M. Patients’ evaluations of European general practice—revisited after 11 years. Int J Qual Health Care 2011;23:621–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M. Patients evaluate general/family practice: The EUROPEP instrument. Nijmegen: Center for Quality of Care Research; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Klingenberg A, Bahrs O, Szecsenyi J. How do patients evaluate general practice? German results from the European project on patient evaluation of general practice care (EUROPEP). Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999;93:437–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kersnik J, Svab I, Vegnuti M. Frequent attenders in general practice: Auality of life, patient satisfaction, use of medical services and GP characteristics. Scand J Prim Health Care 2001;19:174–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milano M, Mola E, Collecchia G, Carlo AD, Giancane R, Visentin G, et al. Validation of the Italian version of the EUROPEP instrument for patient evaluation of general practice care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2007;13:92–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akturk Z, Dagdeviren N, Sahin EM, Ozer C, Yaman H, Goktas O, et al. Patients evaluate doctors: The EUROPEP instrument. Dokuz Eylul Medical Journal 2002;16:153–60.
   Google Scholar
• Dagdeviren N, Akturk Z. An evaluation of patient satisfaction in Turkey with the EUROPEP instrument. Yonsei Med J. 2004; 45:23–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensing M. EUROPEP 2006. Revised Europep instrument and user manual. The Netherlands: Center for Quality of Care Research (WOK); 2006.
   Google Scholar
• The EUROPEP questionnaire: Biomedcentral; Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1472-6963-7-46-s2.doc (accessed 4 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Press WH. Strong profiling is not mathematically optimal for discovering rare malfeasors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:1716–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classification of Turkish statistical regions. Available at: http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%BCrkiye%27nin_%C4%B0BBS%27si (accessed 4 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Pollock AV. Outcome indicators. J R Soc Med. 1993;86:311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkey—health transition project: World Bank. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/04/3239002/turkey-health-transition-project (accessed 4 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Akdağ R. Turkish health transformation project evaluation report (2003–2010). Ankara: Hıfzıssıhha Mektebi Müdürlüğü; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Smits FT, Mohrs JJ, Beem EE, Bindels PJ, van Weert HC. Defining frequent attendance in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sakkak MA, Al-Nowaiser NA, Al-Khashan HI, Al-Abdrabulnabi AA, Jaber RM. Patient satisfaction with primary health care services in Riyadh. Saudi Med J. 2008;29:432–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis SA, Al-Marzouq S, Revel T, Reed RL. Patient satisfaction with primary health care services in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:241–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods SE, Heidari Z. The influence of gender on patient satisfaction. J Gend Specif Med. 2003;6:30–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pareto analysis: Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_analysis (accessed 4 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Başara BB, Güler C, Yentür GK, Birge B, Pulgat E, Ekinci BM. Turkish health statistics yearly 2012. Ankara: Ankara: Hıfzıssıhha Mektebi Müdürlüğü; 2013.
   Google Scholar