Voice and speech range profiles and Voice Handicap Index for males — methodological issues and data

References

• Holmberg EB, Ihre E, Södersten M. Phonetograms as a tool in the voice clinic: changes across voice therapy for patients with vocal fatigue. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2007; 32:113–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma E, Robertson J, Radford C, Vagne S, El-Halabi R, Yiu E. Reliability of speaking and maximum voice range measures in screening for dysphonia. J Voice. 2007;21:397–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramming P. The phonetogram: an experimental and clinical study [doctoral thesis]. Malmö, Sweden: Department of Otolaryngology, Lund University; 1988. 1–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ma E, Yiu E. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity. J Voice. 2006;20:380–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister A, Sederholm E, Sundberg J, Gramming P. Relations between voice range profiles and physiological and perceptual voice characteristics in ten-year-old children. J Voice. 1994;8:230–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman A, Agresti CJ, Blumstein E, Sharma G. Meaningful features of voice range profiles from patients with organic vocal fold pathology: a preliminary study. J Voice. 1996;10: 269–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamarche A, Ternström S. An exploration of skin acceleration level as a measure of phonatory function in singing. J Voice. 2008;22:10–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN. Phonetographic profiles and F0-SPL characteristics of untrained versus trained vocal groups. J Voice. 1991;5:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN. Superimposition of speaking voice characteristics and phonetograms in untrained and trained vocal groups. J Voice. 1993;7:30–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotby MN, Abul-Ela MY, Orabi AA. Voice range profile as a quantitative measure of vocal function: Normative data. In: Kotby MN. XXIII World Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. 6–10 August 1995. Cairo: Secretariat of the XXIII World Congress of IALP; 1995. 46–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kotby MN, Orabi AA. Voice range profile as a quantitative measure of vocal function in some pathological voices. In: Kotby MN. XXIII World Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. 6–10 August 1995. Cairo: Secretariat of the XXIII World Congress of IALP; 1995. 50–3.
   Google Scholar
• Hacki T. Comparative speaking, shouting and singing voice range profile measurement: physiological and pathological aspects. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 1996;21:123–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamarche A, Ternström S, Hertegard S. Not just sound: Supplementing the voice range profile with the singer's own perceptions of vocal challenges. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2009;34:3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamarche A. Putting the singing voice on the map: Towards improving the quantitative evaluation of voice status in professional female singers [doctoral thesis]. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Computer Sciences and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Pabon JPH. Objective acoustic voice-quality parameters in the computer phonetogram. J Voice. 1991;5:203–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabon JPH, Plomb R. Automatic phonetogram recording supplemented with acoustical voice-quality parameters. J Speech Hear Res. 1988;31:710–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sulter AM, Schutte HK, Miller DG. Differences in phonetogram features between male and female subjects with and without vocal training. J Voice. 1995;9:363–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen MF. A longitudinal pilot study on phonetograms/voice profiles in pre pubertal choir boys. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1993;18:488–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen MF. Normal development of voice in children. Advances in evidence-based standards. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dejonckere PH, van Wijck I, Speyer R. Efficacy of voice therapy assessed with the Voice Range Profile (Phonetogram). Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2003;124:285–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeBorgne W, Weinrich BD. Phonetogram changes for trained singers over a nine-month period of vocal training. J Voice. 2002;16:37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speyer R, Wieneke GH, van Wijck-Warnaar I, Dejonckere PH. Effects of voice therapy on the voice range profiles of dysphonic patients. J Voice. 2003;17:544–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren U, Södersten M, Falhammar H, Thorén M, Hagenfeldt K, Nordenskjöld A. Voice characteristics in women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;70:18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Södersten M, Ternström S, Bohman M. Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers. J Voice. 2005;19:29–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronsson C, Bohman M, Ternström S, Södersten M. Loud voice during environmental noise exposure in patients with vocal nodules. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2007;32:60–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg EB, Oates J, Dacakis G, Grant C. Phonetograms, aerodynamic measurements, self-evaluations, and auditory perceptual ratings of male-to-female transsexual voice. J Voice. 2010;24:511–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzing P. Glottografisk frekvensindikering. En undersökningsmetod för mätning av röstläge och röstomfång samt framställning av röstfrekvensdistributionen [doctoral thesis]. Malmö, Sweden: Department of Otolaryngology, Lund University 1979. 1–182 (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Pegoraro Krook MI. Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of normal Swedish subjects obtained by glottal frequency analysis. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1988;40:82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch C, Gould W, Hirano M. Effect of voice therapy on contact granuloma of the vocal fold. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981;90:48–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper M, Nahum AM. Vocal rehabilitation for contact ulcer of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol. 1967;85:41–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peacher G, Hollinger P. Contact ulcer of the larynx: the role of vocal rehabilitation. Arch Otolaryngol. 1947;46:617–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman RE, Holmberg EB, Perkell JS, Walsh M, Vaughan C. Objective assessment of vocal hyperfunction: An experimental framework and initial results. J Speech Hear Res. 1989;32:373–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verdolini K, Hoffman HT, McCoy S. Nonspecific laryngeal granuloma: a case study of a professional singer. J Voice. 1994;8:352–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylitalo R, Hammarberg B. Voice characteristics, effects of voice therapy, and long-term follow-up of contact granuloma patients. J Voice. 2000;14:577–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman RF. Sources of variation in phonetograms. J Voice. 1993;7:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramming P, Sundberg J, Akerlund L. Variability of phonetograms. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1991;43:79–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamarche A, Ternström S, Pabon P. The singer's voice range profile: Female professional opera soloists. J Voice. 2010;24:410–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze IR, Wong D, Milder MA, Hensley SR, Ramig LO. Comparison between clinician-assisted and fully automated procedures for obtaining a voice range profile. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38:526–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedersen MF, Frokjaer-Jensen B, Pabst F, Schutte HK, Hacki T, Hansen HL. Standardizing voice range profile measurements (Phonetography/Stimmfeldmessung). In: Kotby MN. XXIII World Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. 6–10 August 1995. Cairo: Secretariat of the XXIII World Congress of IALP; 1995. 41–5.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte HK, Seidner W. Recommendation by the Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP): standardizing voice area measurement/phonetography. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1983; 35:286–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylen L, Wuyts FL, Mertens F, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning PH. Normative voice range profiles of male and female professional voice users. J Voice. 2002;16:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabon P, Ternström S, Lamarche A. Fourier descriptor analysis and unification of voice range profile contours: method and applications. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54:755–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson B, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit G, Jacobson G, Benninger M, . The voice handicap index (VHI): Development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6:66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Verdonck-de Leeuw I, Kuik D, De Bodt M, Guimaraes I, Holmberg E, Nawka T, . Validation of the voice handicap index by assessing equivalence of European translations. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60:173–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson AC, Dotevall H. Voice handicap index in Swedish. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2009;34:60–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson AC. Voice Handicap Index in Swedish – validation and reliability. Paper presented at the 4th Pan European Voice Conference (PEVOC), Stockholm, Sweden, August 23–26, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Elofsson J, Lind A. [Swe-Vapp, translation and validation of the “Voice Activity and Participation Profile”—a questionnaire for voice use and communication for individuals with voice problems] [master thesis] Stockholm, Sweden: CLINTEC, Division of speech language pathology, Karolinska Institutet; 2005 (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Chen SH. Sex differences in frequency and intensity in reading and voice range profiles for Taiwanese adult speakers. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 2007;59:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton R, Casper J. Understanding voice problems: A physiological perspective for diagnosis and treatment. 2nd Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Walkins; 1996. 1–418.
   Google Scholar
• Sihvo M, Laippala P, Sala E. A study of repeated measures of softest and loudest phonations. J Voice. 2000;14:161–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramming P, Akerlund L. Non-organic dysphonia. II. Phonetograms for normal and pathological voices. Acta Otolaryngol. 1988;106:468–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramming P, Sundberg J, Ternström S, Leanderson R, Perkins WH. Relationship between changes in voice pitch and loudness. J Voice. 1988;2:118–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gramming P, Gauffin J, Sundberg J. An attempt to improve the clinical usefulness of phonetograms. J Phonetics. 1986; 14:421–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson C, Sundberg J, Wilbrand H. X-ray study of articulation and formant frequencies in two female singers. Askenfelt A, Felicetti S, Jansson E, Sundberg J. Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference (SMAC 83). Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Academy of Music; 1983. 203–18.
   Google Scholar
• Airainer R, Klingholz F. Quantitative evaluation of phonetograms in the case of functional dysphonia. J Voice. 1993; 7:136–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siupsinskiene N. Quantitative analysis of professionally trained versus untrained voices. Medicina (Kaunas). 2003; 39:36–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar