Detection of plant-based adulterants in turmeric powder using DNA barcoding

References

• Asensio L, Gonzalez I, Garcya T, Martyn R. (2008). Determination of food authenticity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Food Control 19:1–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbuto M, Galimberti A, Ferri EE, et al. (2010). DNA barcoding reveals fraudulent substitutions in shark seafood products: The Italian case of “palombo” (Mustelus spp). Food Res Int 43:376–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuenoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW, et al. (2002). Molecular phylogenetics of caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpβ, and matK DNA sequences. Am J Bot 89:132–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanya K, Sasikumar B. (2010). Molecular marker based adulteration detection in traded food and agricultural commodities of plant origin with special reference to spices. Curr Trends Biotechnol Pharm 4:454–89
   Google Scholar
• Dhanya K, Syamkumar S, Siju S, Sasikumar B. (2011). Sequence characterised amplified region markers: A reliable tool for adulterant detection in traded turmeric powder. Food Res Int 44:2889–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2002). Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. OJ L 31:1–24
   Google Scholar
• Ford CS, Ayres KL, Toomey N, et al. (2009). Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants. Bot J Linn Soc 159:1–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galimberti A, De Mattia FA, Losa, Bruni I. (2013). DNA barcoding as a new tool for food traceability. Food Res Int 50:55–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gismondi A, Fanali F, Labarga JMM, et al. (2013). Crocus sativus L. genomics and different DNA barcode applications. Plant Syst Evol 299:1859–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. (1999). BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acid Symp Ser 41:95–8
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, de Waard JR. (2003). Biological identification through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond 270:313–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress WJ, Erickson DL. (2007). A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: The coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2:1–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Kahlon T, Chaudhary S. (2011). A rapid screening for adulterants in olive oil using DNA barcodes. Food Chem 127:1335–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmi S, Padmaja G, Remani P. (2011). Antitumour effects of isocurcumenol isolated from Curcuma zedoaria rhizomes on human and murine cancer cells. Int J Med Chem [Online] Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijmc/2011/253962/ [last accessed 12 Jun 2014]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, et al. (2007). Clustal W & Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockley AK, Bardsley RG. (2000). DNA-based methods for food authentication. Trends Food Sci Tech 11:67–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafra I, Ferreira IMPVO, Oliveira MBPPO. (2008). Food authentication by PCR-based methods. Eur Food Res Technol 227:649–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus DM, Grollman AP. (2002). Botanical medicines – The need for new regulations. N Engl J Med 347:2073–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattia DF, Bruni I, Galimberti A, et al. (2010). A comparative study of different DNA barcoding markers for the identification of some members of Lamiacaea. Food Res Int 44:693–702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmaster SG, Grguic M, Shanmughanadhan D, Ramalingam S. (2013). DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med 11:222–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvathy VA, Swetha VP, Sheeja TE, et al. (2014). DNA barcoding to detect chilli adulteration in traded black pepper powder. Food Biotechnol 28:25–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettengill JB, Neel MC. (2010). An evaluation of candidate plant DNA barcodes and assignment methods in diagnosing 29 species in the genus Agalinis (Orobanchaceae). Am J Bot 97:1392–406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotto A. (2004). Turmeric-post harvest operations. In: Mazaud F, Rottger A, Steffel K, eds. INPhO Post Harvest Compendium. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organizations of United Nations. FAO, 2–8
   Google Scholar
• Remya R, Syamkumar S, Sasikumar B. (2004). Isolation and amplification of DNA from turmeric powder. Br Food J 106:673–8
   Google Scholar
• Sasikumar B. (2005). Genetic resources of Curcuma: Diversity, characterization and utilization. Plant Genet Res 3:130–51
   Google Scholar
• Sasikumar B, Syamkumar S, Remya R, John Zachariah T. (2005). PCR based detection of adulteration in the market samples of turmeric powder. Food Biotechnol 18:299–306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srirama R, Senthilkumar U, Sreejayan N, et al. (2010). Assessing species admixtures in raw drug trade of Phyllanthus, a hepato-protective plant using molecular tools. J Ethanopharmacol 130:208–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoeckle MY, Gamble CC, Kirpekar R, et al. (2011). Commercial teas highlight plant DNA barcode identification successes and obstacles. Sci Rep 1:42–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Peterson D, Stecher G, et al. (2011). MEGA 5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi AM, Tyagi A, Kumar A, et al. (2013). The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and trnH-psbA are suitable candidate loci for DNA barcoding of tropical tree species of India. PLoS ONE [Online]. Available from: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0057934 [last accessed 12 Jun 2014]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbatsch LE, Baldwin BG, Donoghue MJ. (2000). Phylogeny of the coneflowers and relatives (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences and chloroplast DNA restriction site data. Syst Bot 25:539–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayan K, Tsou CH. (2010). DNA barcoding in plants: Taxonomy in a new perspective. Curr Sci 99:1530–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace LJ, Boilard SMAL, Eagle SHC, et al. (2012). DNA barcodes for everyday life: Routine authentication of natural health products. Food Res Int 49:446–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan M, Wei MFU, Cheng XJ. (2011). Identification of species within Tetrastigma (Miq.) Planch. (Vitaceae) based on DNA barcoding techniques. J Syst Evol 49:237–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar